Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of shear force on formation and properties of anoxic granular sludge in SBR

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the effects of shear force on anoxic granular sludge in sequencing batch reactors (SBR). The study was carried out in two SBRs (SBR1 and SBR2) in which sodium acetate (200 mg COD·L−1) was used as the sole substrate and sodium nitrate (40 mgNO3-N·L−1) was employed as the electron acceptor. The preliminary objective of this study was to cultivate anoxic granules in the SBR in order to investigate the effects of shear force on the formation of anoxic granular sludge and to compare the properties of anoxic sludge in the SBR. This study reports new results for the values of average velocity gradient, a measure of the applied shear force, which was varied in the two SBRs (3.79 s−1 and 9.76 s−1 for SBR1 and SBR2 respectively). The important findings of this research highlight the dual effects of shear force on anoxic granules. A low shear force can produce large anoxic granules with high activity and poor settling ability, whereas higher shear forces produce smaller granules with better settling ability and lower activity. The results of this study show that the anoxic granulation is closely related to the strength of the shear force. For high shear force, this research demonstrated that: 1) granules with smaller diameters, high density and good settling ability were formed in the reactor, and 2) granular sludge formed faster than it did in the low shear force reactor (41days versus 76 days). Once a steady-state has been achieved, the nitrate and COD removal rates were found to be 98% and 80%, respectively. For low shear force, such as was applied in SBR1, this research demonstrated that: 1) the activity of anoxic granular sludge in low shear force was higher than that in high shear force, 2) higher amount of soluble microbial products (SMPs) were produced, and 3) large pores were observed inside the larger granules, which are beneficial for nitrogen gas diffusion. Electron microscopic examination of the anoxic granules in both reactors showed that the morphology of the granules was ellipsoidal with a clear outline. Coccus and rod-shaped bacteria were wrapped by filamentous bacteria on the surface of granule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen J, Lun S Y. Study on mechanism of anaerobic sludge granulation in UASB reactors. Water Science & Technology, 1993, 28(7):171–178

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wiegant W M. The ‘spaghetti theory’ on anaerobic sludge formation, or the inevitability of granulation. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder A J B, Grotenhuis J T C, Hulshoff Pol L W, eds. Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and technology. The Netherlands: Pudoc. Wageningen, 1987, 146–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guiot S R, Pauss A, Costerton J W. A structured model of the anaerobic granules consortium.Water science and technology, 1992, 25(7): 1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hulshoff Pol L W, de Castro Lopes S I, Lettinga G, Lens P N L. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1376–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shizas I, Bagley D M. Improving anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance by modifying operational parameters. Water Research, 2002, 36(1): 363–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi K H, Chisti Y, Moo-Young M M. Comparative evaluation of hydrodynamic and gas-liquid mass transfer characteristics in bubble column and airlift slurry reactors. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 1996, 62(3): 223–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sánchez Pérez J A, Rodríguez Porcel E M, Casas López J L, Fernández Sevilla J M, Chisti Y. Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 124(1–3): 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Tay J H. State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnology Advances, 2004, 22(7): 533–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dangcong P, Bernet N, Delgenes J P, Moletta R. Aerobic granular sludge — a case report. Water Research, 1999, 33(3): 890–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. Microscopy observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactor. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 91(1): 168–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Quevedo M, Guynot E, Muxi E. Denitrifying potential of methanogenic sludge. Biotechnology Letters, 1996, 18(12): 1363–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatti Z I, Sumida K, Rouse J D, Furukawa K. Characterization of denitrifying granular sludge treating soft groundwater in an upflow sludge-blanket reactor. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2001, 91(4): 373–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Q, Du G C, Chen J. Aerobic granular sludge cultivated under the selective pressure as a driving force. Process Biochemistry, 2004, 39(5): 557–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 57(1–2): 227–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adav S S, Lee D J, Lai J Y. Effects of aeration intensity on formation of phenol-fed aerobic granules and extracellular polymeric substances. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 77(1): 175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hulshoff Pol L W, de Zeeuw W J, Velzebber C T M, Lettinga G. Granulation in UASB-reactors. Water science and technology, 1983, 8(9): 291–304

