Abstract
Thermochemical biomass gasification, followed by conversion of the produced syngas to fuels and electrical power, is a promising energy alternative. Real-world characterization of particulate matter (PM) and other contaminants in the syngas is important to minimize damage and ensure efficient operation of the engines it powers and the fuels created from it. A dilution sampling system is demonstrated to quantify PM in syngas generated from two gasification plants utilizing different biomass feedstocks: a BioMax®15 Biopower System that uses raw and torrefied woodchips as feedstocks, and an integrated biorefinery (IBR) that uses rice hulls and woodchips as feedstocks. PM2.5 mass concentrations in syngas from the IBR downstream of the purification system were 12.8–13.7 μg·m−3, which were significantly lower than the maximum level for catalyst protection (500 μg·m−3) and were 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than those in BioMax®15 syngas (2247–4835 μg·m−3). Ultrafine particle number concentration and PM2.5 chemical constituents were also much lower in the IBR syngas than in the BioMax®15. The dilution sampling system enabled reliable measurements over a wide range of concentrations: the use of high sensitivity instruments allowed measurement at very low concentrations (∼1 μg·m−3), while the flexibility of dilution minimized sampling problems that are commonly encountered due to high levels of tars in raw syngas (∼1 g·m−3).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2007, 33(1): 1–18
US DOE. Roadmap for Agriculture Biomass Feedstock Supply in the United States. DOE/NE-ID-11129. Washington DC: US Department of Energy, 2003
Shen L, Liu L T, Yao Z J, Liu G, Lucas M. Development potentials and policy options of biomass in China. Environmental Management, 2010, 46(4): 539–554
Liu H, Jiang G M, Zhuang H Y, Wang K J. Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: With special references of crop residues. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(5): 1402–1418
Sang T, Zhu W X. China’s bioenergy potential. GCB Bioenergy, 2011, 3(2): 79–90
Edwards R D, Smith K R, Zhang J, Ma Y. Models to predict emissions of health-damaging pollutants and global warming contributions of residential fuel/stove combinations in China. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(2): 201–215
Wang X H, Feng ZM. Biofuel use and its emission of noxious gases in rural China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2004, 8(2): 183–192
Shi Y C, Li S H, Liu X J. China’s bioenergy industry development roadmap. Engineering Sciences ( Journal of the Chinese Academy of Engineering), 2009, 7(2): 57–63
US DOE. Roadmap for Bioenergy and Biobased Products in the United States. Biomass Research and Development Initiative, US Department of Energy and US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 2007
Tijmensen M J A, Faaij A P C, Hamelinck C N, van Hardeveld M R M. Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2002, 23(2): 129–152
CEN. Biomass Gasification. Tar and Particles in Product Gases — Sampling and Analysis. CEN/TS 15439:2006: E. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2006
Li C S, Suzuki K. Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification-An overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(3): 594–604
Boerrigter H, den Uil H, Calis H P. Green diesel from biomass via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: new insights in gas cleaning and process design. In: Bridgwater A V, ed. Pyrolysis and Gasification of Biomass and Waste. Newbury (UK): CPL Press, 2003, 385–394
Milne T A, Abatzoglou N, Evans R J. Biomass Gasifier “Tars”: Their Nature, Formation, and Conversion.NREL/TP-570-25357. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 1998
Dry M E. The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catalysis Today, 2002, 71(3–4): 227–241
Yung M M, Jablonski W S, Magrini-Bair K A. Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(4): 1874–1887
US EPA. Method 5-Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources (40 CFR 60. Appendix A to Part 60). Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991
Corio L A, Sherwell J. In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(2): 207–218
ASTM. WK752 Test Method for Determination of PM2.5 Mass and Species Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources by Dilution Sampling. Conshohocken PA: American Society for Testing Materials International, 2008
England G C, Watson J G, Chow J C, Zielinska B, Chang M C O, Loos K R, Hidy G M. Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: Part 1—Compact sampler methodology and performance. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(1): 65–78
England G C, Watson J G, Chow J C, Zielinska B, Chang M C O, Loos K R, Hidy G M. Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: Part 2—Gas-fired combustors compared with other fuel-fired systems. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(1): 79–93
Wall SM. Comparison of a new automated dilution sampler with the conventional EPA source test method for measuring PAH in diesel combustion aerosol. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1998, 29(1): S957–S958
Wong C P, Chan T L, Leung CW. Characterisation of diesel exhaust particle number and size distributions using mini-dilution tunnel and ejector-diluter measurement techniques. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(31): 4435–4446
Yi H H, Hao J M, Duan L, Li X H, Guo X M. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(9): 1243–1251
Zielinska B, Sagebiel J C, McDonald J D, Whitney K, Lawson D R. Emission rates and comparative chemical composition from selected in-use diesel and gasoline-fueled vehicles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(9): 1138–1150
Zielinska B, Sagebiel J C, Arnott W P, Rogers C F, Kelly K E, Wagner D A, Lighty J S, Sarofim A F, Palmer G. Phase and size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in diesel and gasoline vehicle emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(9): 2557–2567
Diebold J P, Browne K, Duncan D, Fields M, Smith T, Walker M, Walt R. The BioMax 15: the automation, integration and precommercial testing of an advanced down-draft gasifier and engine/gen set. In: Bridgwater AV, Boocock DGB, eds. Thermal and Chemical Conversion of Biomass. Newbury (UK): CPL Press, 2004, 894–907
Chow J C, Wang X L, Kohl S D, Gronstal S, Watson J G. Heavy-duty diesel emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region. In: Tropp RJ, Legge AH, eds. In: Proceedings 103rd Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association. Pittsburgh, PA: Air & Waste Management Association, 2010, 1–5
Chow J C, Watson J G. Aerosol chemical analysis on filters. In: Ruzer L, Harley NH, eds. Aerosols Handbook: Measurement, Dosimetry, and Health Effects. New York: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2011
Watson J G, Chow J C, Frazier C A. X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air samples. In: Landsberger S, Creatchman M, eds. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science, 1999, 67–96
Chow J C, Watson J G. Ion chromatography in elemental analysis of airborne particles. In: Landsberger S, Creatchman M, eds. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science, 1999, 97–137
Chow J C, Watson J G, Pritchett L C, Pierson W R, Frazier C A, Purcell R G. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation and applications in US air quality studies. Atmospheric Environment, 1993, 27A(8): 1185–1201
Chow J C, Watson J G, Chen L W A, Chang M C O, Robinson N F, Trimble D, Kohl S D.. The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(9): 1014–1023
Wang X L, Chancellor G, Evenstad J, Farnsworth J E, Hase A, Olson GM, Sreenath A, Agarwal J K. A novel optical instrument for estimating size segregated aerosol mass concentration in real time. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2009, 43(9): 939–950
Dry M E. Fischer-Tropsch Technology. In: Steynberg A P, Dry ME, eds. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Amsterdam (the Netherlands): Elsevier B V, 2004, 1–700
Chow J C, Watson J G, Chen L W A, Rice J, Frank N H. Quantification of PM2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10(12): 5223–5239
Watson J G, Chow J C, Chen L W A, Frank N H. Methods to assess carbonaceous aerosol sampling artifacts for IMPROVE and other long-term networks. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2009, 59(8): 898–911
Watson J G. Visibility: science and regulation. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2002, 52(6): 628–713
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Robbins, C., Hoekman, S.K. et al. Dilution sampling and analysis of particulate matter in biomass-derived syngas. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 5, 320–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0347-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0347-x