Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Archaeology, Development and Conflict: A Case Study from the African Continent

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apart from wars, other contexts of social conflict have recently become a setting in which archaeologists are faced with acute, sometimes armed, violence. On the African continent, a region often overlooked in discussions of “archaeology in conflict”, rapid economic development has led to several such scenes. The paper discusses a particularly poignant example from the Middle Nile valley in Sudan, where large dam projects have been met with various levels of opposition by affected populations. Local communities opposing the construction of further planned dams on the Nile are increasingly stressing ‘cultural survival’ and fear of ‘developmental genocide’ as two of their major motivations for fighting these projects. Assuming a close link between the developer and archaeological salvage missions, affected people have started to use the expulsion of salvage teams from their territory as a strategy of resistance—posing an ethical dilemma for the archaeologists who struggle to find a position in the increasingly violent controversies accompanying these contested development projects.

Résumé

Depuis peu, les archéologues ont à faire face à une violence forte et parfois armée dans des contextes de conflits sociaux autres que les guerres. Sur le continent africain, une région du monde que les débats sur « l’archéologie en conflit » laissent souvent de côté, le développement économique rapide a créé diverses situations de ce type. Cet article discute de l’exemple particulièrement poignant de la vallée du Nil moyen, au Soudan, où des projets de barrages géants ont suscité divers degrés d’opposition de la part des populations affectées. Les communautés locales opposées à la construction de nouveaux barrages sur le Nil insistent sur deux motivations principales de leur lutte contre ces projets : la « survie culturelle » et la peur du « génocide par le développement » . Les populations affectées, supposant un lien étroit entre les promoteurs et les missions de préservation archéologique, ont commencé à adopter une stratégie de résistance consistant à expulser de leur territoire les équipes de préservation du patrimoine, posant ainsi une dilemme éthique aux archéologues qui ont bien du mal à trouver leur place dans ces controverses de plus en plus violentes autour des projets de développement contestés.

Resumen

Aparte de las guerras, otros contextos de conflicto social se han convertido recientemente en el escenario al que se enfrentan los arqueólogos con intensa violencia, algunas veces armada. En el continente africano, una región a menudo pasada por alto en los debates de la “arqueología en conflicto”, el rápido desarrollo económico ha llevado a varios de dichos escenarios. El presente documento trata de un ejemplo particularmente emotivo del valle Medio del Nilo en Sudán, donde grandes proyectos de presas se han encontrado con diversos niveles de oposición por parte de las poblaciones afectadas. Las comunidades locales que se oponen a la construcción de más presas planificadas en el Nilo están subrayando cada vez más la “supervivencia cultural” y el temor de un “genocidio del desarrollo” como sus principales motivaciones para oponerse a estos proyectos. Al asumir un vínculo estrecho entre el desarrollador y las misiones de salvamento arqueológico, las personas afectadas han empezado a utilizar la expulsión de los equipos de salvamento de su territorio como una estrategia de resistencia - planteando un dilema ético a los arqueólogos que se esfuerzan por encontrar una posición en las controversias cada vez más violentas que acompañan a estos proyectos de desarrollo cuestionados.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Adams, W. Y. (1992) The Nubian Archaeological Campaigns of 1959–1969: Myths and Realities, Successes and Failures. In Études Nubiennes, Actes du VII e Congrès International d’’Études Nubiennes 3–8 septembre 1990pp. 3–27, edited by Ch Bonnet, Société International d’Études NubiennesGeneva.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. Y. 2007. A Century of Archaeological Salvage, 1907–2007. Sudan & Nubia 11:48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. M. 2003. Merowe Dam Archaeological Salvage Project (MDASP). Sudan & Nubia 7:11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, K.A. 2012. From Dam to Dam: Encounter at the Cataracts. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.” Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 253–268. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

  • Al-Hakem, A. M. A. 1993. Merowe (Hamdab) High Dam and its Impacts. Kush 16:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, E.H.M., M.M. Salih, and O.M.M. Ali 2010. Dams Implementation Unit: The Craft of Sustainable Development Quest in the Sudan. Dams Implementation Unit Booklet.

  • Arazi, N. 2009. Cultural Research Management in Africa: Challenges, Dangers and Opportunities. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 44:95–106.

  • Arthur, C., Mohapi, M., Mitchell, P. 2011. Archaeology and Dam Projects in Lesotho. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 13:231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, C., Mitchell, P. 2012. Lesotho’s Metolong Dam: A Lasting Legacy? The Digging Stick 29(2):4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askouri, A.K. 2004a. A Culture Drowned. Sudan Dam Will Submerge Historically Rich Area, Destroy Nile Communities. World Rivers Review 19(2): 8–9, 15. http://www.internationalrivers.org/files/attached-files/wrr.v19.n2.pdf.

  • Askouri, A.K. 2004b. The Merowe Dam: Controversy and Displacement in Sudan. Forced Migration Review 21:5–57.

  • Askouri, A.K. 2007. China’s Investment in Sudan: Displacing Villages and Destroying Communities. In African Perspectives on China in Africa, edited by F. Manji, and S. Marks, pp. 71–86. Fahamu, Cape Town, Nairobi, Oxford

  • Beck, K. 2003. Livelihood is Agreement: Sharecropping in the Nile Valley. In Le travail en Afrique noire. Représentations et pratiques à l’époque contemporaine, edited by H. d’Almeida-Topor, M. Lakroum, and G. Spittler, pp. 153–172. Karthala, Paris.

  • Beck, K. 2012. Crisis, Innovation and the Social Domestication of the New: One Century of Manâsîr Social History. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.” Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 5–47. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • Bosshard, P. 2009/2010. China Dams the World. World Policy Journal 26(4):43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosshard, P., and N. Hildyard 2005. A Critical Juncture for Peace, Democracy, and the Environment: Sudan and the Merowe/Hamadab Dam Project. International Rivers Network and The Corner House, London. http://www.hlrn.org/img/violation/Merowe%20Dam-Sudan-IRN.htm.

  • Brandt, S., and F.A. Hassan, (editors) 2000. Dams and Cultural Heritage Management. World Commission on Dams, Vlaeberg. http://www.eca-watch.org/problems/asia_pacific/china/culture_dams_forWCD2000.pdf.

  • Bushra, M. El-M. 2006. Endangered Cultures: A Case Study. UNESCO, Merowe Dam. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00148-EN.pdf.

  • Calkins, S. 2012. Agricultural Encroachment in Wadi Mukabrab Area: Policies of Recompense, Differentiation and ‘Tribal’ Belonging. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.” Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 229–251. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • Chirikure, S., Pwiti, G. 2008. Community Involvement in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management. An Assessment from Case Studies in Southern Africa and Elsewhere. Current Anthropology 49(3):467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daffala, H. (1975) The Nubian Exodus, C. HurstLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, C. 2008. The Nubian Salvage Campaign and the Fourth Cataract Rescue: Two Experiences in Comparison. In Actes de la 4 e Conférence Internationale sur l’Archéologie de la 4 e Cataracte du Nil. Villeneuve d’Asc, 22–23 juin 2007, edited by B. Gratien, pp. 225–230. Cahier de Recherche de l’Institut de Papyrologie et d’Égyptologie de Lille, Supplement 7, Université Charles-de-Gaulle—Lille 3.

  • European Committee for Preserving the Middle Nile 2012. Petition to Stop the Dams in Sudan. African Archaeological Review 29:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Failer, E., M. Mutaz, and A. El Tayeb 2006. Merowe: The Largest Water Resources Project under Construction in Africa. Hydropower & Dams 6:68–73. http://www.merowedam.gov.sd/downloads/merowe_int_journal_hyp_dams_farbe.pdf.

  • Gamal, A. 1998. Deconstructing Nubia: Kajabar Damns Entire Ancient Culture. World Rivers Review 13(5):6–7, 11. http://www.internationalrivers.org/files/attached-files/wrr.v13.n5.pdf.

  • Gisema, K.H. 2006. Cultural Resource Management: The Case of the Fourth Cataract Region “Salvage Model”. In Acta Nubica. Proceedings of the X International Conference of Nubian Studies Rome 9–14 September 2002, edited by I. Caneva, and A. Roccati, pp. 127–130. Universitá di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Rome

  • Goodland, R.J.A., and M. Webb 1987. The Management of Cultural Properties in World Bank-Assisted Projects. World Bank Technical Paper Number 62, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • Grzymski, K. 2010. The 1989–1992 Merowe Dam Feasibility Study, an Archaeological Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference ‘The Fourth Cataract Archaeological Salvage Project 1996–2009’. Gdańsk, 2–4 July, 2009, edited by H. Paner, S. Jakobielski, and J.R. Anderson, pp. 67–70. Gdańsk Archaeological Museum and Heritage Protection Fund African Reports 7, Gdańsk.

  • Haaland, R., P. Mitchell, H. Hafsaas-Tsakos, A. Tsakos, E. Garcea, and H.-A. Nordström 2012. Preserving the Middle Nile (Sudan). Antiquity 86:332. http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/haaland332/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlah, D. 2007. Cultural Landscape of Dar al-Manasir. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Archaeology of the Fourth Nile Cataract. Berlin, August 4th—6th, 2005, edited by C. Näser, and M. Lange, pp. 159–178. Meroitica 23, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • Hafsaas-Tsakos, H. 2011. Ethical Implications of Salvage Archaeology and Dam Building: The Clash between Archaeologists and Local People in Dar al-Manasir, Sudan. Journal of Social Archaeology 11(1):49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hänsch, V. 2012. Chronology of a Displacement: The Drowning of the Manâsîr People. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.” Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 179–228. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • Hashim, M. J. 2010. The Dams of Northern Sudan and the Policy of Demographic Engineering. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies 5(1):148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, F. A. 2007. The Aswan High Dam and the International Rescue Nubia Campaign. African Archaeological Review 24:73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildyard, N. 2008. Neutral? Against What? Bystanders and Human Rights Abuses: The Case of Merowe Dam. Sudan Studies 37:19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T. F. (2003) Places That Count: Traditional Cultural Properties in Cultural Resource Management, AltaMira PressWalnut Creek, Lanham, Oxford.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinitz, C. In press. Spaces in Development: The Making and Unmaking of Heritage in Sudan. Archaeologies.

  • Kleinitz, C., and C. Näser 2011. The Loss of Innocence: Political and Ethical Dimensions of the Merowe Dam Archaeological Salvage Project at the Fourth Nile Cataract (Sudan). Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 13(2–3) (special issue: Sub-Saharan Africa):253–280.

  • Kleinitz, C., and C. Näser (editors) 2012. “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.” Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • Lahmeyer International. 2002. Environmental Assessment Report for Merowe Dam Project. Lahmeyer International, Unpublished Report.

  • Lawler, A. 2006. Damming Sudan. Global Apathy Threatens a Way of Life and an Unexpectedly Rich Heritage. Archaeology 59(6): 36–41, abstract downloadable at http://www.archaeology.org/0611/abstracts/sudan.html.

  • Leclant, J. 1990. Rapport sur une mission de l’UNESCO pour l’étude archéologique de la zone de la IV e cataracte du Nil. Unpublished Report to UNESCO.

  • Leturcq, J.-G. 2009. Heritage-Making and Policies of Identity in the “Post-Conflict Reconstruction” of Sudan. In Pratiques du patrimoine en Égypte et au Soudan, special edition of Égypte/Monde arabe, troisième série 5-6, edited by O. Aboukorah, and J.-G. Leturcq. http://ema.revues.org/index2904.html.

  • MacEachern, S. 2010. Seeing Like an Oil Company’s CHM Programme. Exxon and Archaeology on the Chad Export Project. Journal of Social Archaeology 10(3):347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, K., P. Bosshard, and N. Brewer 2009. Exporting Dams: China’s Hydropower Industry Goes Global. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (Supplement 3):S294–S392. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/23460056_Exporting_dams_%20China%27s_hydropower_industry_goes_global.

  • Naffé, B.O.M., R. Lanfranchi, and N. Schlanger (editors) 2008. L’archéologie préventive en Afrique. Enjeux et perspectives. Actes du colloque de Nouakchott, 1 er –3 février 2007. Editions Sépia, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés.

  • Näser, C., and C. Kleinitz 2010a. The Merowe Dam Archaeological Salvage Project at the Fourth Nile Cataract: Salvage Archaeology in the Context of Major Development Projects in Africa. In Proceedings of the International Conference ‘The Fourth Cataract Archaeological Salvage Project 1996–2009’. Gdańsk, 2–4 July, 2009, edited by H. Paner, S. Jakobielski, and J.R. Anderson, pp. 109–116. Gdańsk Archaeological Museum and Heritage Protection Fund African Reports 7, Gdańsk

  • Näser, C., and C. Kleinitz 2010b. The Role of Archaeology in the Context of Contested Development Projects: A Case Study from the African Continent. In Proceedings of the International Conference on “Archaeology in Conflict”, Vienna, 6 to 10 April 2010, Forum Archaeologiae 55(VI), edited by F.T. Schipper, and M.T. Bernhardsson. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/elisabeth.trinkl/forum/forum0610/55naeser.htm.

  • Näser, C., and C. Kleinitz 2012. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: A Case Study on the Politicisation of Archaeology and its Consequences from Northern Sudan. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 269–304. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

  • Nicholas, G.P., and T.D. Andrews (editors) 1997. At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada. Archaeology Press, SFU, Burnaby, B.C.

  • Paner, H. 1998. The Hamdab Dam Project. Preliminary Report of Results from Work in the Fourth Cataract Region, 1996–1997. In Gdańsk Archaeological Museum African Reports 1, edited by H. Paner, pp. 115–132. Gdańsk

  • Perring, D., and S. van der Linde (editors) 2009. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11(3–4) (special issue: Archaeology and Conflict).

  • Perring, D., and S. van der Linde 2009. The Politics and Practice of Archaeology in Conflict. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11(3–4) (special issue: Archaeology and Conflict):197–213.

  • Pyburn, K. A. (2007) Archaeology as Activism. In Cultural Heritage and Human Rightspp. 172–183, edited by H Silverman, and DF Ruggles, SpringerNew York.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ronayne, M. 2008. Commitment, Objectivity and Accountability to Communities: Priorities for 21st-Century Archaeology. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 10(4):367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salih, A. M. (1999) The Manasir of Northern Sudan: Land and People, A Riverain Society and Resource ScarcityRüdiger Köppe, Cologne.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, F., and M.T. Bernhardsson (editors) 2010. Archaeology in Conflict. Forum Archaeologiae 55:(VI). http://farch.net/.

  • Schmidt, P. in press. Human Rights, Culture, and Dams: A New Global Perspective. In Damming the Past: Dams and Cultural Heritage Management, edited by S.A. Brandt, and F. Hassan, pp. 79–90. Lexington Books, Lanham.

  • Starzmann, M.T., R. Bernbeck, and S. Pollock (editors) 2008. Archaeologies 4(3) (special issue: Imperial Inspections: Archaeology, War and Violence).

  • Taboroff, J., and C.C. Cook 1993. Cultural Property and Environmental Assessment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Handbook. AFTES Environmental Assessment Working Paper 4. World Bank, New York. http://www.wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/11/10/000094946_00102605333821/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf.

  • Teodoru, C., A. Wüest, and B. Wehrli 2006. Independent Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Merowe Dam Project (Nile River, Sudan). EAWAG, Kastanienbaum. (www.eawag.ch/medien/bulletin/archiv/2006/20060323/Independent-Review-20060323-Short.pdf).

  • UNEP 2007. Dams and Development. Relevant Practices for Improved Decision Making. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). http://www.unep.org/pdf/dams/compendium.pdf.

  • Welsby, D. 2000. The Amri to Kirbekan Survey 1999. Sudan & Nubia 4:51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsby, D. 2008. Dams on the Nile: From Aswan to the Fourth Cataract. Sudan Studies 37:5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsby, D. 2009. The Merowe Dam Archaeological Salvage Project. In Between the Cataracts. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Nubian Studies, Warsaw University, 27 August–2 September 2006. Part One: Main Papers, edited by W. Godlewski, and A. Łajtar, pp. 33–47. Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean Supplement Series 2(1), Warsaw University Press, Warsaw.

  • Welsby, D.A., N. Spencer, T. Sweek, G. Tench, M.S. Bashir, and el-H.A. Mohammed 2011. Assessment of the Impact of the Dal and Kajbar Dams on the Archaeological Heritage of Northern Sudan. Mission 6th—18th March 2011. Unpublished Report Submitted to the Dams Implementation Unit June 2011.

  • Weschenfelder, P. 2012. Manâsîr Women’s Contributions to Economic and Social Life: A Case Study from Kirbekân in Dâr al-Manâsîr. In “Nihna nâs al-baharWe are the People of the River.Ethnographic Research in the Fourth Nile Cataract Region, Sudan, edited by C. Kleinitz, and C. Näser, pp. 75–87. Meroitica 26, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

  • World Commission on Dams 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams. Earthscan Publications, London, Sterling.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The point of departure for this paper was a talk given at the 2010 Vienna conference on “Archaeology in Conflict”; an extended summary of this talk has been published in the conference proceedings in Forum Archaeologiae 55/VI (Näser and Kleinitz 2010b). The argument has been expanded on in Kleinitz and Näser 2011, and Näser and Kleinitz 2012. The present contribution includes further aspects of the study, which had been presented at various conferences over the past few years, starting with the 6th World Archaeological Congress (WAC6) in June 2008. Part of the research was undertaken within the study group ‘Archaeotopia’ of the Berlin Excellence Cluster TOPOI (Research Groups CSG-V and C-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Näser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinitz, C., Näser, C. Archaeology, Development and Conflict: A Case Study from the African Continent. Arch 9, 162–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-013-9227-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-013-9227-2

Key Words

Navigation