Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity of penman-monteith reference crop evapotranspiration in Tao’er River Basin of northeastern China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A non-dimensional relative sensitivity coefficient was employed to predict the responses of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) to perturbation of four climate variables in Tao’er River Basin of the northeastern China. Mean monthly ET0 and yearly ET0 from 1961 to 2005 were estimated with the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith Equation. A 45-year historical dataset of average monthly maximum/minimum air temperature, mean air temperature, wind speed, sunshine hours and relative humidity from 15 meteorological stations was used in the analysis. Results show that: 1) Sensitivity coefficients of wind speed, air temperature and sunshine hours were positive except for those of air temperature of Arxan Meteorological Station, while those of relative humidity were all negative. Relative humidity was the most sensitive variable in general for the Tao’er River Basin, followed by sunshine hours, wind speed and air temperature. 2) Similar to climate variable, monthly sensitivity coefficients exhibit large annual fluctuations. 3) Sensitivity coefficients for four climate variables all showed significant trends in seasonal/yearly series. Also, sensitivity coefficients of air temperature, sunshine hours and wind speed all showed significant trends in spring. 4) Among all sensitivity coefficients, the average yearly sensitivity coefficient of relative humidity was highest throughout the basin and showed largest spatial variability. Longitudinal distribution of sensitivity coefficients for air temperature, relative humidity and sunshine hours was also found, which was similar to the distribution of the three climate variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R G, Perreira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderton S, Latron J, Gallart F, 2002. Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model. Hydrological Processes, 16(2): 333–353. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beres D L, Hawkins D M, 2001. Plackett-Burman technique for sensitivity analysis of many-parametered models. Ecological Modelling, 141(1–3): 171–183. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00271-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, 1979. A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. Journal of Hydrology, 44(3–4): 169–190. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(79)90130-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Jiabing, Liu Yu, Lei Tingwu et al., 2007. Estimating reference evapotranspiration with the FAO Penman-Monteith equation using daily weather forecast messages. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 45(1–2): 22–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers G, Allen R G, 2002. Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(1): 33–45. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015508322413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Qiong, Yu Mei, Yang Xiusheng, 2000. An analysis of sensitivity of terrestrial ecosystems in China to climate change using spatial simulation. Climatic Change, 47: 373–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Lebing, Xu Chongyu, Chen Deliang et al., 2006. Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang basin. Journal of Hydrology, 329(3–4): 620–629. DOI: 10.1016./j.jhydrol.2006.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal R K, 2004. Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: A case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India). Agriculture Water Management, 69(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupet F, Vanclooster M, 2001. Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 243(3–4): 192–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00413-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Dejuan, 2007. Influence of climate change and land use/land cover change on runoff in the middle and upper reaches of Tao’erhe River Basin. Beijing: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Yunfeng, Lu Daren, He Qing et al., 2000. An analysis of direct solar radiation, visibility and aerosol optical depth in South China coastal area. Climatic and Environmental Research, 5(1): 36–44. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • McVicar T R, Van Niel T G, Li Lingtao et al., 2007. Spatially distributing monthly reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation considering topographic influences. Journal of Hydrology, 338(3–4): 196–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulo V, Silva R, 2004. On climate variability in Northeast of Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments, 58(4): 575–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2003.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Guoyu, Yanob T, Momiic K, 1998. An improved methodology to measure evaporation from bare soil based on comparison of surface temperature with a dry soil surface. Journal of Hydrology, 210(1–4): 93–105. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00174-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleimana A A, Tojo Soler C M, Hoogenboom G, 2007. Evaluation of FAO-56 crop coefficient procedures for deficit irrigation management of cotton in a humid climate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 91(1–3): 33–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.03.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong Ling, Kang Shaozhong, Zhang Lu, 2007. Temporal and spatial variations of evapotranspiration for spring wheat in the Shiyang River basin in northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 87(3): 241–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Fangxu, Dong Huiqing, Li Xiong, 1999. Effect of EL Nino on climatic variations in Guangxi. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 15(3): 21–25, 29. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Hao, Xu Shiguo, Sun Leshi, 2006. Effects of climatic change on evapotranspiration in Zhalong wetland, Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science, 16(3): 265–269. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-006-0265-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Chongyu, Gong Lebing, Jiang Tong et al., 2006. Analysis of spatial distribution and temporal trend of reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation in Changjiang (Yangtze) River catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 327(1–2): 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Dianfa, Wang Shijie, 2002. Study on the eco-geo-environment of land salionization in west Jilin Province. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 33(2): 90–93. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Fangmin, Shen Shuanghe, 2007. Spatial distribution and temporal trend of reference crop evapotranspiration in China. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 30(5): 705–709. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Yuelong, 1999. Distribution of Fragile Types of Ecoenvironment and Their Comprehensive Management in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijuan Li.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40571029)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, L., Li, L., Zhang, L. et al. Sensitivity of penman-monteith reference crop evapotranspiration in Tao’er River Basin of northeastern China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 18, 340–347 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0340-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0340-x

Keywords

Navigation