Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization model of unascertained measurement for underground mining method selection and its application

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimization model of underground mining method selection was established on the basis of the unascertained measurement theory. Considering the geologic conditions, technology, economy and safety production, ten main factors influencing the selection of mining method were taken into account, and the comprehensive evaluation index system of mining method selection was constructed. The unascertained evaluation indices corresponding to the selected factors for the actual situation were solved both qualitatively and quantitatively. New measurement standards were constructed. Then, the unascertained measurement function of each evaluation index was established. The index weights of the factors were calculated by entropy theory, and credible degree recognition criteria were established according to the unascertained measurement theory. The results of mining method evaluation were obtained using the credible degree criteria, thus the best underground mining method was determined. Furthermore, this model was employed for the comprehensive evaluation and selection of the chosen standard mining methods in Xinli Gold Mine in Sanshandao of China. The results show that the relative superiority degrees of mining methods can be calculated using the unascertained measurement optimization model, so the optimal method can be easily determined. Meanwhile, the proposed method can take into account large amount of uncertain information in mining method selection, which can provide an effective way for selecting the optimal underground mining method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ALPAY S, YAVUZ M. Underground mining method selection by decision making tools [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(2): 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WANG Xin-min, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Qin-li. Mining method choice based on AHP and fuzzy mathematics [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(5): 875–880. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. FREIDIN A M, TAPSIEV A P, USKOV V A, NAZAROVA L A, ZAPOROZHTSEV A A, SERGUNIN M P. Reequipment and development of mining method at Zapolyarny Mine [J]. Journal of Mining Science, 2007, 43(3): 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GLIGORIC Z, BELJIC C, SIMEUNOVIC V. Shaft location selection at deep multiple orebody deposit by using fuzzy TOPSIS method and network optimization [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(2): 1408–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. GURAY C, CELEBI N, ATALAY V, PASAMEHMETOGLU A G. Ore-age: A hybrid system for assisting and teaching mining method selection [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2003, 24(3): 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. NAGHADEHI M Z, MIKAEIL R, ATAEI M. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(4): 8218–8226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHEN Ri-hui, XIONG Da-min. Application of grey association analysis in optimization of mining method [J]. Yunnan Metallurgy, 2002, 31(4): 6–9. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. CARVALHO J F, HENRIQUES P, FALE P, LUIS G. Decision criteria for the exploration of ornamental-stone deposits: Application to the marbles of the Portuguese estremoz anticline [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(8): 1306–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ZHANG Chun-lei, XU Shui-tai. Optimum of fuzzy multi-objective decision making in the selection mining methods [J]. Industrial Minerals and Processing, 2005, 34(9): 20–23. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. YAVUZ M, APLAY S. Underground mining technique selection by multicriterion optimization methods [J]. Journal of Mining Science, 2008, 44(4): 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. WU Ai-xiang, ZHANG Wei-feng, GUO Li. Application of the similarity ratio value engineering method in optimization of mining method [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology: Natural Science, 2000, 31(4): 294–296. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. HUANG X, HASSANI F, LAKSHMANAN V S. Knowledge-base management system for mine design and evaluation [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 7(4): 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. WANG Guang-yuan. Uncertainty information and its mathematical treatment [J]. Journal of Harbin Architecture and Engineering Institute, 1990, 23(4): 52–58. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. DONG Long-jun, PENG Gang-jian, FU Yu-hua, BAI Yun-fei, LIU You-fang. Unascertained measurement classifying model of goaf collapse prediction [J]. Journal of Coal Science and Engineering, 2008, 14(2): 221–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SHAMILOY A. Generalized entropy optimization problems and the existence of their solutions [J]. Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 382(2): 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ai-hua Liu  (刘爱华).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2007CB209402) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China; Project(SKLGDUEK0906) supported by the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Ah., Dong, L. & Dong, Lj. Optimization model of unascertained measurement for underground mining method selection and its application. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 17, 744–749 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0550-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0550-0

Key words

Navigation