Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The UK Expert Patients Program: Lessons learned and implications for cancer survivors’ self-care support programs

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globally, the enablement of self-care is increasingly being recognised as an essential component of chronic disease management. Within the UK a key self-care policy initiative is the Expert Patients Program. Developed from the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program, this is a 6 week self-management education program for people with different chronic diseases, facilitated by lay volunteers. As an example of a major public health initiative designed to enhance self-management in long-term conditions, this paper draws on evaluations of the EPP and CDSMP and analyzes the implications for the development of similar programs for cancer survivors. There are a number of evaluations of the CDSMP which suggest significant improvement in participants’ chronic disease management self-efficacy and some evidence of healthcare utilization reduction. However, whilst the national evaluation of the EPP demonstrated similar improvements in self-efficacy and health status, there was no significant effect on healthcare utilization. Trials of such programs need to be treated with some caution as participants are often not typical of the general population, and as a complex intervention effectiveness is inherently difficult to assess. Qualitative evaluations revealed that the EPP’s strength was derived mainly through peer support and learning. Nevertheless, a number of contextual problems were identified including recruitment, clinicians’ lack of engagement with the program and inflexible course materials. Lay-led self-care support programs such as the EPP have a significantly positive effect on self-efficacy which could be of benefit to cancer survivors. However, a number of lessons should be learned from the EPP when developing similar initiatives for cancer survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(19):2469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Earle CC. Long term care planning for cancer survivors: a health services research agenda. J Cancer Survivorship 2007;1:64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barlow JH, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions; A review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:177–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson PM, Kendall S, Brooks F. Nurses’ responses to expert patients: The rhetoric and reality of self-management in long-term conditions: A grounded theory study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(7):803–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark NM. Management of chronic diseases by patients. Annu Rev Public Health 2003;24:289–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Willems D. Managing one’s body using self-management techniques: Practicing autonomy. Theor Med Bioethics 2000;21:23–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harwood RH, Sayer AA, Hirschfeld M. Current and future worldwide prevalence of dependency, its relationship to total population, and dependency ratios. Bull W H O. 2004;82(4):251–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wanless D. Securing our future health: Taking a long-term view. London: H.M. Treasury; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ricka R, Vanrenterghem Y, Evers CM. Adequate self-care of dialysed patients: A review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:329–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corner J. Between you and me. London: Stationary Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Venkat Narayan KM, Hoskin M, Kozak D, Kriska AM, Hanson AM, Pettitt DJ. Randomized clinical trial of lifestyle interventions in Pima Indians: A pilot study. Diabet Med. 1998;15:66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health. Self care support: A compendium of practical examples across the whole system of health and social care. London: Department of Health; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Health. Choosing health: Supporting the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness. London: Department of Health; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Health. The expert patient—a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st Century. London: Stationary Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sobel DR, Lorig KR, Hobbs M. Chronic disease self-management program: From development to dissemination. The Permanente Journal 2002;6(2):15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Expert Patients Programme. Latest stats. Expert Patients Programme Update. 2006;16:1.

  17. Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:254–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson PM, Kendall S, Brooks F. The expert patients programme: A paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance. Health Soc Care Community 2007;15(5):426–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorig K, Gonzalez V. The integration of theory with practice: A 12-year case study. Health Educ Q. 1992;19(3):355–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter PL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Med Care 1999;37:5–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC. Longterm outcomes of an arthritis self-management programme. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1315–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barlow JH, Barefoot J. Group education for people with arthritis. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:257–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bury M, Newbould J, Taylor D. A rapid review of the current state of knowledge regarding lay-led self-management of chronic illness. Evidence review. www.publichealth.nice.org.uk: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2005.

  26. Wilson PM, Mayor V. Long-term conditions. 2: Supporting and enabling self-care. Br J Community Nurs. 2006;11(1):6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. NHS Expert Patients Programme. Self-management of long-term health conditions. A handbook for people with chronic disease. Boulder, Colorada: Bull Publishing Company; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Department of Health. Stepping stones to success. An implementation, training and support framework for lay led self-management programmes. London: Department of Health; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care 2001;39:1217–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrell K, Wicks MN, Martin JC. Chronic disease self-management improved with enhanced self-efficacy. Clin Nurs Res. 2004;13(4):289–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Siu AM, Chan CC, Poon PK, Chui DY, Chan SC. Evaluation of the chronic disease self-management program in a Chinese population. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):42–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Swerissen H, Belfrage J, Weeks A, Jordan L, Walker C, Furler J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a self-management program for people with a chronic illness from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian and Greek backgrounds. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Jacquez A. Outcomes of border health Spanish/English chronic disease self-management programs. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):401–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Gonzalez VM. Hispanic chronic disease self-management: a randomized community-based outcome trial. Nurse Res. 2003;52(6):361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dongbo F, Hua F, McGowan P, Yi-e S, Lizhen Z, Huiqin Y, et al. Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shangai, China: randomized controlled trial. Bull W H O. 2003;81(3):174–82.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rogers A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Kennedy A, Lee V, et al. The National evaluation of the pilot phase of the expert patient programme. Final Report. Manchester University: National Primary Care Research & Development Centre; 2006.

  37. Griffiths C, Motlib J, Azad A, Ramsay J, Eldridge S, Feder G, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a lay-led self-management programme for Bangladeshi patients with chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:831–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rogers A, Bower P, Kennedy A, Gately C, Lee V, Reeves D, et al. Process evaluation of the EPP—report II. University of Manchester: National Primary Care Research & Development Centre; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson PM, Kendall S, Brooks F. Patient empowerment in primary care: An evaluation of the Expert Patient. http://perseus.herts.ac.uk/uhinfo/index.cfm?DBE6BC6A-0498-E5D6-6976-4A274729A00F: University of Hertfordshire—CRIPACC; 2005.

  41. Expert Patients Programme. Opportunities for doctors. Update 2006;16:5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shaw J, Baker M. “Expert patient”—dream or nightmare? Br Med J. 2004;328:723–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Gately C. From patients to providers: prospects for self-care skills trainers in the National Health Service. Health Soc Care Community 2005;13(5):431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Gately C. Assessing the introduction of the expert patients programme into the NHS: A realistic evaluation of recruitment to a national lay-led self-care initiative. Primary Health Care Res. Dev. 2005;6:137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fallowfield L. Participation of patients in decisions about treatment for cancer. Br Med J. 2001;323:1144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Braden CJ, Mishel MH, Longman AJ. Self-help intervention project. Women receiving breast cancer treatment. Cancer Pract. 1998;6(2):87–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Larson PJ, Miaskowski C, MacPhail L, Dodd MJ, Greenspan DD, Dibble SL, et al. The PRO-SELF (C) Mouth aware program: An effective approach for reducing chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21(4):263–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Campbell SH, Phaneuf MR, Deane K. Cancer peer support programs—do they work? Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Miaskowski C, Dodd M, West C, Schumaker K, Paul SM, Tripathy D, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Turton P, Cooke H. Meeting the needs of people with cancer for support and self-management. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2000;6:130–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivors in the United States: Age, health, and disability. J Gerontol Ser A: Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:M82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Feuerstein M. Optimizing cancer survivorship. J. Cancer Survivorship 2007;1:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Feuerstein M, Findley P. The cancer survivor’s guide. The essential handbook to life after cancer. New York: Marlowe & Company; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Foster C, Hopinkson J, Hill H, Wright D, Roffe L. Self managing problems associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. Paper Presented at World Congress in Psycho-Oncology Venice, October 2006. Psycho-Oncol. 2006;15(2):S146.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cimprich B, Janz NK, Northouse L, Wren PA, Given B, Given CW. Taking CHARGE: A self-management program for women following breast cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncol. 2005;14:704–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Macmillan Cancer Support. Living with Cancer Course. accessed 18/8/07: http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Get_Support/Ways_we_can_help/Living_with_cancer.aspx; 2007.

  57. Beckmann K, Strassnick K, Abell L, Hermann J, Oakley B. Is a chronic disease self-management program beneficial to people affected by cancer? Aust J Prim Health 2007;13(1):36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Department of Health. Our health, our care, our say. London: Department of Health; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Clark M. Best practice, better practice—A new deal for carers in primary care. London: The Princess Royal Trust for Carers; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wilson PM. A policy analysis of the expert patient in the United Kingdom: self-care as an expression of pastoral power? Health Soc Care Community 2001;9(3):134–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia M. Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, P.M. The UK Expert Patients Program: Lessons learned and implications for cancer survivors’ self-care support programs. J Cancer Surviv 2, 45–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0040-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0040-z

Keywords

Navigation