Skip to main content
Log in

Dilution sampling and analysis of particulate matter in biomass-derived syngas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermochemical biomass gasification, followed by conversion of the produced syngas to fuels and electrical power, is a promising energy alternative. Real-world characterization of particulate matter (PM) and other contaminants in the syngas is important to minimize damage and ensure efficient operation of the engines it powers and the fuels created from it. A dilution sampling system is demonstrated to quantify PM in syngas generated from two gasification plants utilizing different biomass feedstocks: a BioMax®15 Biopower System that uses raw and torrefied woodchips as feedstocks, and an integrated biorefinery (IBR) that uses rice hulls and woodchips as feedstocks. PM2.5 mass concentrations in syngas from the IBR downstream of the purification system were 12.8–13.7 μg·m−3, which were significantly lower than the maximum level for catalyst protection (500 μg·m−3) and were 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than those in BioMax®15 syngas (2247–4835 μg·m−3). Ultrafine particle number concentration and PM2.5 chemical constituents were also much lower in the IBR syngas than in the BioMax®15. The dilution sampling system enabled reliable measurements over a wide range of concentrations: the use of high sensitivity instruments allowed measurement at very low concentrations (∼1 μg·m−3), while the flexibility of dilution minimized sampling problems that are commonly encountered due to high levels of tars in raw syngas (∼1 g·m−3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2007, 33(1): 1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. US DOE. Roadmap for Agriculture Biomass Feedstock Supply in the United States. DOE/NE-ID-11129. Washington DC: US Department of Energy, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shen L, Liu L T, Yao Z J, Liu G, Lucas M. Development potentials and policy options of biomass in China. Environmental Management, 2010, 46(4): 539–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Jiang G M, Zhuang H Y, Wang K J. Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: With special references of crop residues. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(5): 1402–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sang T, Zhu W X. China’s bioenergy potential. GCB Bioenergy, 2011, 3(2): 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards R D, Smith K R, Zhang J, Ma Y. Models to predict emissions of health-damaging pollutants and global warming contributions of residential fuel/stove combinations in China. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(2): 201–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang X H, Feng ZM. Biofuel use and its emission of noxious gases in rural China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2004, 8(2): 183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Y C, Li S H, Liu X J. China’s bioenergy industry development roadmap. Engineering Sciences ( Journal of the Chinese Academy of Engineering), 2009, 7(2): 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. US DOE. Roadmap for Bioenergy and Biobased Products in the United States. Biomass Research and Development Initiative, US Department of Energy and US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tijmensen M J A, Faaij A P C, Hamelinck C N, van Hardeveld M R M. Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2002, 23(2): 129–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CEN. Biomass Gasification. Tar and Particles in Product Gases — Sampling and Analysis. CEN/TS 15439:2006: E. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li C S, Suzuki K. Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification-An overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(3): 594–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boerrigter H, den Uil H, Calis H P. Green diesel from biomass via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: new insights in gas cleaning and process design. In: Bridgwater A V, ed. Pyrolysis and Gasification of Biomass and Waste. Newbury (UK): CPL Press, 2003, 385–394

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milne T A, Abatzoglou N, Evans R J. Biomass Gasifier “Tars”: Their Nature, Formation, and Conversion.NREL/TP-570-25357. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 1998

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Dry M E. The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catalysis Today, 2002, 71(3–4): 227–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yung M M, Jablonski W S, Magrini-Bair K A. Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(4): 1874–1887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. US EPA. Method 5-Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources (40 CFR 60. Appendix A to Part 60). Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Corio L A, Sherwell J. In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(2): 207–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM. WK752 Test Method for Determination of PM2.5 Mass and Species Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources by Dilution Sampling. Conshohocken PA: American Society for Testing Materials International, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. England G C, Watson J G, Chow J C, Zielinska B, Chang M C O, Loos K R, Hidy G M. Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: Part 1—Compact sampler methodology and performance. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(1): 65–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. England G C, Watson J G, Chow J C, Zielinska B, Chang M C O, Loos K R, Hidy G M. Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: Part 2—Gas-fired combustors compared with other fuel-fired systems. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(1): 79–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wall SM. Comparison of a new automated dilution sampler with the conventional EPA source test method for measuring PAH in diesel combustion aerosol. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1998, 29(1): S957–S958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong C P, Chan T L, Leung CW. Characterisation of diesel exhaust particle number and size distributions using mini-dilution tunnel and ejector-diluter measurement techniques. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(31): 4435–4446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yi H H, Hao J M, Duan L, Li X H, Guo X M. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(9): 1243–1251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zielinska B, Sagebiel J C, McDonald J D, Whitney K, Lawson D R. Emission rates and comparative chemical composition from selected in-use diesel and gasoline-fueled vehicles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(9): 1138–1150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zielinska B, Sagebiel J C, Arnott W P, Rogers C F, Kelly K E, Wagner D A, Lighty J S, Sarofim A F, Palmer G. Phase and size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in diesel and gasoline vehicle emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(9): 2557–2567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Diebold J P, Browne K, Duncan D, Fields M, Smith T, Walker M, Walt R. The BioMax 15: the automation, integration and precommercial testing of an advanced down-draft gasifier and engine/gen set. In: Bridgwater AV, Boocock DGB, eds. Thermal and Chemical Conversion of Biomass. Newbury (UK): CPL Press, 2004, 894–907

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chow J C, Wang X L, Kohl S D, Gronstal S, Watson J G. Heavy-duty diesel emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region. In: Tropp RJ, Legge AH, eds. In: Proceedings 103rd Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association. Pittsburgh, PA: Air & Waste Management Association, 2010, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chow J C, Watson J G. Aerosol chemical analysis on filters. In: Ruzer L, Harley NH, eds. Aerosols Handbook: Measurement, Dosimetry, and Health Effects. New York: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watson J G, Chow J C, Frazier C A. X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air samples. In: Landsberger S, Creatchman M, eds. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science, 1999, 67–96

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chow J C, Watson J G. Ion chromatography in elemental analysis of airborne particles. In: Landsberger S, Creatchman M, eds. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science, 1999, 97–137

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chow J C, Watson J G, Pritchett L C, Pierson W R, Frazier C A, Purcell R G. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation and applications in US air quality studies. Atmospheric Environment, 1993, 27A(8): 1185–1201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chow J C, Watson J G, Chen L W A, Chang M C O, Robinson N F, Trimble D, Kohl S D.. The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(9): 1014–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X L, Chancellor G, Evenstad J, Farnsworth J E, Hase A, Olson GM, Sreenath A, Agarwal J K. A novel optical instrument for estimating size segregated aerosol mass concentration in real time. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2009, 43(9): 939–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dry M E. Fischer-Tropsch Technology. In: Steynberg A P, Dry ME, eds. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Amsterdam (the Netherlands): Elsevier B V, 2004, 1–700

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chow J C, Watson J G, Chen L W A, Rice J, Frank N H. Quantification of PM2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10(12): 5223–5239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watson J G, Chow J C, Chen L W A, Frank N H. Methods to assess carbonaceous aerosol sampling artifacts for IMPROVE and other long-term networks. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2009, 59(8): 898–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Watson J G. Visibility: science and regulation. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2002, 52(6): 628–713

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoliang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Robbins, C., Hoekman, S.K. et al. Dilution sampling and analysis of particulate matter in biomass-derived syngas. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 5, 320–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0347-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0347-x

Keywords

Navigation