Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of drying methods on molecular properties and functionalities of disulfide bond-cleaved soy proteins

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

Effects of drying methods on hydrophobicity, solubility, water hydration capacity, viscosity, and adhesive strength of soy protein isolates treated with Na2SO3 (disulfide bond-cleaving agent) were investigated. Treatment with 0.1 M Na2SO3 resulted in 28% decrease in disulfide linkages in soy proteins. While hydrophobicity and solubility increased, waterholding capacity of soy proteins decreased due to the treatment. Spray-dried product had higher hydrophobicity, solubility, water hydration capacity, and viscosity compared to freeze-dried product. Adhesive strength on wood increased due to modification; however, the drying process had no significant effect on this property. Viscosities of spray-dried product, freeze-dried product, and unmodified soy proteins were 2,200, 100, and 240 cP, respectively. Fluorescence spectra of spray-dried and freezedried products indicated a partial folding of molecules around tryptophan. High-performance liquid chromatographic elution profiles showed no significant differences in molecular sizes of unfolded molecules of spray-dried and freeze-dried proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lambuth, A.L., Soybean Glues, in Handbook of Adhesives, 2nd edn., edited by I.S. Keist, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1977, pp. 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myers, D.J., Industrial Applications for Soy Protein and Potential for Increased Utilization, Cereal Foods World 38:355–360 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hettiarachchy, N.S., U. Kalapathy, and D. Myers, Alkali-Modified Soy Proteins with Improved Adhesive and Hydrophobic Properties, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 72:1461–1467 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalapathy, U., N.S. Hettiarachchy, D. Myers, and K.C. Rhee, Alkali-Modified Soy Proteins: Effect of Salts and Disulfide Bond Cleavage on Adhesion and Viscosity, Ibid.:1063–1066 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinsella, J.E., Functional Properties of Soy Proteins, Ibid.:242–258 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinsella, J.E., S. Damodaran, and B. German, Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Oilseed Proteins with Emphasis on Soy Proteins, in New Protein Foods, edited by A.M. Altschul and H.L. Wilcke, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1985, pp. 113–161.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kella, N.K.D., S.T. Yang, and J.E. Kinsella, Effect of Disulfide Bond Cleavage on Structural and Interfacial Properties of Whey Proteins, J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:1203–1210 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. German, J.B., T.E. O’Neil, and J.E. Kinsella, Film Forming and Foaming Behavior of Food Proteins. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:1358–1366 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalapathy, U., N.S. Hettiarachchy, D. Myers, and M.A. Hanna, Modification of Soy Proteins and Their Adhesive Properties on Woods, Ibid.:507–510 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayakawa, S., and S. Nakai, Relationships of Hydrophobicity and Net Charge to the Solubility of Milk and Soy Proteins, J. Food Sci. 50:436–491 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franzen, K.L., and J.E. Kinsella, Functional Properties of Succinylated and Acetylated Soy Protein, J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:788–795 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gornall, A.G., J. Bardawill, and M.M. David, Determination of Serum Proteins by Means of the Biuret Reaction, J. Biol. Chem. 177:751–766 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinn, J.R., and D. Paton, A Practical Measurement of Water Hydration Capacity of Protein Materials, Cereal Chemistry 56:38–39 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beveridge, T., S.J. Toma, and S. Nakai, Determination of SH and SS Groups in Some Food Proteins Using Elman’s Reagent, J. Food Sci. 39:49–51 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. General Linear Models Procedure, The SAS System (1992), SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

  16. Kato, A., and S. Nakai, Hydrophobicity Determined by a Fluorescence Probe Method and Its Correlation with Surface Properties of Proteins, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 624:13–20 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, L.G., D.M. Whitehead, and J. Kinsella, Modification Reactions and Protein Structure, in Structure-Function Properties of Food Proteins, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, 1994, p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Labuza, T.P., and G.C. Busk, An Analysis of the Water Binding in Gels, J. Food Sci. 44:1379–1385 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arrese, E.L., D.A. Sorgentini, J.R. Wagner, and M.C. Anon, Electrophoretic, Solubility, and Functional Properties of Commercial Soy Protein Isolates, J. Agric. Food Chem. 39:1029–1032 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kalapathy, U., Hettiarachchy, N.S. & Rhee, K.C. Effect of drying methods on molecular properties and functionalities of disulfide bond-cleaved soy proteins. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 74, 195–199 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-997-0123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-997-0123-z

Key words

Navigation