Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical analysis of Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: Gravity model approach

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the basic trade gravity model and Xinjiang’s practical situation, new explanatory variables (GDP, GDPpc and SCO) are introduced to build an extended trade gravity model fitting for Xinjiang’s bilateral trade. From the empirical analysis of this model, it is proposed that those three variables affect the Xinjiang’s bilateral trade positively. Whereas, geographic distance is found to be a significant factor influencing Xinjiang’s bilateral trade negatively. Then, by the extended trade gravity model, this article analyzes the present trade situation between Xinjiang and its main trade partners quantitatively in 2004. The results indicate that Xinjiang cooperates with its most trade partners successfully in terms of present economic scale and developing level. Xinjiang has established successfully trade partnership with Central Asia, Central Europe and Eastern Europe, Western Europe, East Asia and South Asia. However, the foreign trade development with West Asia is much slower. Finally, some suggestions on developing Xinjiang’s foreign trade are put forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken N D, 1973. The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. American Economic Review, 63: 881–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amita B, 2004. India’s global trade potential: The gravity model approach. New Delhi, India: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan S H, Yoon J, 2001. Does the gravity model fit Korea’s trade patterns? Implications for Korea’s FTA policy and North Korean trade. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Haiwei, 2004. Understanding the economic cooperation between Sino-Central Asian countries within the framework of the SCO. International Economics and Trade Research, 20(6): 74–77. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Xuegang, Yang Zhaoping, Liu Xuling, 2007. Free Trade Zone and the export-oriented economy development in Xinjiang—Conception of Urumqi Free Trade Zone (UFTZ). Arid Land Geography, 30(1): 149–155. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff V A, 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassic world? In: Frankel J A (ed). The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel J, David R, 1999. Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(6): 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel J, Wei Shangjin, 1993. Is there a currency bloc in the Pacific? In: Wignall A B (ed.). The Exchange Rate, International Trade and the Balance of Payment. Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairet Tursun, Ye Wenhu, Meng Haiyan, 2000. Great exploitation of the west and the basic thoughts of the great development strategy of Xinjiang. Arid Land Geography, 23(3): 193–196. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmers C, Pasteels J M, 2003. A gravity model for the calculation of trade potentials for developing countries and economies in transition. Geneva, Switzerland: International Trade Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W, 1990. Introduction to Regional Science. Beijing: Higher Education Press. 50–62. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Dong, Wang Haibin, Yang Xiaohuan et al., 2003. Study on the interaction between NDVI profile and the growing status of crops. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(1): 62–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Linyi, Liu Zhaoli, Li Chunlin et al., 2002. Spatial correlation analysis of crop yield in the middle and west of Jilin Province. Chinese Geographical Science, 12(2): 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Ling, Wang Yan, 2004. Empirical test of China’s bilateral trade with the trade gravity model and its policy implications. World Economy Study, 7: 56–60. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann H, 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Holland: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Qingfeng, Jiang Shuzhu, 2002. Study on the Chinese bilateral trade arrangement using the gravity model. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 6: 17–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Haiyan, Zhang Xiaolei, Yang Degang, 2005. Analyze and research of the modern logistics industry development in ALSK region. Arid Land Geography, 28(3): 404–406. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2005. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyhonen P, 1963. A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschafliches Archive, 90: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Bin, Liao Ming, 2004. China’s trade flows and export potential: The gravity model approach. World Economy, 27(2): 4–10. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Chaoxing, Gu Haiying, Qin Xiangdong, 2005. A survey of the theoretical basis of gravity model used in international trade. Nankai Economic Studies, 2:39–40. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J, 1962. Shaping the World Economy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley J, 1998. Why do countries seek regional trade agreements? In: Frankel J A (ed.). The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Xuegang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCS-SW-355)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Yang, Z. & Liu, X. Empirical analysis of Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: Gravity model approach. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 18, 9–16 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0009-5

Keywords

Navigation