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu J, Zhou H M, Li H Z, Zhang P C, Jiang J. Impacts of hydrodynamic shear force on nucleation of flocculent sludge in anaerobic reactor. Water Research, 2009, 43(12): 3029–3036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Iaconi C, Ramadori R, Lopez A, Passino R. Influence of hydrodynamic shear force on properties of granular biomass in a sequencing batch biofiler reactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 30(2): 152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Tay J H. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge.Water Research, 2002, 36(7): 1653–1665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu H Q, Fang H H P, Tay J H. Enhanced sludge granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by aluminum chloride. Chemosphere, 2001, 44(1): 31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Camp T R. Flocculation and flocculation basins. Transactions, American Society of Civil Eingineer, 1955, 120: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rushton J H, Richards P A. Unit Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering. 2nd ed. Boston: PWA, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rushton J H. Mixing of liquids in chemical process. Industrical and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1952, 44(2): 2931–2936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rushton J H, Oldshue J Y. Mixing-present theory and practice. Chemical Engineering Progress 1953, 49(4): 161–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McCabe W L, Smith J C. Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Yang S F, Tay J H. Elemental compositions and characteristics of aerobic granules cultivated at different substrate N/C ratios. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003, 61(5–6): 556–561

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin L, Liu Y, Tay J H. Denitrification on poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate in microbial granular sludge sequencing batch reactor. Water Research, 2005, 39(8): 1503–1510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tay J H, Yan Y G. Influence of substrate concentration on microbial selection and granulation during start-up of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Environment Research, 1996, 68(7): 1140–1150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereboom J H F, Vereijken T L F M. Methanogenic granule development in full scale internal circulation reactors. Water science and technology, 1994, 30(8): 9–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Etterer T, Wilderer P A. Generation and properties of aerobic granular sludge. Water science and technology, 2001, 43(3): 19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beccari M, Passino R, Ramodori R, Tandoi V. Kinetics of dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite reduction in suspended growth culture. Water Pollution Control Federation, 1983, 55(1): 58–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ni B J, Zeng R J, Fang F, Xie W M, Sheng G P, Yu H Q. Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Research, 2010, 44(7): 2292–2302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jarusutthirak C, Amy G. Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Research, 2007, 41(12): 2787–2793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barker D J, Salvi S M L, Langenhoff A A M, Stuckey D C. Soluble microbial products in ABR treating low-strength wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2000, 126(3): 239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu R, Huang X, Fan B, Fijimoto M, Qian Y. Progress of studies on soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control(in Chinese), 2002, 3(1): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kratochvil K, Wase D A J, Forster C F. The formation and characterization of a granular sludge in an anoxic USB reactor. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 1996, 74(5): 94–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hulshoff Pol L W, Heijnekamp K, Lettinga G. The selection pressure as a driving force behind the granulation of anaerobic sludge. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder A J B, Grotenhuis J T C, Hulshoff Pol L W, eds. Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology. The Netherlands: Pudoc.Wageningen, 1987, 153–61

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pereboom J H F. Size distribution model for methanogenic granules from full scale UASB and IC reactors. Water science and technology, 1994, 30(12): 211–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, Tay J H. Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 90(3): 337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang S F, Tay J H, Liu Y. A novel granular sludge sequencing batch reactor for removal of organic and nitrogen from wastewater. Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, 106(1): 77–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernández-Nava Y, Marañón E, Soons J, Castrillón L. Denitrification of high nitrate concentration wastewater using alternative carbon sources. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1–3): 682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. de Bok F A M, Plugge C M, Stams A J M. Interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic propionate degrading consortia. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1368–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chisti Y. Mass transfer. In: Flickinger M C, Drew S W, eds. Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation, vol. 3. New York: Wiley, 1999, 1607–1640

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, 710055, China

    Xinyan Zhang, Binbin Wang & Dangcong Peng

  2. Sinosteel Wuhan Safety & Environmental Protection Research Institute, Wuhan, 430081, China

    Qingqing Han

  3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710056, China

    Hongmei Zhao

Authors
  1. Xinyan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Binbin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qingqing Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongmei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dangcong Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinyan Zhang or Dangcong Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Wang, B., Han, Q. et al. Effects of shear force on formation and properties of anoxic granular sludge in SBR. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 7, 896–905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0539-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0539-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation