Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: a validity study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors.

Methods

One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test–retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity.

Results

The test–retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = −0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = −0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = −0.32), and age (β = −0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46).

Conclusions

The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan.

Implication for Cancer Survivors

This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taiwan Cancer Registry. Cancer survival rates in Taiwan. 2009. At: http://tcr.cph.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=A5B3. Accessed 24 May 2013.

  2. Alfano CM, Smith AW, Irwin ML, Bowen DJ, Sorensen B, Reeve BB, et al. Physical activity, long-term symptoms, and physical health-related quality of life among breast cancer survivors: a prospective analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:116–28.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson G. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10:141–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, Paffenbarger RS, Vranizan KM, Farquhar JW, et al. Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:794–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:153–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou PL, Rau KM, Lin CC. Development and psychometric testing of a short version of the Barriers Questionnaire—Taiwan form for cancer patients. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:1071–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin CH, Liao KC, Pu SJ, Chen YC, Liu MS. Associated factors for falls among the community-dwelling older people assessed by annual geriatric health examinations. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18976.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johansen KL, Painter P, Kent-Braun JA, Ng AV, Carey S, Da Silva M, et al. Validation of questionnaires to estimate physical activity and functioning in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2001;59:1121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosker HR, Lencer NH, Franssen FM, van der Vusse GJ, Wouters EF, Schols AM. Striking similarities in systemic factors contributing to decreased exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic heart failure or COPD. Chest. 2003;123:1416–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. May AM, van Weert E, Korstjens I, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Van Der Schans CP, Zonderland ML, et al. Improved physical fitness of cancer survivors: a randomised controlled trial comparing physical training with physical and cognitive-behavioural training. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:825–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. May AM, Korstjens I, Van Weert E, van den Borne B, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, van der Schans CP, et al. Long-term effects on cancer survivors' quality of life of physical training versus physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy: results from a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:653–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loland NW. Reliability of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE). Eur J Sport Sci. 2002;2:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hagiwara A, Ito N, Sawai K, Kazuma K. Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in Japanese elderly people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008;8:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ngai SPC, Cheung RTH, Lam PL, Chiu JKW, Fung EYH. Validation and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly in Chinese population. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:462–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaughan K, Miller WC. Validity and reliability of the Chinese translation of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu RD, Buffart LM, Kersten MJ, Spiering M, Brug J, van Mechelen W, et al. Psychometric properties of two physical activity questionnaires, the AQuAA and the PASE, in cancer patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:30.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dinger MK, Oman F, Taylor EL, Vesely SK, Able J. Stability and convergent validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004;44:186–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Washburn RA, Ficker JL. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): the relationship with activity measured by a portable accelerometer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999;39:336–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin CC, Chang AP, Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS. Taiwanese version of the M D. Anderson Symptom Inventory: symptom assessment in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33:180–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yates JW, Chalmer B, McKegney FP. Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status. Cancer. 1980;45:2220–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moran DS, Heled Y, Gonzalez RR. Metabolic rate monitoring and energy expenditure prediction using a novel actigraphy method. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:MT117–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rapport MD, Kofler MJ, Himmerich C. Activity measurement. In: Hersen M, editor. Clinician's handbook of child behavioral assessment. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2006. p. 125–53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Tryon WW. The reliability and validity of two ambulatory monitoring actigraphs. Behav Res Methods. 2005;37:492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee PH, Yu YY, McDowell I, Leung GM, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Performance of the international physical activity questionnaire (short form) in subgroups of the Hong Kong chinese population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duffy SA, Khan MJ, Ronis DL, Fowler KE, Gruber SB, Wolf GT, et al. Health behaviors of head and neck cancer patients the first year after diagnosis. Head Neck. 2008;30:93–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwon S, Hou N, Wang M. Comparison of physical activity levels between cancer survivors and non-cancer participants in the 2009 BRFSS. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Luctkar-Flude M, Groll D, Woodend K, Tranmer J. Fatigue and physical activity in older patients with cancer: a six-month follow-up study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36:194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen PY, Chang HC. The coping process of patients with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hagstromer M, Troiano RP, Sjostrom M, Berrigan D. Levels and patterns of objectively assessed physical activity-a comparison between Sweden and the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:1055–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schult AJ, Schonten EG, Westerterp KR, Saris WHM. Validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:541–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin YY, Lai YF, Lu HI, Lai YL, Lin CC. Physical activity preferences among patients with lung cancer in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ministry of the Interior Republic of China. Survey summary of women's living condition in Taiwan area, 2011. Available from: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/english/survey.asp. Accessed 24 May 2013.

  36. Van Poppel MNM, Chinapaw MJM, Mokkink LB, Van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40:565–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, van Mechelen W, de Vet HC. Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires: a checklist. Sports Med. 2010;40:525–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:643–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cramp F, Daniel J. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2, CD006145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013;22:186–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital (97TMU-WFH-05). The authors would like to thank all participants in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Chin Lin.

Additional information

Ching-Chiu Kao, MSN, RN, and Chia-Chin Lin, PhD, RN, contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, CC., Lee, KD., Yeh, CH. et al. Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: a validity study. J Cancer Surviv 8, 205–212 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3

Keywords

Navigation