References
Bauerly, R. J., & Johnson, D. T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 313–329.
Monastersky, R. (2005). The number that is devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(8), A12.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497–502 (February 15).
Stewart, D. W. (1999). Beginning again: Change and renewal in intellectual communities. Journal of Marketing, 63, 2–5 (October).
Stewart, D. W. (2002). Getting published: Reflections of an old editor. Journal of Marketing, 66, 1–6, (Oct.)
Stewart, D. W., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Enhancing marketing theory in academic research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 477–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, D.W. New and improved! A look at the future. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 35, 1–4 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0023-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0023-7