Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the removal of monovalent and divalent cations in the microbial desalination cell

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial desalination cell (MDC) is a promising technology to desalinate water and generate electrical power simultaneously. The objectives of this study were to investigate the desalination performance of monovalent and divalent cations in the MDC, and discuss the effect of ion characteristics, ion concentrations, and electrical characteristics. Mixed salt solutions of NaCl, MgCl2, KCl, and CaCl2 with the same concentration were used in the desalination chamber to study removal of cations. Results showed that in the mixed salt solutions, the electrodialysis desalination rates of cations were: Ca2+ >Mg2+>Na+>K+. Higher ionic charges and smaller hydrated ionic radii resulted in higher desalination rates of the cations, in which the ionic charge was more important than the hydrated ionic radius. Mixed solutions of NaCl and MgCl2 with different concentrations were used in the desalination chamber to study the effect of ion concentrations. Results showed that when ion concentrations of Na+ were one-fifth to five times of Mg2+, ion concentration influenced the dialysis more profoundly than electrodialysis. With the current densities below a certain value, charge transfer efficiencies became very low and the dialysis was the main process responsible for the desalination. And the phosphate transfer from the anode chamber and potassium transfer from the cathode chamber could balance 1%–3% of the charge transfer in the MDC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao X, Huang X, Liang P, Xiao K, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Logan B E. A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(18): 7148–7152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Logan B E, Regan J M. Microbial fuel cells-challenges and applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5172–5180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hou Y, Li K, Luo H, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Chen S. Using crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol polymer membrane as a separator in the microbial fuel cell. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering

  4. Chen X, Xia X, Liang P, Cao X, Sun H, Huang X. Stacked microbial desalination cells to enhance water desalination efficiency. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(6): 2465–2470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson K S, Drew D M, He Z. Efficient salt removal in a continuously operated upflow microbial desalination cell with an air cathode. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(1): 376–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Y, Logan B E. Series assembly of microbial desalination cells containing stacked electrodialysis cells for partial or complete seawater desalination. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(13): 5840–5845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo H, Jenkins P E, Ren Z. Concurrent desalination and hydrogen generation using microbial electrolysis and desalination cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(1): 340–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehanna M, Kiely P D, Call D F, Logan B E. Microbial electrodialysis cell for simultaneous water desalination and hydrogen gas production. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(24): 9578–9583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Luo Y. Development of the microbial electrolysis desalination and chemical-production cell for desalination as well as acid and alkali productions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(4): 2467–2472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen S, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Luo Y, Hou Y. Improved performance of the microbial electrolysis desalination and chemicalproduction cell using the stack structure. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 116: 507–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson K S, Drew D M, He Z. Use of a liter-scale microbial desalination cell as a platform to study bioelectrochemical desalination with salt solution or artificial seawater. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(10): 4652–4657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehanna M, Saito T, Yan J L, Hickner M, Cao X, Huang X, Logan B E. Using microbial desalination cells to reduce water salinity prior to reverse osmosis. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(8): 1114–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng S, Xing D, Call D F, Logan B E. Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(10): 3953–3958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Cheng S, Logan B E. Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(2): 658–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Logan B E, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Firdaous L, Quéméneur F, Schlumpf J P, Malériat J P. Modification of the ionic composition of salt solutions by electrodialysis. Desalination, 2004, 167: 397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Walha K, Amar R B, Firdaous L, Quéméneur F, Jaouen P. Brackish groundwater treatment by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in Tunisia: performance and cost comparison. Desalination, 2007, 207(1–3): 95–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo H, Xu P, Jenkins P E, Ren Z. Ionic composition and transport mechanisms in microbial desalination cells. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 409–410: 16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim J R, Cheng S, Oh S E, Logan B E. Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(3): 1004–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi J H, Lee H J, Moon S H. Effects of electrolytes on the transport phenomena in a cation-exchange membrane. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2001, 238(1): 188–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozendal R A, Sleutels T H J A, Hamelers H V M, Buisman C J N. Effect of the type of ion exchange membrane on performance, ion transport, and pH in biocatalyzed electrolysis of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 2008, 57(11): 1757–1762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elattar A, Elmindaoui A, Pismenskaia N, Gavach C, Pourcelly G. Comparison of transport properties of monovalent anions through anion-exchange membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 143(1–2): 249–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sleutelsa T H J A, Hamelersa H V M, Rozendal R A, Buisman C J N. Ion transport resistance in microbial electrolysis cells with anion and cation exchange membranes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(9): 3612–3620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rozendal R A, Hamelers H V M, Molenkamp R J, Buisman C J N. Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes. Water Research, 2007, 41(9): 1984–1994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan Y, Hu H, Liu H, Sustainable power generation in microbial fuel cells using bicarbonate buffer and proton transfer mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(23): 8154–8158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China

    Shanshan Chen, Haiping Luo, Yanping Hou, Guangli Liu, Renduo Zhang & Bangyu Qin

Authors
  1. Shanshan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haiping Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanping Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guangli Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Renduo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bangyu Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangli Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, S., Luo, H., Hou, Y. et al. Comparison of the removal of monovalent and divalent cations in the microbial desalination cell. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 9, 317–323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0596-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0596-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation