Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis, with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the effects of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we analyzed the outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) with and without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2014, 605 consecutive patients underwent AVR for AS. Of these, the 275 who received isolated AVR (Group A) and the 122 who received both AVR and CABG (Group AC) patients were enrolled, after the exclusion of 8 patients who underwent reoperation and 200 who received other concomitant surgery. AVR and all bypass anastomoses were performed under intermittent retrograde cold blood cardioplegia. Multivariate analysis was used to assess any association of concomitant CABG with morbidity and mortality. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess all-cause mortality.

Results

No significant difference in 30-day mortality was found between Group A and Group AC (1.5% vs. 0.8%, P = 1.000). Nor did post-discharge survival differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.20). Likewise, multivariate analysis showed that concomitant CABG was not associated with significantly greater in-hospital or mid-term mortality. Operative morbidities were comparable between the two groups, in terms of stroke (1.8% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.466), prolonged ventilation (4.0% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.565), deep sternal infection (1.8% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.466), and acute renal failure (0.4% vs. 1.6% P = 0.176).

Conclusions

Concomitant CABG at the time of AVR was performed without increasing early- or mid-term mortality. This absence of increased risk deserves consideration when choosing between different treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KvidalP, BergströmR, HörteLG, StåhleE. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(3):747–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MullanyCJ, ElvebackLR, FryeRL, PluthJR, EdwardsWD, OrszulakTA, DanielsonGK, et al. Coronary artery disease and its management: influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10(1):66–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JonesM, SchofieldPM, BrooksNH, DarkJF, MoussalliH, DeiraniyaAK, LawsonRA, et al. Aortic valve replacement with combined myocardial revascularisation. Br Heart J. 1989;62(1):9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. ThaljiNM, SuriRM, DalyRC, GreasonKL, DearaniJA, StulakJM, JoyceLD, et al. The prognostic impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during aortic valve surgery: implications for revascularization in the transcatheter era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(2):451–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. BerndtTB, HancockEW, ShumwayNE, HarrisonDC. Aortic valve replacement with and without coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 1974;50(5):967–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EdwardsFH, PetersonED, CoombsLP, DeLongER, JamiesonWR, ShroyerALW, et al. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(3):885–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. KobayashiKJ, WilliamsJA, NwakanmaL, GottVL, BaumgartnerWA, ConteJV. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(3):969–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carnero-AlcázarM, Reguillo-LacruzF, AlswiesA, Villagrán-MedinillaE, Maroto-CastellanosLC, Rodríguez-HernándezJ. Short- and mid-term results for aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(4):549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JamiesonWR, YeJ, HigginsJ, CheungA, FradetGJ, SkarsgardP, GermannE, et al. Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival with aortic valve replacement: assessment to 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(1):51–8(discussion 59).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DunningJ, GaoH, ChambersJ, MoatN, MurphyG, PaganoD, RayS, RoxburghJ, et al. Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use—an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(4):776–82.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. GunayR, SensozY, KayaciogluI, TuygunAK, BalciAY, KisaU, et al. Is the aortic valve pathology type different for early and late mortality in concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(4):630–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dell’AmoreA, AquinoTM, PagliaroM, LamarraM, ZussaC. Aortic valve replacement with and without combined coronary bypass grafts in very elderly patients: early and long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(3):491–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. deWaardGA, JansenEK, deMulderM, VonkAB, UmansVA. Long-term outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement and concomitant AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting. Neth Heart J. 2012;20(3):110–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. AbelNJ, RogalGJ, BurnsP, SaundersCR, ChamberlainRS. Aortic valve replacement with and without coronary artery bypass graft surgery in octogenarians: is it safe and feasible?Cardiology. 2013;124(3):163–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BeachJM, MihaljevicT, SvenssonLG, RajeswaranJ, MarwickT, GriffinB, et al. Coronary artery disease and outcomes of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;26(8):837–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. RahimtoolaSH. The year in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;20(19):1948–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. AsaiT, TabataS. Skeletonization of the right gastroepiploic artery using an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5):1715–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-SarrafN, ThalibL, HughesA, HoulihanM, TolanM, YoungV, et al. Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low-and high-risk cardiac patients. Int J Surg. 2011;9(1):104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MenascheP, PiwnicaA. Cardioplegia by way of the coronary sinus for valvular and coronary surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(2):628–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. GallSJr, LoweJE, WolfeWG, OldhamHNJr, VanTrigtP3rd, GlowerDD. Efficacy of the internal mammary artery in combined aortic valve replacement-coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(2):524–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Piers Vigars for reviewing our manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tohru Asai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakakura, R., Asai, T., Suzuki, T. et al. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis, with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67, 510–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-1053-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-1053-4

Keywords

Navigation