Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of extended esophagectomy through mini-thoracotomy/laparotomy with conventional thoracotomy/laparotomy for esophageal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: In order to assess the usefulness of esophagectomy through mini-thoracotomy/laparotomy as a minimally invasive surgical procedure for esophageal cancer, we compared the results to those of conventional right thoracotomy/laparotomy. Methods: From 1998 to 2002, 40 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer were prospectively assigned to two groups. Twenty patients underwent esophagectomy through mini-thoracotomy/laparotomy (M-group), while the other 20 had conventional thoracotomy/laparotomy (C-group). Surgical complications, the duration of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), postoperative pain, cytokine responses, and respiratory function were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no difference of morbidity between the M- and C-groups after surgery. There were also no differences between the two groups with respect to the operating time, bleeding, and number of dissected lymph nodes. The duration of SIRS was shorter in the M-group than in the C-group (p=0.055). Use of morphine was lower in the M-group than in the C-group with patient-controlled anesthesia (p=0.002) .The interleukin-6 level of the M-group was lower than that of the C-group at 3, 6 hours, and 3 days after the operation. Recovery of vital capacity by the M-group was better than by the C-group after the operation. Postoperative hospital stay of the M-group was significantly shorter than that of the C-group (p=0.014). Long-term survival was not different in the two groups. Conclusion: Mini-thoracotomy/laparotomy reduces invasiveness and pain compared with conventional thoracotomy/laparotomy for esophagectomy without causing any differences of morbidity or long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ide H, Nakamura T, Hayashi K, Endo T, Kobayashi A, Eguchi R, et al. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Pathology and prognosis. World J Surg 1994; 18: 321–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 225–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Suzuki S, Kuwabara S, Hatakeyama K. Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 306–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocar-cinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baba M, Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Kusano C, Shimada M, Kimura S, et al. Appraisal of ten-year survival following esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus with emphasis on quality of life. World J Surg 1997; 21:282–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gossot D, Fourquier P, Celerier M. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: Technique and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 667–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuschieri A. Endoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy for cancer using the right thoracoscopic approach. Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, et al. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 1533–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 1997; 122: 8–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McAnena OJ, Rogers J, Williams NS. Right thoracoscopically assisted oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 236–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson GS, Lloyd DM, Wicks AC, Veitch PS. No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 675–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ide H, Narumiya K, Eguchi R, Nakamura T, Kobayashi A, Ota M. Effectiveness of the Radical Operation with Mini-thoracolaparotomy for Esophageal Cancer, Bologna: Monduzzi editore, 2001: 557–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hermanek P, Sobin LH, ed. UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Guidelines for Clinical and Pathologic Studies on Carcinoma of the Esophagus. Ninth English Edition. Tokyo: Kanehara, 2001.

  15. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864–74.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nation-wide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 1991; 48: 411–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kato H, Watanabe H, Tachimori Y, Iizuka T. Evaluation of neck lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 931–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shima I, Toh Y, Tomita Y, et al. Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 654–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yokota K, Nishihira T, Shineha R, Sayama J, Nitta Y, Kimura M, et al. Association between elevated plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and the degree of surgical stress in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 1995; 25: 579–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Talmor M, Hydo L, Barie PS. Relationship of systemic inflammatory response syndrome to organ dysfunction, length of stay, and mortality in critical surgical illness: Effect of intensive care unit resuscitation. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 81–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato N, Koeda K, Ikeda K, Kimura Y, Aoki K, Iwaya T, et al. Randomized study of the benefits of preoperative corticosteroid administration on the postoperative morbidity and cytokine response in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003; 90:108–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narumiya, K., Nakamura, T., Ide, H. et al. Comparison of extended esophagectomy through mini-thoracotomy/laparotomy with conventional thoracotomy/laparotomy for esophageal cancer. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 53, 413–419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-005-0076-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-005-0076-9

Key words

Navigation