Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distributed collaborative extremum response surface method for mechanical dynamic assembly reliability analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To make the dynamic assembly reliability analysis more effective for complex machinery of multi-object multi-discipline (MOMD), distributed collaborative extremum response surface method (DCERSM) was proposed based on extremum response surface method (ERSM). Firstly, the basic theories of the ERSM and DCERSM were investigated, and the strengths of DCERSM were proved theoretically. Secondly, the mathematical model of the DCERSM was established based upon extremum response surface function (ERSF). Finally, this model was applied to the reliability analysis of blade-tip radial running clearance (BTRRC) of an aeroengine high pressure turbine (HPT) to verify its advantages. The results show that the DCERSM can not only reshape the possibility of the reliability analysis for the complex turbo machinery, but also greatly improve the computational speed, save the computational time and improve the computational efficiency while keeping the accuracy. Thus, the DCERSM is verified to be feasible and effective in the dynamic assembly reliability (DAR) analysis of complex machinery. Moreover, this method offers an useful insight for designing and optimizing the dynamic reliability of complex machinery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

treferences

  1. REED D A. Reliability of multi-component assemblages [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990, 27(2): 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SUZUKIA T, OHASHIA T, ASANO M. Assembly reliability evaluation method (AREM) [J]. Manufacturing Technology, 2003, 52(1): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. JIA Bing-hui, ZHANG Xiao-dong. Study on effect of rotor vibration on tip clearance variation and fast active control of tip clearance [J]. Advanced Material Research, 2010, 139/140/141(1): 2469–2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GOLE N, KUMAR A, NARASIMHAN V. Health risk assessment and prognosis of gas turbine blades by simulation and statistical methods [C]// Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Niagara Falls, Canada, 2008: 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SEKHAN L, CHUNSIK Y. Statistical tolerance and clearance analysis assembly [C]// IEEE Intelligent Robots and Systems Conference. Osaka, Japan: IEEE, 1996: 688–695.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LATTIME S B, STEINETZ B M. Turbine engine clearance control systems: Current practices and future directions [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(2): 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LATTIME S B, STEINETZ B M, ROBBIE M G. Test rig for evaluating active turbine blade tip clearance control concepts [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(3): 552–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ANNETTE E N, CHRISTOPH W M, STEHAN S. Modeling and validation of the thermal effects on gas turbine transients [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127(3): 564–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NSSA Glenn Research Center. HTP clearance control [R]. NASA, CR-2005-213970. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KYPUROS J A, MELCHER K J. A reduced model for prediction of thermal and rotational effects on turbine tip clearance [R]. NASA/TM-2003-212226, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FORSSELL L S. Flight clearance analysis using global nonlinear optimisation-based search algorithms [C]// AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Austin, Texas: AIAA, 2003: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. HUANG Zhang-jun, WANG Chen-gen, CHEN Jian, et al. Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on Kriging surrogate models [J]. Computers and Structures, 2011, 89(1/2): 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. REN Yuan, BAI Guang-chen. New neural network response surface methods for reliability analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2011, 24(1): 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TAN Xiao-hui, BI Wei-hua, HOU Xiao-liang. Reliability analysis using radial basis function networks and support vector machines [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(2): 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CAPOTORTI A, BARBANERA E. Credit scoring analysis using a fuzzy probabilistic rough set model [J]. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2012, 56(4): 981–994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. MA Zhen-yu, LIN Ming-dong, HU Fan. Nonlinear dynamic response analysis of supercavitating vehicles [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(9): 2502–2513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ANI O A, XU He, LIU Shao-gang. Analytical modeling and multi-objective optimization (MOO) of slippage for wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in rough terrain [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(9): 2458–2467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ZHANG Chun-yi, BAI Guang-chen. Extremum response surface method of reliability analysis on two-link flexible robot manipulator [J]. Journal of Center South University, 2012, 19(1): 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LI Chang, HAN Xing. Analysis of reliability sensitivity for gear engagement based on response surface method [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(3): 711–715. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. ERSOY H, MUGAN A. Design sensitivity analysis of structures based upon the singular value decomposition [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 191(32): 3459–3476.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. OWEN J, ROGERS R. Flow and heat transfer in rotating disk system (Volume 1): Rotor-stator system [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. LEE J H, CHOI Y K. A numerical study on flow and heat transfer characteristics of film cooling with a compound angle hole [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 1998, 12(5): 963–971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. FEI Cheng-wei, BAI Guang-chen. Study on extremum selection method of random variable for nonlinear dynamic reliability analysis [J]. Propulsion and Power Research, 2012, 1(1): 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Jet Propulsion, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Cheng-wei Fei  (费成巍) & Guang-chen Bai  (白广忱)

Authors
  1. Cheng-wei Fei  (费成巍)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guang-chen Bai  (白广忱)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-wei Fei  (费成巍).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(51175017) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(YWF-12-RBYJ-008) supported by the Innovation Foundation of Beihang University for PhD Graduates, China; Project(20111102110011) supported by the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fei, Cw., Bai, Gc. Distributed collaborative extremum response surface method for mechanical dynamic assembly reliability analysis. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 2414–2422 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1751-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1751-0

Key words

Search

Navigation