Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of cyclic behavior of double sand lenses and corresponding liquefaction-induced soil settlement

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-dimensional numerical model was used to explain the liquefaction mechanism of double sand lenses and the corresponding soil deformation due to the cyclic loading. Moreover, in order to investigate the influences of the soil characteristics and input loading data a parametric study was carried out on the essential parameters affecting the soil settlement, and so the variation of these parameters with the corresponding displacements was mainly examined. At last, the results obtained from the numerical analyses of double sand lenses and a continuous sand layer with similar characteristics were compared with those of an estimating method proposed by ISHIHARA and YOSHIMINE. The comparisons show that the settlements due to liquefaction of the continuous sand layer in both numerical and the estimating method are in a good agreement with and are obviously greater than those of double sand lenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SEED H B. Landslides during earthquakes due to soil liquefaction [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(5): 1055–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. PLAFKER G. Tectonics of the March 27, 1964 Alaska earthquake [R]. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Report, 1969: I1–I74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MILLER R D, DOBROVOLNY E. Surficial geology of anchorage and vicinity, Alaska [R]. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1959: 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SEED H B, WILSON S D. The Turnagain Heights landslide, Anchorage, Alaska [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1967, 93: 325–353.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HANSEN W R. Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964, at Anchorage, Alaska [R]. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Report 542-A, 1965: A1–A68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SHOKRI M. Investigation of liquefaction potential in sand lenses [D]. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MIR MOHAMMAD HOSSEINI S M, NATEGHI F. The crack development due to liquefaction of sand lenses during earthquake loading [C]// Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego, California, 2001: 407–413.

  8. PASHANG PISHEH Y. Mechanism of soil deformation due to double lenses liquefaction and critical depth determination [D]. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CUNDALL P. Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua manual [EB/OL]. [2001-07-06]. http://www.itascacg.com/pdf/pub/cundall-pub.pdf.

  10. CUNDALL P. Explicit finite difference methods in geomechanics, in numerical methods in engineering [C]// Proceedings of the EF Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics. Blacksburg, Virginia, 1976: 132–150.

  11. SEED H B, IDRISS I M. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses [R]. Berkeley: Report EERC70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [12] FLAC: Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua. Version 4 [M]. Minneapolis: ITASCA Consulting Group Inc, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MARTIN G R, FINN W D L, SEED H B. Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1975, 101(5): 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  14. BYRNE P. A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore-pressure model for sand [C]// Proceedings of the second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. St. Louis, Missouri, 1991: 47–55.

  15. FINN W D L, LEE K W, MARTIN G R. An effective stress model for liquefaction [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103(GT6): 517–533.

    Google Scholar 

  16. KUDELLA M, OUMERACI H. Liquefaction around marine structures (LIMAS)-large scale experiments on a Caisson Breakwater [R]. Brauncschweig: Technical University Braunschweig, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISHIHARA K, YOSHIMINE M. Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes [J]. Soil and Foundations, 1992, 32(1): 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Pashang Pisheh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pashang Pisheh, Y., Mir Mohammad Hosseini, S.M. Numerical simulation of cyclic behavior of double sand lenses and corresponding liquefaction-induced soil settlement. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 17, 593–602 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0528-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0528-y

Key words

Navigation