Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infertility, cancer, and changing gender norms

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Recent improvements in cancer detection, treatment, and technology have increased survivorship rates. These same life-saving treatments, however, can lead to infertility or sterility. Oncofertility, an emerging field at the intersection of cancer and oncology, centers on providing cancer patients with the potential to preserve their biological fertility.

Methods

We examine the history of how men and women have been treated for infertility and analyze contemporary studies of how women without cancer respond to infertility.

Results

Both female and male cancer patients and survivors value their fertility, although there is conflicting evidence on the degree to which women and men value fertility. Some studies have found that women and men value their fertility equally while others found that women value their fertility more than men. Gendered norms around fertility and parenthood seem to be changing, which may minimize these discrepancies.

Discussions/conclusions

Although oncofertility is a nascent field, infertility is a historically relevant medical condition that is characterized by gendered narratives and norms. An analysis of the historical evolution of the understanding and treatment of infertility leads insight into modern conceptualizations of infertility both generally and in the case of cancer. Understanding these historical and current gendered influences helps to define the current context in which cancer patients are confronting potential infertility.

Implications for cancer survivors

The insight gained from this analysis can be used to inform clinical practice, offering guidance to healthcare providers approaching cancer patients about potential infertility, regardless of gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. White, middle-class, heterosexual married couples are the most common participants of many empirical studies on infertility in part because they are the social group most likely to seek out infertility treatment. In the last handful of years, however, more research has been done on people of color and infertility. See, for example, Becker et al., Jain, and White et al.

  2. Having a rectal exam ranks fourth. While this experience does not directly deal with male sexuality, being penetrated is usually associated with women, which is in part why this experience is humiliating.

References

  1. Horner, MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009.

  2. Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(9):902–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schover LR, Rubicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA. Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer. 1999;86:697–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wasserman AL, Thompson EI, Wilimas JA, Fairclough DL. The psychological status of survivors of childhood/adolescent Hodgkin’s Disease. AJDC. 1987;141:626–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zelter LK. Cancer in adolescents and young adults: psychosocial aspects in long-term survivors. Cancer. 1993;71 Suppl 10:3463–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rieker PP, Fitzgerald EM, Kalish LA. Adaptive behavioral responses to potential infertility among survivors of testis cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:347–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Green DH, Galvin H, Horne B. The psycho-social impact of fertility on young male cancer survivors: a qualitative investigation. Psychooncology. 2003;12:141–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zebrack BJ, Casillas J, Nohr L, Adams H, Zelter LK. Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology. 2004;13:689–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawshaw MA, Sloper P. ‘Swimming against the tide’—the influence of fertility matters on the transition to adulthood or survivorship following adolescent cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010 Jan 19, Epub ahead of print.

  11. Apple RD, Golden J. Introduction. In: Apple RD, Golden J, editors. Mothers and motherhood: readings in American history. (PAGES) Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh M, Ronner, W. The empty cradle: infertility in America from Colonial times to the present. Johns Hopkins University Press. 1996.

  13. May ET. Barren in the promised land: childless Americans and the pursuit of happiness. New York: Basic Books; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis DC, Dearman CN. Coping strategies of infertile women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1991;20(3):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Domar A, Zuttermeister P, Friedman R. The psychological impact of infertility: a comparison of patients with other medical conditions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14(Special Issue):45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukse MD, Vacc NA. Grief, depression, and coping in women undergoing infertility treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(2):245–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Letherby G. Challenging dominant discourses: Identity and change and the experience of ‘infertility’ and ‘involuntary childlessness’. J Gend Stud. 2002;11:277–88. ref. on pg. 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter J, Rowland K, Chi D, et al. Gynecologic cancer treatment and the impact of cancer-related infertility. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, et al. American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2917–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blech GM. The Practitioner’s guide to the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of women. Chicago: M. Robertson; 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gurevich M, Bishop S, Bower J, Malka M, Nyhof-Young J. (Dis)embodying gender and sexuality in testicular cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1597–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Szasz I. Masculine identity and the meanings of sexuality: a review of research in Mexico. Reprod Health Matters. 1998;6(12):97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mormon MT. The influence of fear appeals, message design, and masculinity on men’s motivation to perform the testicular self-exam. J Appl Commun Res. 2000;28:81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Greil AL. Not yet pregnant: infertility couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inhorn MC. Sexuality, masculinity, and infertility in Egypt: potent troubles in the Maritaland medical encounters. Special Issue on “African Masculinities,” Lahoucine Ouzgane, editor. Journal of Men’s Studies. 2002;10(3):343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daniels CR. Exposing men: the science and politics of male reproduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Becker G, Castrillo M, Jackson R, et al. Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):882–7. 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Census Bureau. Press release: Father’s day. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006794.html. Published June 12, 2006. Accessed March 11, 2010.

  29. Nepomnyaschy L, Waldfogel J. Paternity leave and fathers’ involvement with their young children: evidence from the American ECLS-B. Community Work Fam. 2007;10(4):427–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Horden AJ, Street AF. Communicating about patient sexuality and intimacy after cancer: mismatched expectations and unmet needs. Med J Aust. 2007;186(5):224–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Quinn GP, Cadaparampil ST, Lee JH, Jacobsen PB, Bepler G, Lancaster J, et al. Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5952–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Campo-Engelstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardino, S., Rodriguez, S. & Campo-Engelstein, L. Infertility, cancer, and changing gender norms. J Cancer Surviv 5, 152–157 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0166-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0166-2

Keywords

Navigation