Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Thoracoscopic lobectomy: is a training program feasible with low postoperative morbidity?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of training program in video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy comparing intraoperative and postoperative data of patients operated on by an established consultant and trainees.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomies between May 2008 and May 2012. 66 patients were operated on by an established consultant (Group A) and 34 by trainees (Group B).

Results

The groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and pathological staging. The mean operating time in Group A was 125 ± 30 min and in Group B was 133 ± 26 min (p = 0.18). The rate of conversion was similar in both groups: 9.1 % in Group A and 8.8 % in Group B (p = 0.6). The complication rate was comparable (p = 0.4): 36.3 % in Group A and 32.3 % in Group B. Median time to drain removal and median length of hospital stay was 3 and 5.5 days in Group A and 3 and 5 days in Group B, showing no statistical differences between the two groups (p = 0.3 and 0.5). There were no differences in term of long-term complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our study showed that a training program in VATS lobectomy is feasible, without increasing the operative time, conversion rate, postoperative complication, time to drain removal, and length of hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenna RJ Jr. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:879–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk NP, et al. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:997–1002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:2008–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:455–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:243–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg. 2000;24:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farjah F, Wood DE, Mulligan MS, Krishnadasan B, Heagerty PJ, Symons RG, et al. Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1415–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang X, Wang S, Qu J. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compares favorably with thoracotomy for the treatment of lung cancer: a five-year outcome comparison. World J Surg. 2009;33:1857–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demmy TL, Plante AJ, Nwogu CE, Takita H, Anderson TM. Discharge independence with minimally invasive lobectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188:698–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Christensen M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Flores RM. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: focus on technique. World J Surg. 2010;34:616–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen RP, Pham D, Burfeind WR, Hanish SI, Toloza EM, Harpole DH Jr, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1245–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1644–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Solomon B, Bizekis C, Dellis SL, Donington JS, Oliker A, Balsam LB, et al. Simulating video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a virtual reality cognitive task simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:249–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng T, Ryder BA. Evolution to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after training: initial results of the first 30 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:551–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1903–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan IY, Thung KH, Hsin MK, Underwood MJ, Yim AP. Video-assisted thoracic surgery major lung resection can be safely taught to trainees. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:416–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Andrea Billè, Lawrence Okiror, Wolfram Karenovics, Debajeet Choudhuri & Tom Routledge

Authors
  1. Andrea Billè
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence Okiror
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfram Karenovics
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debajeet Choudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tom Routledge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Billè.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Billè, A., Okiror, L., Karenovics, W. et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: is a training program feasible with low postoperative morbidity?. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 61, 409–413 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0225-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0225-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation