Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Productivity: Evidence from Iran’s Food Industry

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the effect of agglomeration on firm level productivity in Iran’s food manufacturing by employing a firm level dataset during 1986–2015 among firms for four districts. The empirical results show that agglomeration in north districts are key factors in productivity growth. In this work, we apply a spatial Bayes model that uses hierarchical techniques during the three terms. The productivity clustering map is able to capture such patterns as the high productivity area that appears in the south, north districts of Iran. This paper evaluates the effect of agglomeration on firm productivity in Iran’s food industries at district level. We find that regional market potential is the strong predictor of productivity; moreover, industrial agglomeration has a productivity-augmenting impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aw B Y, Lee Y, 2008. Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 75(1): 167–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard A B, Jensen J B, 2004. Exporting and productivity in the USA. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(3): 343–357. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grh020

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J, York J, Mollié A, 1991. Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00116466

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Borgman B, 2006. Agglomeration, Diversity and Regional Growth. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes P P, Duranton G, Gobillon L et al., 2010. Estimating agglomeration economies with history, geology, and worker effects. In: Glaeser E L (ed). Agglomeration Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doms M E, 1992. Estimating Capital Efficiency Schedules Within Production Functions. WORKING papers, 92–4, U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumais G, Ellison G, Glaeser E L, 2002. Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 193–204. doi: 10.1162/003465302317411479

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Puga D, 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4: 2063–2117. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Glaeser E L, 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 889–927. doi: 10.1086/262098

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Gleaser E, Kerr w, 2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economiv Review, 105: 889–927. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans A W, 1986. Comparisons of agglomeration: or what Chinitz really said. Urban Studies, 23(5): 387–389. doi: 10.1080/00420988620080561

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser E J, 2002. Tracing the sources of local external economies. Urban Studies, 39(13): 2485–2506. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000027077

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, 1989. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J F, 1996. Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10(4): 339–378. doi: 10.1006/jjie.1996.0021

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P R, Venables A J, 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin J B, Stern H S et al., 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P A, 1998. An applied econometrician’s view of large company performance. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(3): 271–294. doi: 10.1023/A:1007725026859

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E L, Kerr W R, Ponzetto G A M, 2010. Clusters of entre-preneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1): 150–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath M, Pick D, Li Y H, 2004. An empirical analysis of productivity growth and industrial concentration in US manufacturing. Applied Economics, 36(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/0003684042000177143

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham D J, 2007. Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(3): 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M, Hornbeck R, Moretti E, 2010. Identifying agglomeration spillovers: evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. Journal of Political Economy, 118(3): 536–598. doi: 10.1086/653714

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashiguchi Y, Chen K H, 2012. Assessing Agglomeration Economies in the Yangzi River Delta, China: A Bayesian Spatial Econometric Approach. IDE Discussion Papers 339, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, Chiba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J V, Shalizi Z, Venables A J, 2001. Geography and development. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1): 81–105. doi: 10.1093/jeg/1.1.81

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J V, 2003. Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1): 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Huergo E, Jaumandreu J, 2004. Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4): 541–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.12.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W, 1956. Regional Science, The Concept of Region, And Regional Structure, Papers in Regional Science, 2(1): 13–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1956.tb01542.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke S Z, 2010. Agglomeration, productivity, and spatial spillovers across Chinese cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1): 157–179. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0285-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein A, Crafts N, 2012. Making sense of the manufacturing belt: determinants of U.S. Industrial Location, 1880–1920. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(4): 775–807. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr023

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S V, Rodrigo G C, 2001. Perspectives on the sources of heterogeneity in Indian industry. World Development, 29(12): 2127–2143. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00084-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S V, Shalizi Z, Deichmann U, 2004. Agglomeration economies and productivity in Indian industry. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2): 643–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.04.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy A, Palangkaraya A, Yong J, 2010. Geographical agglomeration in Australian manufacturing. Regional Studies, 44(3): 299–314. doi: 10.1080/00343400902783248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage J, R K Pace, 2009. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman & Hall/CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan, 208–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley G S, Pakes A, 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6): 1263–1297. doi: 10.2307/2171831

    Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione P, Benedetti R, Lafratta G, 2010. A regression tree algorithm for the identification of convergence clubs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(11): 2776–2785. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione P, Andreano M S, Benedetti R, 2013. Using constrained optimization for the identification of convergence clubs. Computational Economics, 42(2): 151–174. doi: 10.1007/s10614-012-9325-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding S, Venables A J, 2004. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics, 62(1): 53–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal S S, Strange W C, 2001. The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(2): 191–229. doi: 10.1006/juec.2001.2230

    Google Scholar 

  • Selting A C, Allanach C, Loveridge S, 1994. The Role of Agglomeration Economies in Firm Location: A Review of the Literature. University of Minnesota, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts H D, Wood A M, Wardle P, 2003. ‘Making friends or making things?’: interfirm transactions in the Sheffield metal-working cluster. Urban Studies, 40(3): 615–630. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000053950

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Kohansal.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Project of Research Center of Ferdowsi university of Mashhad (No. 40779)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najkar, N., Kohansal, M.R. & Ghorbani, M. Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Productivity: Evidence from Iran’s Food Industry. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 30, 309–323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1087-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1087-2

Keywords

Navigation