Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and QSPR Studies on the Effect of Ionic Surfactants on n-Decane–Water Interfacial Tension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

A quantitative structure property relationship approach was performed to find the relation between the surfactant structure and its effect on water–oil interfacial tension. As a result, a new database has been developed measuring the interfacial tension between n-decane as the model oil and different aqueous solutions of some ionic compounds. In spite of other reports we selected surfactants by a scientific method that covers all structural information. Twenty four different compounds were selected by the principle component analysis method and their interfacial tensions were measured at their critical micelle concentrations. The geometrical optimization of surfactants was performed at the B3LYP/6-311G** level and quantum chemical and structural descriptors were calculated using relevant computer software programs. The best fitted descriptors were selected using the variable selection of the genetic algorithm (GA-MLR). The predictive test was performed for an external prediction set of 6 compounds, chosen out of 24 compounds. The resulted GA-MLR model can reasonably predict the interfacial tension using only three selected descriptors. The deviation between predicted and measured values was found to be <7%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QSPR:

Quantitative structure property relationship

PCA:

Principal component analysis

GA:

Genetic algorithm

MLR:

Multiple linear regression

CMC:

Critical micelle concentration

PC:

Principle component

SVD:

Singular value decomposition

DFT:

Density functional theory

Jhetv:

Van der Waals’ weighted distance matrix

RDF:

Radial distribution function

ASDA:

Axisymmetric drop shape analysis

ME:

Mean effect

LMO:

Leave many out

References

  1. Butt HJ, Graf KH, Kappl M (2006) Physics and chemistry of interfaces, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schramm LL (2000) Surfactants: fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Esumi K, Ueno M (2003) Structure-performance relationships in surfactants. Surfactant science series, vol 112, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu JW, Zhang XY, Wang ZW (2010) A review on progress in QSPR studies for surfactants. Int J Mol Sci 11:1020–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leardi R (2001) Genetic algorithms in chemometrics and chemistry: a review. J Chemom 15:559–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang ZW, Feng JL, Wang HJ, Cui ZG, Li GZ (2005) Effectiveness of surface tension reduction by nonionic surfactants with quantitative structure-property relationship approach. J Dispers Sci Technol 26:441–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang ZW, Li GZ, Mu JH, Zhang XY, Lou AJ (2002) Quantitative structure-property relationship on prediction of surface tension of nonionic surfactants. Chin Chem Lett 13:363–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kier LB, Hall LH (1999) Molecular structure description: the electrotopological state. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang ZW, Huang DY, Li GZ, Zhang XY, Liao LL (2003) Effectiveness of surface tension reduction by anionic surfactants, a quantitative structure-property relationship. J Dispers Sci Technol 24:653–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brereton RG (2003) Chemometrics: data analysis for the laboratory and chemical plant. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations. Johns Hopkins studies in the mathematical sciences, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  15. HyperChem(TM) Professional Hypercube Inc., 1115 NW 4th Street Gainesville Florida 32601 USA

  16. Todeschini R, Consonni V, Pavana M, Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Group. http://www.disat.unimib.it/chm/

  17. Gaussian 98, Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewski VG, Montgomery Jr. JA, Stratmann RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam NJ, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (1998) Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA

  18. Carpena P, Aguiar J, Bernaola-Galvan P, Ruiz CC (2002) Problems associated with the treatment of conductivity-concentration data in surfactant solutions: simulations and experiments. Langmuir 18:6054–6058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. del Rio OI, Neumann AW (1997) Axisymmetric drop shape analysis: computational methods for the measurement of interfacial properties from the shape and dimensions of pendant and sessile drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 196:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouchot C, Richon D (2001) An enhanced method to calibrate vibrating tube densimeters. Fluid Phase Equilib 191:189–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goebel A, Lunkenheimer K (1997) Interfacial tension of the water/n-alkane interface. Langmuir 13:369–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeppieri S, Rodriguez J, de Ramos ALL (2001) Interfacial tension of alkane plus water systems. J Chem Eng Data 46:1086–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (eds) (2010) NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST standard reference database number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg MD, 20899, http://webbook.nist.gov

  24. Todeschini R, Consonni V (2000) Handbook of molecular descriptors. Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  25. Balaban AT (1982) Highly discriminating distance-based topological index. Chem Phys Lett 89:399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu T, Sjöblom J (1992) Surfactant structure and its relation to the Krafft point, cloud point and micellization: some empirical relationships. Colloids Surf 64:39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siavash Riahi.

About this article

Cite this article

Fallah Fini, M., Riahi, S. & Bahramian, A. Experimental and QSPR Studies on the Effect of Ionic Surfactants on n-Decane–Water Interfacial Tension. J Surfact Deterg 15, 477–484 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-012-1330-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-012-1330-7

Keywords

Navigation