Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing ability of a wet swale to manage road runoff: A case study in Hefei, China

  • Materials, Metallurgy, Chemical and Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of a wet swale, constructed in an area of poor soil permeability, to manage runoff from a roadway was monitored through 27 storm events over a period of 8 months. During the monitoring period, the wet swale reduced the total runoff volume by 50.4% through exfiltration and evapotranspiration. The wet swale significantly decreased the influent pollutant concentrations, and the effluent mean concentrations of total suspended solids, total phosphorus, chemical oxygen demand, ammonium, oxidized nitrogen, and total nitrogen in the effluent were 31 mg/L, 0.10 mg/L, 29 mg/L, 0.52 mg/L, 0.35 mg/L and 1.28 mg/L, respectively. Pollutant loads were also substantially reduced from 70% to 85%. Plant uptake played an important role in nutrient removal in the wet swale. Approximately half of the nitrogen (53.8%) and phosphorus (51.5%) that entered the wet swale was incorporated in above-ground plants. It is shown that wet swales are useful for managing runoff from roads in areas of poor soil permeability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. YU S L, KUO J T, FASSMAN E A, PAN H. Field test of grassedswale performance in removing runoff pollution [J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2001, 127(3): 168–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BÄCKSTRÖM M. Grassed swales for stormwater pollution control during rain and snowmelt [J]. Water Science & Technology, 2003, 48(9): 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BÄCKSTRÖM M. Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events [J]. Water Science & Technology, 2002, 45(7): 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BARRETT M E. Performance comparison of structural stormwater best management practices [J]. Water Environment Research, 2005, 77(1): 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DELETIC A, FLETCHER T D. Performance of grassed filters used for stormwater treatment–A field and modelling study [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 317(3/4): 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. STAGGE J H, DAVIS, A P, JAMIL E, KIM H. Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff [J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(20): 6731–6742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DAVIS A P, STAGGE J H, JAMIL E, KIM H. Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff [J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(20): 6775–6786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. HARPER H. Effects of stormwater management systems on groundwater quality [R]. Florida: Environmental Research and Design Incorporation, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. KOON J. Evaluation of water quality ponds and swales in the Issaquah/East Lake Sammamish Basins [R]. Washington D C: King County Surface Water Management and Washington Department of Ecology, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. WINSTON R J, HUNT W F, KENNEDY S G, WRIGHT J D, LAUFFER M S. Field evaluation of storm-water control measures for highway runoff treatment [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 138(1): 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LENHART H A. A north carolina field study to evaluate the effect of a coastal stormwater wetland on water quality and quantity and nitrogen accumulation in five wetland plants in two constructed stormwater wetlands [D]. Raleign, USA: The North Carolina State University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CARTER M R, GREGORICH E G. Soil sampling and methods of analysis [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. APHA AWWA, WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [S]. Washington D C: American Public Health Association, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DAVIS A P. Field performance of bioretention: Water quality [J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2007, 24(8): 1048–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. GB 3838—2002. Environment quality standards for surface waters [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002. (in Chinese)

  16. WU J S, ALLAN C J, SAUNDERS W L, EVETT J B. Characterization and pollutant loading estimation for highway runoff [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998, 124(7): 584–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. VAZE J, CHIEW H S. Nutrient loads associated with different sediment sizes in urban stormwater and surface pollutants [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004, 130(4): 391–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. HSIEH C H, DAVIS A P. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban stormwater runoff [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1521–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CHO K W, SONG K G, CHO J W, KIM T G, AHN K H. Removal of nitrogen by a layered soil infiltration system during intermittent storm events [J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 76(5): 690–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NIELSEN L P, CHRISTENSEN P B, REVSBECH N P, SFENSEN J. Denitrification and oxygen respiration in biofilms studied with a microsensor for nitrous oxide and oxygen [J]. Microbial Ecology, 1990, 19(1): 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. BASTVIKEN S K, ERIKSSON P G, PREMROV A, TONDERSKI K S. Potential denitrification in wetland sediments with different plant species detritus [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 25(2): 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. KADLEC R L, WALLACE S D. Treatment wetlands [M]. Florid: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2009: 289–352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Li  (李田).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2011ZX07303-002) supported by National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Projects, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, Ny., Li, T. & Ge, J. Assessing ability of a wet swale to manage road runoff: A case study in Hefei, China. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 1353–1362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3187-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3187-9

Keywords

Navigation