Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative analysis of impact of green stormwater infrastructures on combined sewer overflow control and urban flooding control

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stimulated by the recent USEPA’s green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) guidance and policies, GSI systems have been widely implemented in the municipal area to control the combined sewer overflows (CSOs), also known as low impact development (LID) approaches. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of GSI systems on CSO and urban flooding control, USEPA-Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) model was adopted in this study to simulate the behaviors of GSI systems in a well-developed urban drainage area, PSW45, under different circumstances. The impact of different percentages of stormwater runoff transported from impervious surfaces to the GSI systems on CSO and urban flooding control has also been investigated. Results show that with current buildup, GSI systems in PSW45 have the best performance for low intensity and short duration events on both volume and peak flow reductions, and have the worst performance for high intensity and long duration events. Since the low intensity and short duration events are dominant from a long-term perspective, utilizing GSI systems is considered as an effective measure of CSO control to meet the long-term control strategy for PSW45 watershed. However, GSI systems are not suitable for the flooding control purpose in PSW45 due to the high occurrence possibility of urban flooding during or after high intensity events where GSI systems have relatively poor performance no matter for a short or long duration event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qin H P, Li Z X, Fu G. The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129: 577–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitt T G, Thomas M, Ettrich N. Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2004, 299(3–4): 300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen B, Liu J, She N, Xu K. Optimization of low impact development facilities in Beijing CITIC complex. In: Proceedings of International Low Impact Development Conference 2015, 2015, 342–351

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Common Wealth of Pennnsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Pennsylvania Code, Title 25 Environmental Protection, Chapter 93 Water Quality Standards Version: (324889) No. 388. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pensylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  6. Philadelphia Water Department. The City of Philadelphia’s Program for Combined Sewer Overflow Control—Long Term Control Plan Update, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kambites C, Owen S. Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK. Planning Practice and Research, 2006, 21(4): 483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marty M, Rusty T. Low Impact Development Manual for Arkansas, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myers R D, Smullen J, Cromwell J, Raucher B, Cammarata M. Balancing green and traditional infrastructure for sustainable urban wet weather management. SIWW Paper, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert N S, Long G, Jaffee J. Assessment of the economic impact of additional combined sewer overflow controls in the massachusetts water resource authority service area. Analysis Group Incorporated, 2004, 13

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Combined sewer overflow (CSO) control policy. Federal Register, 1994, 75(59): 18688–18698

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pieschek R L, Carpenter D D. Modeling green infrastructure in the support of the re-development of Detroit’s neighborhoods. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016, 247–254

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucas W C, Sample D J. Reducing combined sewer overflows by using outlet controls for Green Stormwater Infrastructure: case study in Richmond, Virginia. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2015, 520: 473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu W, Chen W, Peng C. Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: a community scale study. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 291: 6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCutcheon M, Wride D, Reinicke J. An evaluation of modeling green infrastructure using LID controls. Journal of Water Management Modeling, R245–12, 2012, 193–205

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pitt R, Voorhees J, Clark S. Integrating green infrastructure into a combined sewer service area model. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010. Challenges of Change, 2010, 2950–2963

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. York C, Goharian E, Burian S J. Impacts of large-scale stormwater green infrastructure implementation and climate variability on receiving water response in the Salt Lake City area. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 11(4): 278–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jayasooriya V M, Ng A W M. Tools for modeling of stormwater management and economics of green infrastructure practices: a review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2014, 225(8): 2055-2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huber W C, Dickinson R E. Stormwater management model user's manual. Version 4, EPA/600/3–88/001a (NTIS PB88–236641/AS). Athens, GA: Environmental Protection Agency, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. USEPA. Computer tools for sanitary sewer system capacity analysis and planning. EPA/600/R-07/111, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  21. USEPA. Storm water management model reference manual volume I—Hydrology (Revised), EPA/600/R-15/162A, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmer A, Schmidt A, Ostfeld A, Minsker B. Computationally implicit hydraulics for real-time combined sewer overflow modeling and decision support. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012, 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abi Aad M, Suidan M T, Shuster WD. Modeling techniques of best management practices: rain barrels and rain gardens using EPA SWMM-5. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 15(6): 434–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang S, Guo Y. SWMM simulation of the storm water volume control performance of permeable pavement systems. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014, 20(8): 06014010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang G, Hamlett J, Saravanapavan T. Representation of low impact development scenarios in SWMM, Journal of Water Management Modeling, 2010, R236–12, 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ormsbee L. Rainfall Disaggregation Model for Continuous Hydrologic Modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1989, 115(4), 507–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun N, Hall M, Hong B, Zhang L. Impact of SWMM catchment discretization: Case study in Syracuse, New York. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2012, 19(1): 223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards T K, Glysson G D. Field Methods for Measurement of Fluvial Sediment. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1988, 118, 86–531

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rawls W J, Brakensiek D L, Miller N. Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1983, 109(1): 62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Feng Y, Burian S, Pomeroy C. ET influence on urban stormwater runoff estimation. In: ASCE Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2013, 2013, 154–163

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Muleta MK. Uncertainty analysis and calibration of SWMMusing a formal, Bayesian methodology. In: Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012, 2012, 562–568

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Barco J, Wong K M, Stenstrom M K. Automatic calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM Model for a large urban catchment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(4): 466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China

    Jinsong Tao

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Zijian Li

  3. Unified Investigations & Sciences, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33071, USA

    Xinlai Peng

  4. Office of Watersheds, Philadelphia Water, 1101 Market Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA

    Gaoxiang Ying

Authors
  1. Jinsong Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zijian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinlai Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gaoxiang Ying
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaoxiang Ying.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, J., Li, Z., Peng, X. et al. Quantitative analysis of impact of green stormwater infrastructures on combined sewer overflow control and urban flooding control. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 11, 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0952-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0952-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation