Skip to main content
Log in

Local decision making and decision fusion in hierarchical levels

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hierarchical problem solving is preferred when the problem is overwhelmingly complicated. In such a case, the problem should better be analyzed in hierarchical levels. At each level, some temporary solutions are obtained; then a suitable decision fusion technique is used to merge the temporary solutions for the next level. The hierarchical framework proposed in this study depends on reutilization or elimination of previous level local agents that together perform the decisions due to a decision-fusion technique: a performance criterion is set for local agents. The criterion checks the success of agents in their local regions. An agent satisfying this criterion is reutilized in the next level, whereas an agent not successful enough is removed from the agent pool in the next level. In place of a removed agent, a number of new local agents are developed. This framework is applied on a fault detection problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Zeng D-Z, Shishido H (2002) Group decision with inconsistent knowledge. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A 32(6):670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 31:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh VN, Nakamori Y (2005) A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making under linguistic assessments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 35:184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Shi C, Zhang G (2006) On bilevel multi-follower decision making: general framework and solutions. Inf Sci 176:1607–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2004) Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput Oper Res 31:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal BB, Biswas A (2004) A fuzzy multilevel programming method for hierarchical decision making. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference: neural information processing (ICONIP 2004), pp 904–911

  • Pasi G, Yager RR (2003) Modeling the concept of fuzzy majority opinion. In: Fuzzy sets and systems IFSA 2003, 10th international fuzzy systems association world congress, Istanbul, Turkey. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pasi G, Yager RR (2006) Modelling the concept of majority opinion in group decision making. Inf Sci 176:390–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman AFR, Fairhurst MC (1998) A novel confidence-based framework for multiple expert decision fusion. In: Proceedings of 9th British machine vision conference (BMVC 1998), vol 2, pp 205–213

  • Schuldt A, Werner S (2007) A clustering protocol for team formation based on concept location and time. In: 5th European workshop on multi-agent systems (EUMAS 2007), Hammamet, Tunisia

  • Simon HA, Dantzig GB, Hogarth R (1986) Decision making and problem solving. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiporkova E, Boeva V (2006) Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment. Inf Sci 176:2673–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban E, Aronson JE, Liang T-P (2005) Decision support systems and intelligent systems. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Umano M, Hatono I, Tamura H (1998) Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 28(2):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veeravalli V (1992) Topics in decentralized detection. Doctor of philosophy thesis in electrical engineering, Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

  • Viedma H, Martinez L, Mata F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(5):644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-M, Parkan C (2006) Two new approaches for assessing the weights of fuzzy opinions in group decision analysis. Inf Sci 176:3538–3555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2006) An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decis Support Syst 41:488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu DL, Liu J, Yang JB (2007) Inference and learning methodology of belief-rule-based expert system for pipeline leak detection. Expert Syst Appl 32(1):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulaş Beldek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beldek, U., Leblebicioğlu, K. Local decision making and decision fusion in hierarchical levels. TOP 17, 44–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-009-0088-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-009-0088-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation