Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emerging market innovations: unique and differential drivers, practitioner implications, and research agenda

  • Conceptual/Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth in emerging markets is critical as it leads global economic growth. Emerging market innovations, which we define as innovations created in an emerging market for use by consumers or customers in that market and possibly other markets, form the engine for such growth and continue to rise in importance for various stakeholders. These innovations fundamentally differ from developed market innovations, and impact consumers, firms, governments, and the society at large. Conceptual research on emerging market innovation has not focused on the differential drivers of emerging and developed market innovations. Most empirical studies have also focused on only one emerging market, not offering generalizable conclusions across emerging markets. Thus, while prior research offers a limited understanding of factors specific to emerging market innovations, not much is known about the unique and differential drivers of emerging market innovations relative to developed market innovations. Our study offers a broader framework highlighting the unique aspects of emerging market innovations, their unique and differential (relative to developed market innovations) drivers, and related practitioner takeaways. Our framework and propositions suggest that different drivers impact the demand and supply for innovations, and, in turn, the number of innovations differently in emerging and developed markets. We outline an agenda for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We recognize that there is heterogeneity within each developed market in per capita income. Consequently, the number of innovations targeted at different income groups may differ.

References

  • Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science, 47(5), 611–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. J., Chandy, R., & Zia, B. (2018). Pathways to profits: The impact of marketing vs. finance skills on business performance. Management Science, 64(12), 5559–5583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (2002). Demand saturation-creation and economic growth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(2), 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. J., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). New strategies in emerging economies. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Ramaswami, S. N., Herrmann, P., & Walker, D. (2018). Innovation pathway to profitability: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), 744–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2015). Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and developed economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2017). Money via mobile: The M-Pesa revolution. Retrieved August 1, 2018 from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38667475

  • Besen, S. M., & Raskind, L. J. (1991). An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borah, B. S., Prakhya, S., & Sharma, A. (2019). Leveraging service recovery strategies to reduce customer churn in an emerging market. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, forthcoming.

  • Burgess, S. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2006). Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(4), 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R., Hassan, M., & Mukherji, P. (2017). Big data for good: Insights from emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • CNN. (2017). India poised for smartphone revolution. Retrieved on August 1, 2018 from https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/26/technology/india-mobile-congress-market-numbers/index.html

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). (Pp. 87–137). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  • Cunha, M. P. E., Rego, A., Oliveira, P., Rosado, P., & Habib, N. (2014). Product innovation in resource-poor environments: Three research streams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2017). India to make massive gains from its demographic dividend. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y9949yte

  • Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • DNA. (2015). Here’s what you need to know about the Digital India initiative. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yahfdyul

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2007). Path to growth: The power of technology in emerging markets. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yaf5494s

  • eMarketer. (2018). China and India Lead in Proximity Mobile Payment Usage for 2019. Retrieved December 25, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yd8oep85

  • Ernst & Young. (2013). Hitting the sweet spot – the growth of the middle class in emerging markets. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y8r84q5t

  • Ernst, H., Kahle, H. N., Dubiel, A., Prabhu, J., & Subramaniam, M. (2015). The antecedents and consequences of affordable value innovations for emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). The determinants of changes in US self-employment, 1968–1987. Small Business Economics, 1(2), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast Company. (2018). Synthetic rhino horns are supposed to disrupt poaching. Will they work? Retrieved February 9, 2019 from https://tinyurl.com/y4p7gw85

  • Feldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Express. (2018). One month old baby gets blockchain secured birth certificate in Bengal. Retrieved December 21, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y8ckl2v3

  • Forbes. (2017). Sub-Saharan African will have 500m mobile users by 2020, already has over half mobile money services. Retrieved August 1, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yaamj266

  • Forni, M., & Paba, S. (2002). Spillovers and the growth of local industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frambach, R. T., Barkema, H. G., Nooteboom, B., & Wedel, M. (1998). Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables. Journal of Business Research, 41(2), 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadiesh, O., Leung, P., & Vestring, T. (2007). The battle for China’s good-enough market. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., & Han, S. P. (2012). How is the mobile internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Innovation Index Report. (2014). The global innovation index 2014: The human factor in innovation. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/ndj8czt

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: Create far from home, win everywhere. Harvard Business Press, Reverse Innovation.

  • Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (1999). Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg, M., Ozkaya, H. E., & Taube, M. (2016). A brand built on sand: Is acquiring a local brand in an emerging market an ill-advised strategy for foreign companies? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 586–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermosilla, M., Gutiérrez-Navratil, F., & Prieto-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Can emerging markets tilt global product design? Impacts of Chinese colorism on Hollywood castings. Marketing Science, 37(3), 356–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede Insights. (2018). Compare countries. Retrieved August 30, 2018 from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/

  • Horwitz, J. (2016). Your brilliant Kickstarter idea could be on sale in China before you’ve even finished funding it. Retrieved December 20, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/kblrcs8

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging markets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (2005). Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective? Research Policy, 34(8), 1220–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDC. (2018). India Smartphone Market sees a healthy growth of 20% in Q2 2018 as Xiaomi retains leadership, According to IDC India. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prAP44210918

  • Jean, R., Sinkovics, R., & Hiebaum, T. (2014). The effects of supplier involvement and knowledge protection on product innovation in customer–supplier relationships: A study of global automotive suppliers in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2008). Drivers of success for market entry into China and India. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., & Rob, R. (1987). Demand-driven innovation and spatial competition over time. The Review of Economic Studies, 54(1), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. F. (2010). The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(3), 473–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2017). The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: An update. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/global_20170228_global-middle-class.pdf

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Nim, N., & Sharma, A. (2018). Driving growth of Mwallets in emerging markets: A retailer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(4), 747–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzents, S. (1966). Modern economic growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBay, D. G., & Kinnear, T. C. (1981). Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Sivakumar, K., & Liu, S. S. (2005). Globalization, marketing resources, and performance: Evidence from China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, J. (2016). Good things come in small packs: Tiny-but-mighty Coca Cola bottle drives growth in India. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yc488yvb

  • Miller, R. (2001). Leapfrogging? The World Bank: India’s information technology industry and the Internet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Mobarak, A. (2014). Learning about new technologies through social networks: Experimental evidence on nontraditional stoves in Bangladesh. Marketing Science, 34(4), 480–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), 102–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). Bottom-of-the-pyramid: Organizational barriers to implementation. California Management Review, 51(4), 100–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Economics. (2015). The battle for competitive advantage in the app economy. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/ycvzo2vl

  • Pedada, K., Arunachalam, S., & Dass, M. (2019). A theoretical model of the formation and dissolution of emerging market international marketing alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, forthcoming.

  • Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. M., & Harianto, F. (1992). The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. A., Kushwaha, T., & Kumar, V. (2015). Marketing communication strategies and consumer financial decision making: The role of national culture. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzini, M. (2012). An emerging middle class. OECD Observer, 288, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2009). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., Gong, Q., & Chen, Y. (2014). Untangling searchable and experiential quality responses to counterfeits. Marketing Science, 34(4), 522–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1997). New and small firms in expanding markets. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28(4), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., O’Hern, M., & Sachdev, V. (2017). The digital revolution, 3D printing, and innovation as data. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 681–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. CUP Archive.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). 1934. The theory of economic development.

  • Shankar, V., & Hanson, N. (2013). How emerging markets are reshaping the innovation architecture of global firms. Review of Marketing Research, 10, 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Kumar, V., & Cosguner, K. (2019). Modeling emerging market firms’ competitive retail distribution strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming, 56, 439–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, R., Moon, S., Chen, H. A., & Houston, M. B. (2018). When marketing strategy meets culture: The role of culture in product evaluations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3), 384–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorescu, A., Warren, N. L., & Ertekin, L. (2017). Event study methodology in the marketing literature: An overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorescu, A., Sorescu, S., Armstrong, W., & Devoldere, B. (2018). Two centuries of epochal innovation and stock market bubbles. Marketing Science, 37(4), 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2018). Number of students enrolled in engineering stream across India in FY 2017, by discipline (in millions). Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yd3atrxp.

  • Story, V. M., Boso, N., & Cadogan, J. W. (2015). The form of relationship between firm-level product innovativeness and new product performance in developed and emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhir, K., & Talukdar, D. (2015). The “Peter Pan syndrome” in emerging markets: The productivity-transparency trade-off in IT adoption. Marketing Science, 34(4), 500–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Waarden, F. (2001). Institutions and innovation: The legal environment of innovating firms. Organization Studies, 22(5), 765–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. (2017). Innovating for sustainability: A framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M., Corsi, S., Søberg, P. V., & Frega, R. (2015). A typology of reverse innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 12–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. S., Samiee, S., & Lee, R. P. (2014). The influence of organic organizational cultures, market responsiveness, and product strategy on firm performance in an emerging market. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(1), 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. (2010). Cost innovation: Preparing for a ‘value-for-money’ revolution. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, A., & Govindarajan, V. (2015). Engineering reverse innovations principles for creating successful products for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 93(7–8), 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIPO. (2018). China drives international patent applications to record heights; demand rising for trademark and industrial design protection. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y6vh4noq

  • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010). Innovation policy: A guide for developing countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Outlook. (2018). World Economic Outlook, July 2018. International Monetary Fund.

  • YourStory. (2018). These youth-led startups are transforming India, one innovation at a time. Retrieved February 8, 2019 from https://yourstory.com/2018/01/youth-startup-innovation/

  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2014a). Organizing for reverse innovation in Western MNCs: The role of frugal product innovation capabilities. International Journal of Technology Management, 64(2–4), 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeschky, M., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014b). From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Ko, E., & Lee, E. (2013). Moderating effects of nationality and product category on the relationship between innovation and customer equity in Korea and China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Sheng, S., & Shao, A. T. (2014). The evolving role of managerial ties and firm capabilities in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(6), 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors and reviewers for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Retailing Studies, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Venkatesh Shankar & Unnati Narang

Authors
  1. Venkatesh Shankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Unnati Narang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatesh Shankar.

Additional information

Rajendra Srivastava and V. Kumar served as Special Issue Guest Editors for this article.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankar, V., Narang, U. Emerging market innovations: unique and differential drivers, practitioner implications, and research agenda. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 1030–1052 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00685-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00685-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation