Skip to main content
Log in

Strong noise attenuation method based on the multiuser kurtosis criterion

  • Published:
Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strong noise produced by the leakage of electricity from marine seismic streamers is often received with seismic signals during marine seismic exploration. Traditional denoising methods show unsatisfactory effects when eliminating strong noise of this kind. Assuming that the strong noise signals have the same statistical properties, a blind source separation (BSS) algorithm is proposed in this paper that results in a new denoising algorithm based on the constrained multi-user kurtosis (MUK) optimization criterion. This method can separate strong noise that shares the same statistical properties as the seismic data records and then eliminate them. Theoretical and field data processing all show that the denoising algorithm, based on multi-user kurtosis optimization criterion, is valid for eliminating the strong noise which is produced by the leakage of electricity from the marine seismic streamer so as to preserve more effective signals and increase the signal-noise ratio. This method is feasible and widely applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amari, S. I., Varinen, H. A., and Lee, S. Y., 2002, Blind signal separation and independent component analysis: Neurocomputing, 49, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canales, L. L, 1984, Random noise reduction: 54th Annual Internet. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, Session: S10.1, 525–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, J. F., 1989, Source separation using higher order moments: in Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust, Speech, Signal Process, 4, 2109–2112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comon, P., 1996, Contrasts for multichannel blind deconvolution: IEEE Signal Processing Lett, 3, 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comon, P., 1994, Independent components analysis: A new concept: Signal Process, 36(3), 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho, D., 1981, On minimum entropy deconvolution in applied time series analysis II: New York, Academic, 565–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, R. D., and Musacchio, G., 2001, Polarization filter with singular value decomposition: Geophysics, 66(3), 932–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galagher, N. C., and Wise, G. L., 1981, A theoretical analysis of the properties of Median Filters: IEEE Trans on Acoust, Speech and Signal Processing, 29(6), 1136–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, Y., 1998, Criteria for blind deconvolution of multichannel linear time invariant systems: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, Special Issue on Signal Processing for Advanced Communications, 45, 268–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juttern, C., and Hearault, J., 1991, Blind separation of source, Part I: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture: Signal Processing, 24, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juttern, C., and Hearault, J., 1991, Blind separation of source, Part II: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture: Signal Processing, 24, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, M., and AL-YAHYA, 1993, Application of partial karhunerr loeve transform to suppress random noise in seismic sections: Geophysical Prospecting, 39(1), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. Y., Hao, R. F., Ma, J. F., and Wang, H. K., 2007, Separation of noisy mixed image based on wiener filtering and independent component analysis: Application Research of Computers, 24(10), 161–162, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, S., 1989, Theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(7), 674–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadias, C. B., 2000, Globally convergent blind source separation based on a multiuser kurtosis maximization criterion: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, 48(12), 3508–3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadias, C. B., and Paulraj, A., 1997, Blind separation of independent co-channel signals: 13th Int Conf Digital Signal Process, Santorini Greece, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadias, C. B., and Paulraj, A., 1997, A constant modulus algorithm for multiuser signal separation in presence of delay spread using antenna arrays: IEEE Signal Processing Lett, 4, 178–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalvi, O., and Weinsten, E., 1990, New criteria for blind deconvolution of nonminimum phase systems (channels): IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 36, 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shynk, J. J., and Gooch, R. P., 1996, The constant modulus array for cochannel signal copy and direction finding: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, 44, 652–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, A. A., Giannakis, G., and Shamsunder, S., 1994, Multichannel ARMA processes: IEEE Trans, Signal Processing, 42, 898–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touzni, A., and Fijalkow, I., 1997, Blind adaptive equalization and simultaneous separation of convolutive mixtures: Digital Signal Process, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitel, S., 1974, The complex Wiener filter: Geophysics, 39, 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugnait, J. K., 1997, Blind spatiotemporal equalization and impulse response estimation for MIMO channel using a Godard cost function: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, Special Issue on Signal Processing for Advanced Communications, 45, 268–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugnait, J. K., 1997, Identification and deconvolution of multichannel linear non-Gaussian processes using higher order statistics and inverse filter criteria: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, 45, 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van, D. V. A., and Paulraj, A., 1996, An analytical constant modulus algorithm: IEEE Trans Signal Processing, 44, 1136–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., 2004, Blind sources separation based on nonnegative matrix factorization: Electronics Optics & Control, 11(2), 38–41, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. P., and Liu, A. L., 2008, Applications of blind source separation based on independent factor analysis: Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 34(3), 410–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. L., and Zhang, X. D., 2004, Overdetermined blind source separation based on singular value decomposition: Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 26(3), 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zong, T., Meng, H. Y., and Jia, Y. L., Liu, G. Z., 1998, Denoising method based on wavelet packet and forward-backward prediction in F-X domain: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 41, 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Gao.

Additional information

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41176077) and the State Oceanic Administration Young Marine Science Foundation (No. 2013702).

Gao Wei received his Ph.D in Marine Geophysics at the Ocean University of China (2011). He is now a assistant researcher at the National Deep Sea Center, China. His research interests include blind deconvolution, blind signal separation, and seismic data processing methods of higher order statistics.

Liu Huai-Shan is professor and doctoral supervisor of the College of Marine Geo-science at the Ocean University of China. He is also the leader of Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques Ministry of Education. His research interests include high-resolution seismic data acquisition, processing and interpretation, comprehensive research of marine geology and geophysics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, W., Liu, HS. Strong noise attenuation method based on the multiuser kurtosis criterion. Appl. Geophys. 10, 25–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-013-0365-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-013-0365-5

Keywords

Navigation