Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing human brands: determinants of placement success for first faculty positions in marketing

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on primary data spanning 5 years, we examine factors that influence the entry-level placement of marketing doctoral candidates at U.S. universities and colleges. Contributing to the emerging research on human brands, we identify marketing doctoral candidates’ intrinsic and extrinsic brand cues that influence their number of AMA interviews, campus visit offers, and starting base salary. The strongest brand cue is the research productivity of candidates’ doctoral degree-granting departments. A related cue that also predicts initial salary is the candidates’ advisors’ research record. Further, when beginning the job search, doctoral students who have a top research publication, who have a dissertation proposal defended with data, and who have attended the AMA-Sheth Foundation Doctoral Consortium receive a substantial entry salary premium. Based on branding frameworks and theories of academic rewards, this study adds to the emerging knowledge on both the concept of human brands as well as the growing literature on issues relating to marketing academia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMA Marketing Thought Task Force. (1988). Developing, disseminating, and utilizing marketing knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 52, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataman, M. B., Mela, C. F., & van Heerde, H. J. (2008). Building brands. Marketing Science, 27, 1036–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. L. (2008). Scholarly marketing publication: the American Advantage? European Business Review, 20(5), 370–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, A., Vitell, S. J., & Rose, G. M. (2000). Publications in major marketing journals: an analysis of scholars and marketing departments. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauerly, R. J., & Johnson, D. T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, W. J., & Zivney, T. L. (1991). The new hire market for finance: productivity, salaries, and other market factors. Financial Practice and Education, 1, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. (1994). The importance of brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: prestige hierarchies in Ph.D. exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R., & Navaro, P. (1988). A seller’s (& buyer’s) guide to the job market for beginning academic economists. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2006). Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing, 70, 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (2010). Taking stock in Martha Stewart: A cultural critique of the marketing practice of building person-brands. In Campbell, M. C., Inman, J., & Pieters, R. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, volume 37. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research (forthcoming).

  • Gatignon, H., Weitz, B., & Bansal, P. (1990). Brand introduction strategies and competitive environments. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 390–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociology of Education, 44(1), 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C. (1987). People as products: analysis of a complex marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofacker, C. F., Gleim, M. R., & Lawson, S. J. (2009). Revealed reader preference for marketing journals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(4), 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Neese, W. T., & Bashaw, R. E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2009). Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations. Global Edge Business Review, 3(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, V. M., & Clark, D. (1999). Criteria for recruitment as assistant professor of accounting in colleges and universities. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. (1971). Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(6), 570–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C. A. (1988). Preconscious processing effects: the independence of attitude formation and conscious thought. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Aaker, J. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Rao, R. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64, 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforet, S., & Saunders, J. (1994). Managing brand portfolios: how the leaders do it. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(5), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1985). The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Patil, A., & Kim, S. S. (2007). Bias breakdown. Marketing Research, 19(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233–246). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973) [1942]. The normative structure of science. In Storer, N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, National Research Council.

  • Mittal, V., Feick, L., & Murshed, F. (2008). Publish and prosper: the financial impact of publishing by marketing faculty. Marketing Science, 27, 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an informational cue: Effects on product evaluations. In A. G. Woodside, J. N. Sheth, & P. D. Bennett (Eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267–286). New York: Elsvier North Holland, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Schau, H. J. (2010). The ties that bind: Consumer engagement and transference with a human brand. In Campbell, M. C., Inman, J., & Pieters, R. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, volume 37. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research, forthcoming.

  • Seggie, S. H., & Griffith, D. A. (2009). What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, P. M., & MacDonald, D. N. (1989). The job market for finance Ph.D.s. Journal of Financial Education, 18, 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R. K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J., Chandy, R. K., & Ackerman, D. S. (1999). In search of diversity: the record of major marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M. (2006). Human brands: investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70, 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Texas at Dallas. (2010). University of Texas at Dallas School of Managements’ Top 100 Business School Research Rankings, (http://citm.utdallas.edu/utdrankings/home.aspx).

  • Wilkie, W. L. (2005). Needed: a larger sense of marketing and scholarship. Journal of Marketing, 69, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Predicting early career research productivity: the case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Guidry Moulard.

Additional information

The authors sincerely wish to thank the members, leaders, and advisory board of AMA’s DocSIG, especially Annie Cui, Maureen Bourassa, Jody Crosno, Jodie Ferguson, Alex Zablah, and Tom DeWitt. The authors thank Georgia State University for hosting the online survey. The authors also thank the scholars who provided valuable input to this manuscript: Mike Brady, Mike LaTour, Roland Gau, Peter Dixon, Dhruv Grewal, Peter Dacin, Dan Ladick, and Jack Schibrowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Close, A.G., Moulard, J.G. & Monroe, K.B. Establishing human brands: determinants of placement success for first faculty positions in marketing. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 39, 922–941 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0221-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0221-6

Keywords

Navigation