Skip to main content
Log in

Foamability of Detergent Solutions Prepared with Different Types of Surfactants and Waters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

In the development of new detergent products, it is important to test the foaming behavior of different types of surfactants. Different types and concentrations of surfactant solutions prepared with three types of water are expected to present differences in their foamability. In this study, foam volumes produced by cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB; C19H42BrN), Tween 80® (T80; C64H124O26) and sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS; C12H25NaO4S) aqueous solutions (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%, w/v) were compared using a stirring system, rotating at 8,000, 9,500 and 13,500 rpm. The foamability produced by CTAB, SDS and T80 solutions, in a concentration range between 0.2 and 1.0% (w/v), prepared using deionized, hard and hypersaline water were also compared. Foam volumes were higher at a stirring speed of 9,500 rpm than at 8,000 rpm. However, the results obtained at 9,500 and 13,500 rpm were not significantly different. In general, SDS solutions produced higher foam volumes than CTAB and T80 solutions. Water characteristics did not seem to influence significantly the foamability of the three types of surfactants in the studied concentrations. These studies related with foaming behavior appear to be an important step in the pre-formulation of detergent products, particularly in cosmetics and pharmaceutics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saint-Jalmes A, Durian DJ, Weitz DA (2005) Foam. In: Kirk-Othmer RE (eds) Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology, vol 12, pp 1–28

  2. Physics and Astronomy Department, University of California, Los Angeles Foam. http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~dws/foam.html. Accessed Nov 2004

  3. Bikerman JJ (1973) Foams. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson AJ (1996) Experimental techniques for the characterization of foams. In: Prud’Homme RK, Khan SA (eds) Foams: theory, measurements, and applications, surfactant science series, vol 57. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 243–274

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang D, Nikolov A, Wasan D (1986) Foams: basic properties with applications to porous media. Langmuir 2:672–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross S (1947) Foaming volume and foam stability. NACA-tn-1153, University of Stanford

  7. Pandey S, Bagwe RP, Shah DO (2003) Effect of counterions on surface and foaming properties of dodecyl sulfate. J Colloid Interface Sci 267:160–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shrestha LK, Acharya DP, Sharma SC, Aramaki K, Asaoka H, Ihara K, Tsunehiro T, Kunieda H (2006) Aqueous foam stabilized by dispersed surfactant solid and lamellar liquid crystalline phase. J Colloid Interface Sci 301:274–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joseph DD (1997) Understanding foams and foamability. J Fluids Eng 5:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kibbe AH (2000) Handbook of pharmaceutical, excipients. American Pharmaceutical Association and the Washington DC and Pharmaceutical Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Helena Amaral.

About this article

Cite this article

Amaral, M.H., das Neves, J., Oliveira, Â.Z. et al. Foamability of Detergent Solutions Prepared with Different Types of Surfactants and Waters. J Surfact Deterg 11, 275–278 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-008-1088-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-008-1088-0

Keywords

Navigation