Abstract
Introduction
Streptococcus bovis can lead to bacteraemia, septicaemia, and ultimately endocarditis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term implications of S. bovis endocarditis on cardiac morbidity and mortality.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed between January 2000 and March 2009 to assess all patients diagnosed with S. bovis bacteraemia from the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust. The primary end-point for cardiac investigations was the presence of endocarditis. Secondary end-points included referral for cardiac surgery and overall mortality.
Results
Sixty-one positive S. bovis blood cultures from 43 patients were included. Following echocardiography, seven patients were diagnosed with infective endocarditis (16.3 % of total patients); four patients (9.3 %) had native valve involvement while three (7.0 %) had prosthetic valve infection. Five of these seven patients had more than one positive S. bovis culture (71.4 %). Three had significant valve dysfunction that warranted surgical repair/replacement, one of whom was unfit for surgery. There was a 100 % recurrence rate amongst the valve replacement patients (n = 2) and six patients with endocarditis had colorectal pathology. Patients with endocarditis had similar long-term survival as those with non-endocarditic bacteraemia (57.1 % alive vs. 50 % of non-endocarditis patients, p = 0.73).
Conclusion
Streptococcus bovis endocarditis patients tended to have pre-existing valvular heart disease and those with prosthetic heart valves had higher surgical intervention and relapse rates. These patients experienced a higher rate of co-existing colorectal pathology but currently have reasonable long-term outcomes. This may suggest that they represent a patient population that merits consideration for an early surgical strategy to maximise long-term results, however, further evaluation is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Noble C. Carriage of group D streptococci in the human bowel. J Clin Pathol. 1978;31(12):1182–6.
Facklam R. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(4):613–30.
Bleibel W, D’Silva K, Elhorr A, Bleibel S, Dhanjal U. Streptococcus bovis endophthalmitis: a unique presentation of colon cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(9):2236–9.
Goumas P, Naxakis S, Rentzis G, Tsiotos P, Papadaas T. Lateral neck abscess caused by Streptococcus bovis in a patient with undiagnosed colon cancer. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111(7):666–8.
Garcia-Porrua C, Gonzales-Gay M, Monterroso J, Sanchez-Adrade A, Gonzalez-Ramirez A. Septic arthritis due to Streptococcus bovis as a presenting sign of ‘silent’ colon carcinoma. Rheumatology. 2000;39(3):338–9.
McNeal W, Blevins A. Bacteriological studies in endocarditis. J Bacteriol. 1945;49(6):3–10.
Murdoch DE, International Collaboration on Endocarditis—Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):463–73.
Terpenning M, Buggy B, Kauffman C. Infective endocarditis: clinical features in young and elderly patients. Am J Med. 1987;83(4):626–34.
Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, Thuny F, Prendergast B, Vilacosta I, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for infection and cancer. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(19):2369–413.
McKenna AJ, O’Donnell ME, McMullan R, Irwin T. Long-term gastrointestinal outcomes after Streptococcus bovis bacteriaemia. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(11):1203–5.
The Belfast Health and Social Care Trust.: http://www.belfasttrust.hscni.net/about.htm. Accessed on 24 Mar 2013.
Li J, Sexton D, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler JV, Ryan TE. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–8.
Fernandez-Ruiz M, Villar-Silva J, Llenas-Garcia J, Caurcel-Diaz L, Vila-Santos J, Sanz-Sanz F, et al. Streptococcus bovis bacteriaemia revisited: clinical and microbiological correlates in a contemporary series of 59 patients. J Infect. 2010;61(4):307–13.
Ballet M, Gevigney G, Gare J, Delahaye F, Etienne J, Delahaye J. Infective endocarditis due to Streptococcus bovis—a report of 53 cases. Eur Heart J. 1995;16(12):1975–80.
Kupferwaseer I, Darius H, Müller AM, Mohr-Kahaly S, Westermeier T, Oelert H, et al. Clinical and morphological characteristics in S. bovis endocarditis: a comparison with other causative microorganism in 177 case. Heart. 1998;80(3):276–80.
Pergola VE. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of Streptococcus bovis endocarditis with that caused by other pathogens. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(8):871–5.
Tripodi MF, Adinolfi LE, Ragone E, Durante Mangoni E, Forunato R, Iarussi D, et al. Streptococcus bovis endocarditis and it’s association with chronic liver disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(10):1394–400.
Thuny F, Grisoli D, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D. Management of infective endocarditis: challenges and perspectives. Lancet. 2012;379:965–75.
Schlegel L, Grimont F, Ageron E, Grimont P, Bouvet A. Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex and related species: description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp, gallolyticus subsp nov., S. gallolyticus subsp., macedonicus subsp nov., and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:631–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzmaurice, G.J., McKenna, A.J., Murphy, J. et al. Streptococcus bovis bacteraemia: an evaluation of the long-term effect on cardiac outcomes. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62, 142–148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0316-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0316-3