Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of arm lymphedema on healthcare utilization during long-term breast cancer survivorship: a population-based cohort study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer treatment–related late effects degrade survivors’ quality of life, independence, and societal integration, yet may be ameliorated, or even reversed, with effective care. Unfortunately, survivors inconsistently receive this care and the impact on their healthcare utilization is unknown. We sought to estimate differences in utilization between breast cancer (BC) survivors with and without upper extremity lymphedema; a common, remediable late effect.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, retrospective longitudinal cohort study of survivors with incident BC diagnosed from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2010. HC utilization was characterized using the Berenson-Eggers Type of Service (BETOS) categories. Outcomes included overall healthcare utilization as well as its compartmentalization into the BETOS categories of (1) Evaluation and management, (2) Procedures, (3) Imaging, (4) Tests, (5) Durable medical equipment, (6) Physical/occupational therapy, (7) Other, and (8) Exceptions/Unclassified.

Results

The cohort included 1906 subjects of which 94% (1800) had records meeting the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up per survivor was 12.8 years (mean, 11, range 1–25 years). Analysis revealed that (1) survivors with BC-associated lymphedema used > 30% more services annually; (2) their increased utilization lessened but persisted for at least 10 years after diagnosis; and (3) this finding of increased utilization extends across all BETOS categories, is further amplified as BMI increases, and cannot be explained solely by lymphedema-directed care.

Conclusions

BC-related lymphedema appears to be an important driver of survivors’ healthcare utilization and guideline-concordant activities to reduce its incidence and severity may be cost neutral or saving.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Early detection and effective management of cancer-related late effects like lymphedema may reduce survivors’ healthcare needs in the decades that follow their cancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guy GP Jr, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR, et al. Economic burden of cancer survivorship among adults in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3749–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Guy GP Jr, Yabroff KR, Ekwueme DU, Rim SH, Li R, Richardson LC. Economic burden of chronic conditions among survivors of cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2053–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR, Guy GP Jr, et al. Medical costs and productivity losses of cancer survivors--United States, 2008-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:505–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “Silver Tsunami”: prevalence trajectories and comorbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:1029–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:271–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez-Pineda I, Hudson MM, Pappo AS, Bishop MW, Klosky JL, Brinkman TM, et al. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood extremity sarcomas: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamaker ME, Prins MC, Schiphorst AH, van Tuyl SA, Pronk A, van den Bos F. Long-term changes in physical capacity after colorectal cancer treatment. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6:153–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes SC, Johansson K, Stout NL, Prosnitz R, Armer JM, Gabram S, et al. Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care. Cancer. 2012;118:2237–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soran A, Ozmen T, McGuire KP, et al. The importance of detection of subclinical lymphedema for the prevention of breast cancer-related clinical lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection; a prospective observational study. Lymphat Res Biol. 2014;12:289–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nesvold IL, Fossa SD, Holm I, Naume B, Dahl AA. Arm/shoulder problems in breast cancer survivors are associated with reduced health and poorer physical quality of life. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin ES, Bowen MJ, Chen WF. Diagnostic accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy in patients with lymphedema: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71:1041–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson K, Branje E. Arm lymphoedema in a cohort of breast cancer survivors 10 years after diagnosis. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stout NL, Weiss R, Feldman JL, Stewart BR, Armer JM, Cormier JN, et al. A systematic review of care delivery models and economic analyses in lymphedema: health policy impact (2004-2011). Lymphology. 2013;46:27–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shih YC, Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, et al. Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2007–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Basta MN, Fox JP, Kanchwala SK, et al. Complicated breast cancer-related lymphedema: evaluating health care resource utilization and associated costs of management. Am J Surg. 2016;211:133–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bar Ad V, Dutta PR, Solin LJ, et al. Time-course of arm lymphedema and potential risk factors for progression of lymphedema after breast conservation treatment for early stage breast cancer. Breast J. 2012;18:219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Specht MC, Miller CL, Russell TA, Horick N, Skolny MN, O’Toole JA, et al. Defining a threshold for intervention in breast cancer-related lymphedema: what level of arm volume increase predicts progression? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:485–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rocca WA, Yawn BP, St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Melton LJ 3rd. History of the Rochester epidemiology project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:1202–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, et al. Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1614–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, Melton LJ 3rd, Rocca WA. Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:1059–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Melton LJ 3rd, Hartmann LC, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Therneau TM, Khosla S. Fracture risk in women with breast cancer: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1196–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cancer AJCo. Breast. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 347–69.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA, Russo SA, Thiadens SR, Taylor ME. The grading of lymphedema in oncology clinical trials. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13:214–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleiss J. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971;76:378–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Norman SA, Miller LT, Erikson HB, Norman MF, McCorkle R. Development and validation of a telephone questionnaire to characterize lymphedema in women treated for breast cancer. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1192–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sturgeon KM, Dean LT, Heroux M, Kane J, Bauer T, Palmer E, et al. Commercially available lifestyle modification program: randomized controlled trial addressing heart and bone health in BRCA1/2+ breast cancer survivors after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:246–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beidas RS, Paciotti B, Barg F, Branas AR, Brown JC, Glanz K, et al. A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an evidence-based exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014;2014:338–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Norman SA, Localio AR, Potashnik SL, Simoes Torpey HA, Kallan MJ, Weber AL, et al. Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:390–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sagen A, Karesen R, Sandvik L, Risberg MA. Changes in arm morbidities and health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery - a five-year follow-up study. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:1111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Armer JM, Radina ME, Porock D, Culbertson SD. Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms. Nurs Res. 2003;52:370–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Togawa K, Ma H, Sullivan-Halley J, et al. Risk factors for self-reported arm lymphedema among female breast cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:500–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dylke ES, Schembri GP, Bailey DL, et al. Diagnosis of upper limb lymphedema: development of an evidence-based approach. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:1477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bazemore A, Petterson S, Peterson LE, Phillips RL Jr. More comprehensive care among family physicians is associated with lower costs and fewer hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13:206–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mahr MA, Hayes SN, Shanafelt TD, Sloan JA, Erie JC. Gender differences in physician service provision using Medicare claims data. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:870–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:1049–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Robins JM. Marginal structural models versus structural nested models as tools for causal inference. In: Halloran ME, Berry D, editors. Statistical models in epidemiology: the environment and clinical trials. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Secord AA, Hasselblad V, Von Gruenigen VE, et al. Body mass index and mortality in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Playdon MC, Bracken MB, Sanft TB, Ligibel JA, Harrigan M, Irwin ML. Weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hussan H, Gray DM 2nd, Hinton A, Krishna SG, Conwell DL, Stanich PP. Morbid obesity is associated with increased mortality, surgical complications, and incremental health care utilization in the peri-operative period of colorectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:987–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smoot BJ, Wong JF, Dodd MJ. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures of breast cancer-related lymphedema: area under the curve. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:603–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rockson SG. Lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a NCI TREC Survivor Center grant U54-CA155850 from the National Institutes of Health. NCI TREC Survivor Center grant U54-CA155850.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Cheville.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. The requirement for informed consent was waived for portions of the study that involved retrospective data from clinical records. Informed consent was obtained from surviving cohort members who responded to the survey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheville, A., Lee, M., Moynihan, T. et al. The impact of arm lymphedema on healthcare utilization during long-term breast cancer survivorship: a population-based cohort study. J Cancer Surviv 14, 347–355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00851-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00851-0

Keywords

Navigation