Abstract
Cropland area has long been used as a key indicator of food security. However, grain yield is not solely controlled by the area of the cropland. Therefore, we proposed a new indicator to assess food security. Results show that from 1992 to 2004, the global cropland area increased by 840 200 km2 (99.4%), but the grain yield increased only by 310 million t (29.1%); and from 2004 to 2015, the cropland area decreased by 39 000 km2 (4.64%), but the grain yield increased by 370 million t (70.84%). This result showed that grain yield was not linearly correlated with cropland area, and delimiting the threshold of cropland protection may not guarantee food security. Combined with further correlation analysis, we found that the increase in the global grain yield was more closely related to the harvested area (R2 = 0.94), which indicated that the harvested area is a more scientific and accurate indicator than cropland area in terms of guaranteeing food security. Therefore, if governments want to ensure the food security, they should choose a new and more accurate indicator: harvested area rather than cropland area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnolucci P, Rapti C, Alexander P et al., 2020. Impacts of rising temperatures and farm management practices on global yields of 18 crops. Nature Food, 1(9): 562–571. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00148-x
Bajwa A A, Farooq M, Al-Sadi A M et al., 2020. Impact of climate change on biology and management of wheat pests. Crop Protection, 137: 105304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105304
Byerlee D, Stevenson J, Villoria N, 2014. Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation? Global Food Security, 3(2): 92–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.04.001
Carlson K M, Gerber J S, Mueller N D et al., 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nature Climate Change, 7(1): 63–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3158
Chen C, Park T, Wang X H et al., 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature Sustainability, 2(2): 122–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7
Chen C Q, Van Groenigen K J, Yang H Y et al., 2020. Global warming and shifts in cropping systems together reduce China’s rice production. Global Food Security, 24: 100359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100359
Cunningham S A, Attwood S J, Bawa K S et al., 2013. To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 173: 20–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.007
d’Amour C B, Reitsma F, Baiocchi G et al., 2017. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(34): 8939–8944. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/pnas.1606036114
Foley J A, Ramankutty N, Brauman K A et al., 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369): 337–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
Gaso D V, Berger A G, Ciganda V S, 2019. Predicting wheat grain yield and spatial variability at field scale using a simple regression or a crop model in conjunction with Landsat images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 159: 75–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.026
Gong S H, Wang S J, Bai X Y et al., 2021. Response of the weathering carbon sink in terrestrial rocks to climate variables and ecological restoration in China. Science of the Total Environment, 750: 141525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141525
Han G L, Tang Y, Liu M et al., 2020. Carbon-nitrogen isotope coupling of soil organic matter in a karst region under land use change, Southwest China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 301: 107027. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107027
Hu Q, Xiang M T, Chen D et al., 2020. Global cropland intensification surpassed expansion between 2000 and 2010: a spatiotemporal analysis based on GlobeLand30. Science of the Total Environment, 746: 141035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotevv.0200.141035
Hu Y C, Su M R, Wang Y F et al., 2020. Food production in China requires intensified measures to be consistent with national and provincial environmental boundaries. Nature Food, 1(9): 572–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00143-2
Hubbard L J, Hubbard C, 2013. Food security in the United Kingdom: external supply risks. Food Policy, 43: 142–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.08.006
Jägermeyr J, Pastor A, Biemans H et al., 2017. Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for sustainable development goals implementation. Nature Communications, 8: 15900. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15900
Keys E, McConnell W J, 2005. Global change and the intensification of agriculture in the tropics. Global Environmental Change, 15(4): 320–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.04.004
Lambin E F, Gibbs H K, Ferreira L et al., 2013. Estimating the world’s potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach. Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 892–901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.005
Li Qing, ZHOU Yong, XU Tao et al., 2021. Trade-offs/synergies in land-use function changes in central China from 2000 to 2015. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(4): 711–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1219-3
Lin M M, Huang Q P, 2019. Exploring the relationship between agricultural intensification and changes in cropland areas in the US. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 274: 33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.12.019
Liu X P, Huang Y H, Xu X C et al., 2020. High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015. Nature Sustainability, 3(7): 564–570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0521-x
Long S P, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu X G, 2015. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell, 161(1): 56–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.019
Luo X L, Bai X Y, Tan Q et al., 2022. Particulate organic carbon exports from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Catena, 209(1): 105815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105815
McNider R T, Handyside C, Doty K et al., 2015. An integrated crop and hydrologic modeling system to estimate hydrologic impacts of crop irrigation demands. Environmental Modelling & Software, 72: 341–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.009
Mechiche-Alami A, Abdi A M, 2020. Agricultural productivity in relation to climate and cropland management in West Africa. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 3393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59943-y
Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F, Erb K H et al., 2013. Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5): 438–444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003
Minoli S, Egli D B, Rolinski S et al., 2019. Modelling cropping periods of grain crops at the global scale. Global and Planetary Change, 174: 35–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.12.013
Petersen B, Snapp S, 2015. What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts. Land Use Policy, 46: 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.002
Phalke A R, Özdoğan M, Thenkabail P S et al., 2020. Mapping croplands of Europe, middle east, Russia, and central Asia using Landsat, random forest, and google earth engine. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 167: 104–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.06.022
Portmann F T, Siebert S, Döll P, 2010. MIRCA2000-Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24(1): GB1011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003435
Qiu B W, Li H W, Tang Z H et al., 2020. How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process? Land Use Policy, 96: 104715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104715
Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Mueller N D et al., 2012. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications, 3(1): 1293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2296
Sacks W J, Deryng D, Foley J A et al., 2010. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(5): 607–620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x
Sakamoto T, Yokozawa M, Toritani H et al., 2005. A crop phenology detection method using time-series MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3–4): 366–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.008
Sannigrahi S, Bhatt S, Rahmat S et al., 2018. Estimating global ecosystem service values and its response to land surface dynamics during 1995–2015. Journal of Environmental Management, 223: 115–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.091
Schierhorn F, Müller D, Prishchepov A V et al., 2014. The potential of Russia to increase its wheat production through cropland expansion and intensification. Global Food Security, 3(3–4): 133–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.007
Schneider A, 2012. Monitoring land cover change in urban and peri-urban areas using dense time stacks of Landsat satellite data and a data mining approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 689–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.006
See L, Fritz S, You L Z et al., 2015. Improved global cropland data as an essential ingredient for food security. Global Food Security, 4: 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.004
Stehfest E, Van Zeist W J, Valin H et al., 2019. Key determinants of global land-use projections. Nature Communications, 10(1): 2166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w
Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A et al., 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418(6898): 671–677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger T C et al., 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151(1): 53–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068
Van Vliet J, Eitelberg D A, Verburg P H, 2017. A global analysis of land take in cropland areas and production displacement from urbanization. Global Environmental Change, 43: 107–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.001
Wang Zhao, Liu Jianhong, Li Tongsheng et al., 2021. Spatial heterogeneity of agricultural science and technology parks technology diffusion: a case study of Yangling ASTP. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(4): 629–645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1196-6
Wu L H, Wang S J, Bai X Y et al., 2020. Climate change weakens the positive effect of human activities on karst vegetation productivity restoration in southern China. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106392
Wu W B, Yu Q Y, You L Z et al., 2018. Global cropping intensity gaps: increasing food production without cropland expansion. Land Use Policy, 76: 515–525. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.032
Yang Jiangmin, Tan Yiming, Xue Desheng et al., 2021. The environmental impacts of informal economies in China: inverted U-shaped relationship and regional variances. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(4): 585–599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1210-z
You L Z, 2012. A tale of two countries: spatial and temporal patterns of rice productivity in China and Brazil. China Economic Review, 23(3): 690–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.10.004
Yu Q Y, Hu Q, Van Vliet J et al., 2018. GlobeLand30 shows little cropland area loss but greater fragmentation in China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 66: 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.11.002
Yu Q Y, Xiang M T, Wu W B et al., 2019. Changes in global cropland area and cereal production: an inter-country comparison. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 269: 140–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.031
Zabel F, Delzeit R, Schneider J M et al., 2019. Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity. Nature Communications, 10(1): 2844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z
Zeng Z Z, Estes L, Ziegler A D et al., 2018. Highland cropland expansion and forest loss in Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 11(8): 556–562. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0166-9
Zhang S R, Bai X Y, Zhao C W et al., 2021a. Global CO2 consumption by silicate rock chemical weathering: its past and future. Earth’s Future, 9(5): e2020EF001938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001938
Zhang S R, Bai X Y, Zhao C W et al., 2021b. Limitations of soil moisture and formation rate on vegetation growth in karst areas. Science of the Total Environment, 6: 151209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151209
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB40000000, XDA23060100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42077455), Western Light Talent Program (Category A) (No. 2018–99), United Fund of Karst Science Research Center (No. U1612441)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, F., Wang, S., Bai, X. et al. A New Indicator for Global Food Security Assessment: Harvested Area Rather Than Cropland Area. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 32, 204–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1264-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1264-6