Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Regional Ecological Civilisation Construction in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological civilisation construction is a strategy for regional sustainable development based on a regional system of human-land relations. The comprehensive measurement and regional differentiation in construction levels are the key issues of ecological civilisation construction. This study aims to build 35 index systems that coalesce on four aspects: ecological economic adjustment and operation, ecological and social development and progress, ecological resources and environmental security, and ecological institutional and cultural awareness. We measured and evaluated the level of ecological civilisation construction of 329 cities (prefecture-level cities, autonomous prefectures and leagues) in 2018 using a comprehensive evaluation system and a spatial autocorrelation method to assess spatial differences in the level of ecological civilisation construction across China. This approach takes ‘the humanities-economic geography’ comprehensive perspective and uses a GWR (geographically weighted regression) model to analyse 10 influencing factors. Results show that: 1) the level of ecological construction can be divided into five types: higher, high, medium, low, and lower levels, according to the evaluation score. The five types are spindle-shaped in quantity and there is a significant imbalance in their spatial distribution, mainly trending from the southeast coast to the northwest. The land is decreasing, and the southern region is higher in level than the northern region. 2) The results of the spatial autocorrelation method show obvious spatial differences in ecological civilisation construction across China and that the level of ecological civilisation construction is positively autocorrelated. From east to west, the hot zone gradually transitions to a cold zone. A high-high type is mainly distributed in eastern coastal cities of China, and the number of high-low and low-high types are small. The low-low type is mainly distributed in the northwestern and northeastern regions. 3) The effect of influencing factors is heterogeneous in their spatial distribution, and the abundance of ecological resources is the most influential factor. According to the main influencing factors, each region should adhere to the principle of differentiation according to local conditions when choosing its ecological civilisation construction path and establishing an assessment mechanism. This study provides a scientific basis for enriching the regional level measurement of ecological civilisation construction, clarifying the current level of ecological civilisation construction in China, and implementing the regional differentiation path of ecological civilisation construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bebber D, 1999. Spatial autocorrelations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(5): 196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01607-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S, Charlton M, 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47(3): 431–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J S, Stevenson H, 2011. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics, 70(11): 1865–1874. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Sun Wei et al., 2013. Scientific values and research innovations of Human-economic Geography in construction of ecological civilization. Progress in Geography, 32(2):147–160. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz M, Koch M, 2016. Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: structural challenges for a global steady-state economy. Global Environmental Change, 38: 41–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord J K, 2008. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Advances in Spatial Science, 127–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_10

  • Gu ShuZhong, Hu YongJun, Zhou Hong, 2013. Ecological civilization construction: scientific connotation and basic paths. Resources Science, 35(1): 2–13. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M H, Li H, Svarverud R, 2018. Ecological civilization: interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Global Environmental Change, 53: 195–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Tianxiang, Liao Jie, Wei Xiao, 2011. Construction of indictors system for evaluation of urban ecological civilization. Economic Geography, 31(11): 1897–1900, 1879. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Wei, Xi Yongqin, 2016. Research on provincial ecological civilization construction evaluation under the efficiency perspective. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(22): 7354–7363. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao Yuwen, Zhang Yanni, 2011. Eco-civilization’s connotation and practical significance. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(S1): 377–380. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Liu Y, Wang H et al. 2019. Research on the coordinated development of greenization and urbanization based on system dynamics and data envelopment analysis: a case study of Tianjin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214: 195–208 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Daoming, 2009. Study on the construction path and evaluation eystem of eco-civilized city. Urban Studies, 16(10): 80–85. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mi Zefeng, Zhou Can, Zhu Feifei et al., 2018. The path dependence and relationship change of ecological civilization construction: Based on the panel data analysis of prefecture-level cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2003 to 2015. Geographical Research, 37(10): 1915–1926. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • MWRC (Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China), 2018. China Water Resources Bulletin. Beijing: China Water Power Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2018. China Statistical Yearbook for Regional Economy. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2018. China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, 2010. Of laws and limits: an ecological economic perspective on redressing the failure of contemporary global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 20(2): 220–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Weishan, Zhang Yifeng, Yuan Jing, 2013. Measuring and Defining Eco-civilization Cities in China. Resources Science, 35(8): 1677–1684. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Kallis G, Martinez-Alier J, 2010. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6): 511–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum P, 2015. Varieties of ecological economics: do we need a more open and radical version of ecological economics? Ecological Economics, 119: 420–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Geng, Li Sujuan, Ma Qifei, 2018. Spatial equilibrium and pattern evolution of ecological civilization construction efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(11): 2198–2209. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chen X, 2019. An evaluation index system of China’s development level of ecological civilization. Sustainability, 11(8): 2270. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P, 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2(1–3): 37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Jingyi, Zhang Hongju, Chen Li et al., 2018. Conceptualization and evaluation indicators of aquatic ecological civilization based on content analysis. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(S1): 169–175. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao L, Zhao R, 2017. China’s new era of ecological civilization. Science, 358(6366): 1008–1009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3760

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin Y, 2019. Problems and countermeasures of urban ecological civilization construction in China. Environmental Technology, 10(1): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2019.101001

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Shengwen, Li Linjun, Qiu Guoyu, 2015. Evaluation of the eco-civilization construction of Shenzhen based on catastrophe progression method. Ecological Economy, 31(12): 174–181, 195. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Quan Y, Zhong H, 2019. The building of marine ecological civilization and sustainable development: conference report. Marine Policy, 110: 103627. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Cheng J H, Feng Y et al., 2015. An evaluation index system for ecological civilization construction in megacities and its research applications: the case of Wuhan City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(2): 547–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201303220493

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Hao, Sun Jian, Deng Wei et al., 2020. Ecosystem health: assessment framework, spatial evolution, and regional optimization in southwest China. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(1): 142–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1101-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang D Y, 2011. Relationship between ecological civilization and balanced population development in China. Energy Procedia, 5: 2532–2535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Peng, Li Ping, Li Wenhui, 2017. Research on the construction of eco-civilized cities based on moderate population capacity: a case study of Huizhou City, Guangdong Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(8): 159–166. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang Y, Qi Y et al., 2016. Evaluating the trends of China’s ecological civilization construction using a novel indicator system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133: 910–923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Zhiguang, 2019. Development ideology in the new era: the ideology of ecological civilization from the viewsheds of China and mankind progress. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(2): 7–15. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z Y, Li B, Gao M et al., 2010. Preliminary research on quantitative indicators for ecological civilization city construction of taihu lake basin. Engineering Sciences, 12(6): 131–136.doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1088.2010.00432

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Resource and Environment Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, 264025, China

    Yan Du, Weishan Qin, Jianfeng Sun, Xiaohui Wang & Haoxin Gu

  2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Weishan Qin

Authors
  1. Yan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weishan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianfeng Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaohui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haoxin Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weishan Qin.

Additional information

Foundation item

Under the auspices of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 19CGL070)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Y., Qin, W., Sun, J. et al. Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Regional Ecological Civilisation Construction in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 30, 776–790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1145-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1145-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation