Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wirksamkeit ambulanter Rehabilitation von Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen

Efficiency of ambulant cardiological rehabilitation

  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die unveränderte Progression von Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen mit ihren umfangreichen sozialen und ökonomischen Auswirkungen auf unsere Gesellschaft erfordern ein Umdenken. Prävention und Rehabilitation müssen stärker berücksichtigt werden, denn nur so wird man dem komplexen Problem der Behandlung von Risikofaktoren gerecht werden können. Die in Deutschland übliche 3-wöchige stationäre Rehabilitation kann zwar exzellente kurzfristige, aber keine nachhaltige längerfristige Änderung des Risikofaktorenprofiles bewirken. Ambulante Strategien können diesen Nachteil ausgleichen.

Abstract

The unchanged progression of heart disease like CAD with its extensive social and economic effects in our society require rethinking. Prevention and rehabilitation must be considered stronger to make adequate treatment of complex risk factors possible. The usual 3-week stationary rehabilitation in Germany results in excellent shortterm, but no lasting long-term change in the risk factor profile. Ambulatory strategies can balance this disadvantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Belardinelli R, Georgiou D, Cianci G, Purcaro A (1999) Randomized, Controlled Trial of Long-Term Moderate Exercise Training in Chronic Heart Failure: Effects on Functional Capacity, Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome. Circulation 99:1173–1182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gielen S, Brutsaert D, Saner H, Hambrecht R (2006) Cardiac Rehabilitation. In: The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, Blackwell Publishing and Gielen S, Schulter G, Hambrecht R (2001) Benefits of exercise training for patients with chronic heart failure. Clinical Geriatrics 9:32–45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamalainen H, Luurila O, Kallio V, Knuts L, Arstila M, Hakkila J (1989) Long-term reduction in sudden deaths after a multifactorial intervention programme in patients with myocardial infarction: 10-year results of a controlled investigation. European Heart Journal 10:55–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedbäck Bo, Perk J, Hörnblad M, Ohlsson U (2001) Cardiac rehabilitation after coronar artery bypass surgery: 10 years results on . . . J of Cardiov Risk 8:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Held K, Müller-Fahrnow W, Karoff M, Nowossadeck E (1999) CARO – die DGPR-Studie: Ergebnisse der Sekundärprävention. Prävention und Rehabilitation 4:223–226

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hollmann W (2002) Kurze Geschichte der kardiologischen Rehabilitation mittels körperlicher Aktivität. Med Welt 53:419–423

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jolliffe JA, Rees K, Taylor RS, Thompson D, Oldridge N, Ebrahim S (2001) Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease (Cochrane review). In: Cochrane Library, Oxford

  8. O'Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, Goldhaber SZ, Olmstead EM, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hennekens CH (1989) An overview of randomised trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation 80:234–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer NM, Rimm AA (1988) Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: combined experience of randomised clinical trials. JAMA 260:945–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saner H (2002) Ambulante kardiale Rehabilitation in der Schweiz. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin 5:53

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scholte op Reimer WJM, Gitt AK, Boersma E, Simoons ML (Eds) (2006) Cardiovascular Diseases in Europe. Euro Heart Survey, Sophia Antipolis. European Society of Cardiology

  12. Skof E, Span M, Keber I (2001) Secondary prevention in patients several years after myocardial infarction: comparison of an outpatient and an inpatient rehabilitation programm. J of Cardiov Risk 8:119–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe H, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone A, Thompson DR, Oldridge N (2004) Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 116:682–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vanhees I, McGee H, Dugmore L, Schepers D, v Daele P (2002) The Carinex Survey. J Cardiopulmonary Rehab 22:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Völler H, Klein G, Gohlke H, Dovifat C, Binting S, Müller-Nordhorn J, Willich S (2000) Sekundärprävention Koronarkranker nach stationärer Rehabilitation (PIN Studie). Dtsch med Wochenschr 125:1457–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für ambulante Rehabilitation und Prävention, Forststr. 5, 01099, Dresden, Germany

    A. Charrier

Authors
  1. A. Charrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Charrier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charrier, A. Wirksamkeit ambulanter Rehabilitation von Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl 2, IV99–IV102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-007-0018-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-007-0018-4

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Search

Navigation