Abstract
In recent years, the hierarchical nature of organizations is severely criticized. Will hierarchy be gradually replaced by networks? Or else, will it be revitalized through certain variations while remaining its distinct characteristics in the vertical relationship between upper and lower levels of an organization? Drawing upon research on “administrative organization” by Simon (1962), this research is based upon an in-depth case study on Baosteel, one of the “Fortune Global 500” Chinese iron & steel conglomerate. We find that heterarchy is a variation of hierarchy and applicable in both systems of operations management and strategic management. Moreover, the seemingly paradoxical decentralization of authority and concentration of business activities are discovered as the key driving forces in the formation of hierarchical structure. The existence of heterarchy adds variety to organizational world.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blau P M, Meyer M W (1987). Bureaucracy in Modern Society (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Birkinshaw J M, Morrison A J (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729–753
Chandler A D, Daems H (1980). Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Coase R H (1952). The nature of the firm. In: Stigler G J, Boulding K E (ed.), Readings in Price Theory. Home-wood, IL: Irwin
Cohen M D (2007). Administrative behavior: Laying the foundations for Cyert and March. Organization Science, 18(3): 503–506
Drucker P F (1973). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Practice. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc.
Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32
Ghoshal S, Gratton L (2002). Integrating the enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1): 31–38
Hedlund G (1986). The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy. Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9–26
Heckscher C C (2007). The Collaborative Enterprise-Managing Speed and Complexity in Knowledge-Based Businesses. New Haven: Yale University Press
Jacobides M G (2007). The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18(3): 455–477
Jaques E (1990). In praise of hierarchy. Harvard Business Review, 68: 127–133
Kast F E, Rosenzweig J E (1979). Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill
Larsson R (1993). The handshake between invisible and visible hands. International Studies of Management and Organization, 23(1): 87–107
Laurent A (1978). Managerial subordinacy: A neglected aspect of organizational hierarchies. Academy of management review, 3(2): 220–230
Leavitt H J (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3): 96–102
McCulloch W S (1965). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. In: McCulloch W S (ed.), the Embodiment to Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Milgram S (1974). Obedience to Authority. London: Tavi-stock Publications
Powell W W (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In: Staw B M, Cummings L L (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 295–336
Radner R (1992). Hierarchy: The economics of managing. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3): 1382–1415
Simon H A (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6): 467–482
Simon H A (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press
Weber M (1978). Economy and Society. Berkley: University of California Press
Williamson O E (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269–296
Williamson O E (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Yin R T (2004). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
国务院发展研究中心, 中国企业联合会, 清华大学 (Development Research Center of the State Council, China Enterprise Confederation, Tsinghua University) (2007). 中国式企业管理成功之道研究—宝钢集团有限公司 (Ways to Success with Chinese Style of Management). 北京, 内部交流资料, 213
郭 建光, 郭 亚军, 易 平涛, 黄 立毅 (Guo Jianguang, Guo Yajun, Yi Pingtao, Huang Liyi) (2006). 解析宝钢的体制变革 (An Explanation on Baosteel’s Reforms of Managerial Systems). 企业管理, (4): 62–66
宝钢集团有限公司 (Baosteel Group Corporation) (2007). 以不断的管理创新赢得持续竞争优势 (Gaining long-lasting competitive advantages through continuous managerial innovation). 冶金管理, (6): 13–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
__________
Translated from Guanli Shijie 管理世界 (Management World), 2009, (2): 101–122
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, F. The evolution of hierarchy toward heterarchy: A case study on Baosteel’s managerial systems. Front. Bus. Res. China 4, 515–540 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0109-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0109-9