Skip to main content
Log in

Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research on wet scrubbers has only studied highly acidic scrubbing solutions because of their high ammonia capture efficiencies; however, the high acidity created practical problems. Lower acidity solutions would reduce corrosion, maintenance, and cost; however, designers may need to use strategies for increasing scrubber effectiveness, such as using lower air velocities. The objective of this study was to determine if a spray scrubber with slightly acidic and higher pH scrubbing solution (pH from 2 to 8) could effectively remove NH3 from NH3 laden air (such as animal building exhaust air), and also collect this valuable resource for later use as a fertilizer. A bench-scale spray wet scrubber treated 20 ppmv NH3/air mixture in a countercurrent contact chamber. First, the solution pH was varied from 2 to 8 while maintaining constant air velocity at 1.3 m•s–1. Next, air velocity was increased (2 and 3 m•s–1) while solution pH remained constant at pH6. At 1.3 m•s–1, NH3 removal efficiencies ranged between 49.0% (pH8) and 84.3% (pH2). This study has shown that slightly acidic scrubbing solutions are a practical means of removing ammonia from air especially if the scrubber is designed to increase collisions between solution droplets and NH3 molecules. The NH3 removed from the air was held in solution as NH4 + and accumulates over time so the solution should be an excellent fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USDA. Poultry-Production and Value 2011 Summary. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gates R S, Casey K D, Wheeler E F, Xin H, Pescatore A J. US broiler housing ammonia emissions inventory. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(14): 3342–3350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wheeler E F, Casey K D, Gates R S, Xin H, Zajaczkowski J L, Topper P A, Liang Y, Pescatore A J. Ammonia emissions from twelve U.S. broiler chicken houses. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(5): 1495–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miles D M, Branton S L, Lott B D. Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poultry Science, 2004, 83(10): 1650–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donham K J, Cumro D, Reynolds S. Synergistic effects of dust and ammonia on the occupational health effects of poultry production workers. Journal of Agromedicine, 2002, 8(2): 57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang Y, Quan X, Chen J, Chung J S, Sung J Y, Chen S, Xue D, Zhao Y. Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 80(1–3): 259–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Melse R W, Ogink N W M. Air scrubbing techniques for ammonia and odor reduction at livestock operations: review of on-farm research in the Netherlands. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(6): 2303–2313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marsh L S, Gay S W, Van Wicklen G L. Performance evaluation of the Sanscent air scrubber for removal of dust, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from the exhaust air of a swine nursery. In: ASAE Paper No. 034052. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Polakow J A, Wang X, Riskowski G L, Sun Y, Ford S E. An aerodynamic deduster to reduce dust and gas emissions from ventilated livestock facilities. In Livestock Environment VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium. Kentucky, USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hadlocon L S, Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y. Optimization of ammonia absorption using acid spray wet scrubbers. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(2): 647–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadlocon L S, Zhao LY, Manuzon R B, Elbatawi I E. An acid spray scrubber for recovery of ammonia emissions from a deep-pit swine facility. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(3): 949–960

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao L Y, Riskowski G L, Stroot P, Robert M, Heber A J. Development of a wet scrubber to reduce dust and gas emissions from swine buildings. In ASAE Paper No. 014075. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aarnink A J A, Landman W J, Melse R W, Huynh T T T. Systems for eliminating pathogen exhaust air of animal houses. In: Livestock Environment VII, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium, Beijing, China, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y, Keener H M, Darr M J. A prototype acid spray scrubber for absorbing ammonia emissions from exhaust fans of animal buildings. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007, 50(4): 1395–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ocfemia K, Zhang Y, Tan Z. Ammonia absorption in a vertical sprayer at low ammonia partial pressures. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(4): 1561–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Samani Majd A M, Kalbasi A, Riskowski G L, Muhhtar S, Zhao L Y, Fang W. Electrolyzed water spray scrubber for removing ammonia from air. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(4): 1069–1078

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hadlocon L J, Manuzon R B, Zhao L. Development and evaluation of a full-scale spray scrubber for ammonia recovery and production of nitrogen fertilizer at poultry facilities. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(1–4): 405–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies T H, Ip S Y. The droplet size and height effects in ammonia removal in a spray tower. Water Research, 1981, 15(5): 525–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ASHRAE. ANSI 41.2. ASHRAE 41.2: Standard Methods for Laboratory Airflow Measurment. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samani Majd A M, Mukhtar S. Ammonia recovery enhancement using a tubular gas-permeable membrane system in laboratory and field-scale studies. Transactions of the ASABE, 2013, 56(5): 1951–1958

    Google Scholar 

  21. APHA. Standard Methodes for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hach. Sension, Ammonia Gas Sensing Combination Electrode. Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hach. Sension, Gel-filled pH Electrode. Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zahn J A, Tung A E, Roberts B A, Hatfield J L. Abatement of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine lagoon using a polymer biocover. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 562–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Emerson K, Russo R C, Lund R E, Thurston R V. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, 32(12): 2379–2383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Environmental Protection Agency of United States. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium-tabulation of percent un-ionized ammonia. EPA-600/3–79–091, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  27. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41(4): 1149–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Samani Majd A M. Application of gas permable membranes for mitigation of ammonia gas from animal manure. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hadlocon L S, Zhao LY. Production of ammonium sulfate fertilizer using acid spray wet scrubbers. Agric. Eng. Int: CIGR Journal, 2015, 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 1. Uptake by aqueous surfaces as a function of pH. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8812–8823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swartz E, Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 2. Uptake by sulfuric acid surfaces. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8824–8833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald L. Riskowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashtari, A.K., Majd, A.M.S., Riskowski, G.L. et al. Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0869-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0869-3

Keywords

Navigation