Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vacuum promotes metabolic shifts and increases biogenic hydrogen production in dark fermentation systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The successful operation of any type of hydrogen-producing bioreactor depends on the performance of the microorganisms present in the system. Both substrate and partial gas pressures are crucial factors affecting dark fermentation metabolic pathways. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of both factors on hydrogen production using anaerobic granular sludge as inoculum and, secondly, to study the metabolic shifts of an anaerobic community subjected to low partial gas pressures. With this goal in mind, seven different wastewater (four synthetic media, two industrial wastewater, and one domestic effluent) and the effect of applying vacuum on the systems were analyzed. The application of vacuum promoted an increase in the diversity of hydrogenproducing bacteria, such as Clostridium, and promoted the dominance of acetoclastic- over hydrogenotrophic methanogens. The application of different media promoted a wide variety of metabolic pathways. Nevertheless, reduction of the hydrogen partial pressure by application of vacuum lead to further oxidation of reaction intermediates irrespective of the medium used, which resulted in higher hydrogen and methane production, and improved the COD removal. Interestingly, vacuum greatly promoted biogenic hydrogen production from a real wastewater, which opens possibilities for future application of dark fermentation systems to enhance biohydrogen yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stronach S M, Rudd T, Lester J N. Anaerobic Digestion Processes in Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Biotechnology Monographs. Berlin: Germany Springer-Verlag, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu B, Chen S. Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(15): 3266–3273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mizuno O, Dinsdale R, Hawkes F R, Hawkes D L, Noile T. Enhancement of hydrogen production by nitrogen gas sparging. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73(1): 59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlsson A, Vallin L, Ejelertsson J. Effects of temperature hydraulic retention time and hydrogen extraction rate on hydrogen production from the fermentation food industry residues and manure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(3): 953–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang T M, Cheng S S, Wu K L. Behavioral study on hydrogen fermentation reactor installed with silicone rubber membrane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(11–12): 1157–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark I C, Zhang R H, Upadhyaya S K. The effect of low pressure and mixing on biological hydrogen production via anaerobic fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37 (15): 11504–11513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee K S, Tseng T S, Liu Y W, Hsiao Y D. Enhancing the performance of dark fermentative hydrogen production using a reduced pressure fermentation strategy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(20): 15556–15562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Show K Y, Lee D J, Chang J S. Bioreactor and process design for biohydrogen production. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(18): 8524–8533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang G L, Huang J, Sun Z J, Tang Q Q, Yan C H, Liu G Q. Biohydrogen production from cattle wastewater by enriched anaerobic mixed consortia: influence of fermentation temperature and pH. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2008, 106(1): 80–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang H H P, Liu H, Zhang T. Characterization of a hydrogenproducing granular sludge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2002, 78(1): 44–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee K S, Wu J F, Lo Y S, Lo Y C, Lin P J, Chang J S. Anaerobic hydrogen production with an efficient carrier-induced granular sludge bed bioreactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2004, 87 (5): 648–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkes F R, Hussy I, Kyazze G, Dinsdale R, Hawkes D L. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: Principles and progress. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 172–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Niu K, Zhang X, Tan W S, Zhu M L. Characterization of fermentative hydrogen production with Klebsiella pneumoniae ECU-15 isolated from anaerobic sewage sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(1): 71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia Mancha N, Puyol D, Monsalvo V M, Rajhi H, Mohedano A F, Rodriguez J J. Anaerobic treatment of wastewater from used industrial oil recovery. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2012, 87(9): 1320–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanz J L, Rodríguez N, Amils R. The action of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion process. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1996, 46(5–6): 587–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, 1998

  17. Fang H H P, Zhang T, Liu H. Microbial diversity of a mesophilic hydrogen-producing sludge. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2002, 58(1): 112–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo Y C, Chen W M, Hung C H, Chen S D, Chang J S. Dark H2 fermentation from sucrose and xylose using H2-producing indigenous bacteria: feasibility and kinetic studies. Water Research, 2008, 42(4–5): 827–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanso S, Dasri K, Tingthong S, Watanapokasin R Y. Diversity of cultivable hydrogen-producing bacteria isolated from agricultural soils, waste water sludge and cow dung. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(14): 8735–8742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Toh H, Sharma V K, Oshima K, Kondo S, Hattori M, Ward F B, Free A, Taylor T D. Complete genome sequences of Arcobacter butzleri ED-1 and Arcobacter sp. strain L, both isolated from a microbial fuel cell. Journal of Bacteriology, 2011, 193(22): 6411–6412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu W T, Chan O C, Fang H H P. Characterization of microbial community in granular sludge treating brewery wastewater. Water Research, 2002, 36(7): 1767–1775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu F, Fang B. Optimization of bio-hydrogen production from biodiesel wastes by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnology Journal, 2007, 2(3): 374–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun W, Sierra-Alvarez R, Milner L, Field J A. Anaerobic oxidation of arsenite linked to chlorate reduction. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(20): 6804–6811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Diaz E E, Stams F, Amils R, Sanz J L. Phenotypic properties and microbial diversity of methanogenic granules from a full-scale UASB reactor treating brewery wastewaters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(7): 4942–4949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jun Y S, Yu S H, Ryu K G, Lee T J. Kinetic study of pH effects on biological hydrogen production by a mixed culture. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 18(6): 1130–1135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicolau J M, Guwy A, Dinsdale R, Premier G, Esteves S. Production of hydrogen from sewage biosolids in a continuously fed bioreactor: Effect of hydraulic retention time and sparging. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(2): 469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mead G C. The amino acid-fermenting clostridia. Journal of General Microbiology, 1971, 67(1): 47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Staples C A, Williams J B, Craig G R, Roberts K M. Fate, effects and potential environmental risks of ethylene glycol: a review. Chemosphere, 2001, 43(3): 377–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Antonopoulou G, Gaval N, Skiadas I V, Lyberatos G. Influence of pH fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(5): 1921–1928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lay J J, Fan K S, Chang J L, Ku C H. Influence of chemical nature of organic wastes on their conversion to hydrogen by heat-shock sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, 28(12): 1361–1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hussy I, Hawkes F R, Dinsdale R, Hawkes D L. Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from a wheat starch co-product by mixed microflora. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2003, 84 (6): 619–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalia V C, Purohit H J. Microbial diversity and genomics in aid of bioenergy. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2008, 35(5): 403–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Speece R E. Anaerobic Biotechnology (for Industrial wastewater). Nashville, Tennessee: Archae Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Biology, University Autonoma of Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain

    Haifa Rajhi & José L. Sanz

  2. Section of Chemical Engineering, University Autonoma of Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain

    Daniel Puyol

  3. MYGEN Laboratory, Cantoblanco, Madrid, 28049, Spain

    Mirna C. Martínez & Emiliano E. Díaz

Authors
  1. Haifa Rajhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Puyol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirna C. Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emiliano E. Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. José L. Sanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José L. Sanz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajhi, H., Puyol, D., Martínez, M.C. et al. Vacuum promotes metabolic shifts and increases biogenic hydrogen production in dark fermentation systems. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 513–521 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0777-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0777-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation