Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: a review

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Claeskens G, Consentino F (2008) Variable selection with incomplete covariate data. Biometrics 64:1062–1069

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward MG, Carpenter JR (2009) Multiple imputation. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Longitudinal data analysis: a handbook of modern statistical methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 477–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs G, Verbeke G, Kenward MG (2009) Sensitivity analysis for incomplete data. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Longitudinal data analysis: a handbook of modern statistical methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 501–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotnitzky A (2009) Inverse probability weighted methods. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Longitudinal data analysis: a handbook of modern statistical methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 453–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1978) Multiple imputation in sample surveys: a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. In: Proceedings of the survey research methods section of the American statistical association, pp 20–34. Also in Imputation and editing of faulty or missing survey data. U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 1–23

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Ugarte.

Additional information

This comment refers to the invited paper available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0138-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ugarte, M.D. Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: a review. TEST 18, 44–46 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0139-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0139-9

Keywords

Navigation