Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the impact of uncertainty in emissions trading markets with bankable permits

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The various forms of uncertainty that firms may face in bankable emission permit trading markets will affect firms’ decision making as well as their market performance. This research explores the effect of increased uncertainty over future input costs and output prices on the temporal distribution of emission. In a dynamic programming setting, the permit price is a convex function of stochastic prices of coal and electricity. Increased uncertainty about future market conditions increases the expected permit price and causes a risk neutral firm to reduce ex ante emissions in order to smooth out marginal abatement costs over time. Finally, safety valves, both low-side and high-side, are suggested to reduce the impact of uncertainty in bankable emission trading markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellerman D. Designing a tradable permit system to control SO2 emissions in China: principles and practice. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2002, 23(2): 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bing Z, Yu Q Q, Jun B. Policy design and performance of emissions trading markets: an adaptive agent-based analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(15): 5693–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson D A, Sholtz A M. Designing pollution market instruments: cases of uncertainty. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1994, 12(4): 114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Godby R W, Mestelman S, Muller R A, Welland J D. Emissions trading with shares and coupons when control over discharges is uncertain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997, 32(3): 359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang F. Does Uncertainty Matter? A Stochastic Dynamic Analysis of Bankable Emission Permit Trading for Global Climate Change Policy. Policy Research Working Paper Series No 4215. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-David S, Brookshire D, Burness S, McKee M, Schmidt C. Attitudes toward risk and compliance in emission permit markets. Land Economics, 2000, 76(4): 590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stavins R N. Transaction cost and tradable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995, 29(2): 133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montero J P. Marketable pollution permits with uncertainty and transaction costs. Resource and Energy Economics, 1998, 20(1): 27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlén B. Market power in international carbon emissions trading: a laboratory test. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2003, 24(3): 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cason T N, Gangadharan L, Duke C. Market power in tradable emission markets: a laboratory testbed for emission trading in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3): 469–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malik A S. Markets for pollution control when firms are noncompliant. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1990, 18(2): 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao J L, Ge H Z, Wei Y M. Impact analysis of China’s coalelectricity price linkage mechanism: results from a game model. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2010, 32(4): 574–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burtraw D, Szambelan S J. U.S. Emissions Trading Markets for SO2 and NOx. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 09-40. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holtsmark B, Mæstad O. Emission trading under the Kyoto Protocol-effects on fossil fuel markets under alternative regimes. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(3): 207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonacina M, Gullì F. Electricity pricing under “carbon emissions trading”: a dominant firm with competitive fringe model. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8): 4200–4220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kara M, Syri S, Lehtilä, A, Helynen S, Kekkonen V, Ruska M, Forsström J. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2): 193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Linares P, JavierSantos F, Ventosa M, Lapiedra L. Impacts of the European emission trading directive and permit assignment methods on the Spanish electricity sector. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2006, 27(1): 79–98

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smale R, Hartley M, Hepburn C, Ward J, Grubb M. The impacts of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 2006, 6(1): 31–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim W, Chattopadhyay D, Park J. Impact of carbon cost on wholesale electricity price: a note on price pass-through issues. Energy, 2010, 35(8): 3441–3448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bunn D, Fezzi C. Interaction of European Carbon Trading and Energy Prices. FEEM Working Paper No. 63.2007. London: London Business School, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daskalakis G, Markellos R N. Are electricity risk premia affected by emission allowance prices? Evidence from the EEX, nord pool and powernext. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(7): 2594–2604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chevallier J. The impact of Australian ETS news on wholesale spot electricity prices: an exploratory analysis. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8): 3910–3921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schennach S M. The economics of pollution permit banking in the context of Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000, 40(3): 189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boutaba M A, Beaumais O, Lardic S. Permit Price Dynamics in the U.S. SO2 Trading Scheme: A Cointegration Approach. Rouen Cedex: University of Rouen, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  25. Refsgaard J C, van der Sluijs J P, Højberg A L, Vanrolleghem P A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-a framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(11): 1543–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Sluijs J P. Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: insights from the UPEM conference. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(5): 590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jolma A, Norton J. Methods of uncertainty treatment in environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(8): 979–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hennessy D A, Roosen J. Stochastic pollution, permits and merger incentives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1999, 37(3): 211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baldursson F M, von der Fehr N H M. Price volatility and risk exposure: on market-based environmental policy instruments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 48(1): 682–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Feng H L, Zhao J H. Alternative intertemporal permit trading regimes with stochastic abatement costs. Resource and Energy Economics, 2006, 28(1): 24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rousse O, Sevi B. Behavioral heterogeneity in the U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions allowance trading program. In: Proceedings of the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Amsterda. Amsterdam: Vrije University, 2005, 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  32. Montgomery W D. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 1972, 5(3): 395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Falk I, Mendelsohn R. The economics of controlling stock pollutants: an efficient strategy for greenhouse gases. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993, 25(1): 76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin J D. A model of intertemporal emission trading, banking, and borrowing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 31(3): 269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kling C, Rubin J. Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. Journal of Public Economics, 1997, 64(1): 101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stranlund J K. A Safety Valve for Emissions Trading. University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Resource Economics Working Paper 2009-4. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jacoby H D, Ellerman A D. The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(4): 481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fell H, Burtraw D, Morgenstern R, Palmer K, Preonas L. Soft and Hard Price Collars in a Cap-and-Trade System: A Comparative Analysis. Washington DC: Resource for Future, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stirling A. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In: Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I, eds. Negotiating Environmental Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, 33–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China

    Yongliang Zhang, Bing Zhang, Jun Bi & Pan He

Authors
  1. Yongliang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bing Zhang or Jun Bi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, B., Bi, J. et al. Modeling the impact of uncertainty in emissions trading markets with bankable permits. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 7, 231–241 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0431-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0431-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation