Abstract
Increasing demands on the flexibility of assembly workers has led to numerous times of high exposure rates within one workday. Inflexible processing times in synchronized assembly lines mismatch the individual, circadian variable work capacities of operators. As a result, frequent performance peaks due to limited possibilities for individualization elevate physiological and psychological workloads. This paper’s main objective is an individualization of assembly system performance requirements aimed at providing the opportunity to adapt current processing times to individual work capacities for reactively levelling the operators’ workload. On the one hand, the authors focus on defining requirements to enable a company to record valid current processing times within a synchronized assembly line. The authors provide a checklist aimed at generating sets of raw data specifying the necessary requirements. This checklist can be applied by the user of the approach. The authors provide an approach of statistical data processing to eliminate non-valid data-sets which do not allow inference on human performance fluctuations. On the other hand, the paper provides an approach for planning synchronized assembly lines taking into consideration human performance fluctuations. Based on defining performance and time characteristics, the authors methodically deduce one exemplary recommendation for the examined synchronized assembly lines quantifying the expected value for production periods. As a result, this combination leads to the possibility of methodically adapting systems’ performance requirements to fluctuating operators’ work capacity. Moreover, application of the presented approaches within a field study leads to an analysis and evaluation of significant production periods in a German car manufacturer’s engine assembly.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SAL:
-
Synchronized assembly line
- PPC:
-
Production planning and control
- WS:
-
Work station
- PPT:
-
Planned processing times
- CPT:
-
Current processing times
- CPL:
-
Current performance level
- Var:
-
Variant/model-type
- EV:
-
Expected value
References
Westkämper E, Bullinger HJ, Horváth P, Zahn E (eds) (2001) Montageplanung–effizient und marktgerecht. Springer, Heidelberg
Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2007) A classification of assembly line balancing problems. Eur J Op Res 183(2007):674–693
Mazzola E, Perrone G, La Diega SN (2008) Shaping inter-firm collaboration in new product development in the automobile industry: a trade-off between a transaction and relational-based approach. Ann CIRP 57(2008):485–488
Hu SJ, Zhu X, Wang H, Koren Y (2008) Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains. Ann CIRP 57(2008):45–48
ElMaraghy WH, Urbanic RJ (2003) Modelling of manufacturing systems complexity. Ann CIRP 52(1):363–366
Zaeh MF, Moeller N, Sudhoff W (2005) A framework for the valuation of changeable manufacturing systems. 3rd International conference on reconfigurable manufacturing
Reinhart G, Schellmann H (2012) A method to determine customer-specific volume flexibility in a supply network. Prod Eng Res Dev 6:69–78
Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DHR, Paterson A, Sharp JA (2000) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122:41–57
Baines TS, Kay JM (2002) Human performance modelling as an aid in the process of manufacturing system design: a pilot study. Int J Prod Res 40(10):2321–2334
Denkena B, Lorenzen LE, Schmidt J (2012) Adaptive process planning. Prod Eng Res Dev 6:55–67
Becker C, Scholl A (2006) A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. Eur J Oper Res 168:694–715
Feldmann K, Müller B, Haselmann T (1999) Automated assembly of lightweight automotive components. Ann CIRP 48(1):9–12
Din ENISO (2004) 6385 Grundsätze der Ergonomie für die Gestaltung von Arbeits-systemen. Beuth, Berlin
Lotter B, Schilling W (1994) Manuelle Montage: Planung–Rationalisierung–Wirtschaftlichkeit. VDI, Düsseldorf
Bullinger HJ, Spath D, Warnecke HJ, Westkämper E (2009) Handbuch Unternehmensorganisation. Strategien, Planung, 3. Auflage. Umsetzung. Springer, Heidelberg
Colledani M, Matta A, Tolio T (2010) Analysis of the production variability in multi-stage manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 59:449–452
Reinhart G, Glonegger M, Festner M, Egbers J, Schilp J (2012) Adaption of processing times to individual work capacities in synchronized assembly lines. In: Hu SJ (ed) Technologies and systems for assembly quality, productivity and customization. Proceedings of the 4th CIRP conference on assembly technologies and systems, pp 161–164
Kallio K, Johnsson M, Nevalainien OS (2012) Estimating the operation time of flexible surface mount placement machines. Prod Eng Res Dev 6:319–328
Scholz-Reiter B, Freitag M (2007) Autonomous processes in assembly systems. Ann CIRP 56(2):712–729
Carnahan BJ, Norman BA, Redfern MS (2001) Incorporation physical demand criteria into assembly line balancing. IEE Trans 33(2001):875–887
Boysen N (2005) Variantenfließfertigung. Dissertation, Universität Hamburg
Schlick C, Luczak H, Bruder R (2009) Arbeitswissenschaft, 3, vollständig über-arbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Springer, Heidelberg
Bjerner B, Holm A, Swennson A (1955) Diurnal variation in mental performance—a study of three-shift workers. Br J Ind Med 12(103):103–110
Graf O (1960) Arbeitsphysiologie. In: Gutenberg E (ed) Die Wirtschaftswis-senschaften. Gabler, Wiesbaden
Kratzsch S (2000) Prozess- und Arbeitsorganisation in Fließmontagesystemen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig
Fletcher SR, Baines TS, Harrison DK (2008) An investigation of production workers’ performance variations and the potential impact of attitudes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:1113–1123
Dennis P (2007) Lean production simplified: a plain-language guide to the world’s most powerful production system, 2nd edn. Productivity Press, New York
Heymann HH, Seiwert LJ (1982) Job Sharing–Flexible Arbeitszeit durch Arbeitsplatzeinteilung. Expert, Grafenau
REFA Verband für Arbeitsstudien e. V. (ed) (1984) Methodenlehre des Arbeitsstudiums–Teil 1: Grundlagen, 7. Auflage. Hanser, München
Blohm H, Beer T, Seidenberg U, Silber H (1997) Produktionswirtschaft, 3, völlig, neubearbeitete edn. Herne, Berlin
Drumm HJ (2008) Personalwirtschaft, 6th edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Zaeh MF, Prasch M (2007) Systematic workplace and assembly redesign for ageing workforces. Prod Eng Res Dev 1:57–64
Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million-dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. Rawson Associates, New York
Jungbluth A, Mommsen E (eds) (1968) Angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft: Ein Lehrbuch für Ingenieure. Verlag Mensch und Arbeit, München
Rohmert W, Rutenfranz J (eds) (1983) Praktische Arbeitsphysiologie, 3 neubearbeitete Auflage. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart
Glonegger M, Ottmann W, Schadl M, Distel D (2013) Identification of production rhythms in synchronized assembly lines by recording and evaluating current processing times. Adv Mat Res 769(2013):350–358
Schwab G (1991) Fehlende Werte in der angewandten Statistik. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden
Dickie HF (1951) ABC Inventory Analysis Shoots for Dollars, not Pennies. Fact Manag Maint 109(6):92–94
Eckstein PP (2012) Statistik für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler–Eine realdatenbasierte Einführung mit SPS, 3, überarbeitete und, erweiterte edn. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Colquhoun WP (1971) Biological Rhythms and Human Performance. Academic Press, London
Glonegger M (2014) Berücksichtigung menschlicher Leistungsschwankungen bei der Planung von Variantenfließmontagesystemen. UTZ, München
Acknowledgments
The project “BioTakt–Adaption of Production Planning and Control to Human Circadian Rhythms” is funded by the Bavarian research trust. Furthermore, support from our industrial partners serves as the foundation for research activities in this field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glonegger, M., Reinhart, G. Planning of synchronized assembly lines taking into consideration human performance fluctuations. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 9, 277–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0595-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0595-2