Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ultrasonic and pulsed NMR techniques for determination of solid fat content

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

In this work an ultrasonic velocity technique was compared to direct pulsed NMR (pNMR) spectroscopy for the determination of the solid fat content (SFC) of anhydrous milk fat (AMF), cocoa butter (CB), and blends of AMF and CB with canola oil (CO) in the range 100 to 70% (w/w). In situ measurements of ultrasonic velocity were carried out during cooling (50–5°C) and heating (5–50°C) of the fat samples, and SFC values were calculated. The SFC were also determined simultaneously by pNMR. Peak melting temperatures determined by DSC were used as an indicator of the polymorphic state of the different fats and fat blends. Estimates of SFC obtained using pNMR and ultrasonic velocimetry did not agree. Our results suggested that ultrasonic velocity was highly dependent on the polymorphic state of the solid fat. Ultrasonic velocity in fat that contained crystals in a more stable polymorphic form was consistently higher than in fat that contained crystals in a less stable polymorphic modification. A high attenuation of the signal was observed in milkfat and CB at lower temperatures, particularly after sitting for 24 h. This high attenuation could be a product of scattering by crystallites or by microscopic air pockets formed upon solidification of the material, or it could be due to high ultrasonic absorption associated with phase transitions. This research highlights some of the problems associated with applying ultrasonics to the determination of SFC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gouw, T.H., and J.C. Vlugter, Physical Properties of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters III. Ultrasonic Sound Velocity, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 41:524–526 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gouw, T.H., and J.C. Vlugter, Ultrasonic Sound Velocity in Lipids, Anal. Chim. Acta 34:175–184 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gouw, T.H., and J.C. Vlugter, Physical Properties of Triglycerides III. Ultrasonic Sound Velocity, Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 69:159–164 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, C.R., L.C.S. Reddy, and C.A.R. Prabhu, Study of Adulteration in Oils and Fats by Ultrasonic Methods, Curr. Sci. 49:185–187 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, N.P., and J.S. Singh, Study of the Adulteration of Oils and Fats by Ultrasonic Method, —Ibid. 49:185–187 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Javanaud, C., and R.R. Rahalkha, Velocity of Ultrasound in Vegetable Oils, Fat Sci. Tech. 90:73–75 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. McClements, D.J., and M.J.W. Povey, Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements in Some Liquid Triglycerides and Vegetable Oils, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:1787–1790 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grigor'ev, S.B., Y.S. Manucharov, I.G. Mikhailov, and O. Khakimov, Acoustic Relaxation in Vegetable Oils, Sov. Phys. Acoust. 21:231–234 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gladwell, N., C. Javanaud, K.E. Peters, and R.R. Rahalkar, Ultrasonic Behavior of Edible Oils: Correlation with Rheology, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:1231–1236.

  10. Miles, C.A., G.A.J. Fursey, and R.C.D. Jones, Ultrasonic Estimation of Solid/Liquid Ratios in Fats, Oils, and Adipose Tissue, J. Sci. Food Agric. 36:215–228 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McClements, D.J., The Use of Ultrasonics for Characterizing Fats and Emulsions, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, 1988.

  12. McClements, D.J., and M.J.W. Povey, Investigation of Phase Transitions in Glyceride/Paraffin Oil Mixtures Using Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:1791–1795 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McClements, D.J., and M.J.W. Povey, Comparison of Pulsed NMR and Ultrasonic Velocity Techniques for Determining Solid Fat Contents, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 23:159–170 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McClements, D.J., and M.J.W. Povey, Ultrasonic Analysis of Edible Fats and Oils, Ultrasonics 30:383–388 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McClements, D.J., M.J.W. Povey, and E. Dickinson, Absorption and Velocity Dispersion due to Crytallization and Melting of Emulsion Droplets, —Ibid. 31:433–437 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McClements, D.J., and P. Fairley, Ultrasonic Pulse Echo Reflectometer, —Ibid., 29:58–62 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McClements, D.J., and P. Fairley, Frequency Scanning Ultrasonic Pulse Echo Reflectometer, —Ibid. 30:403–405 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McClements, D.J., Ultrasonic Characterization of Emulsions and Suspensions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 37:33–72 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Javanaud, C., Applications of Ultrasound to Food Systems, Ultrasonics 26:117–123 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McClements, D.J., Ultrasonic NDT of Foods and Drinks, In International Advances in Nondestructive Testing, edited by W.J. McGonnagle, Gordon and Breach Science, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1994, Vol. 17, pp. 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kloek, W., P. Walstra and T. van Vliet, Nucleation Kinetics of Emulsified Triglyceride Mixtures, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 77:643–652 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Marangoni.

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A.P., McClements, D.J. & Marangoni, A.G. Comparison of ultrasonic and pulsed NMR techniques for determination of solid fat content. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 79, 431–437 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-002-0501-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-002-0501-y

Key Words

Navigation