Abstract
Treatment of OSA with CPAP is currently the recommended treatment and has the greatest evidence of efficacy on AHI, symptoms and comorbidities. Symptomatic patients with moderate-severe OSA generally have good adherence to CPAP therapy, while those with mild OSA, female, young and generally paucisymptomatic, have lower CPAP adherence, especially in the medium and long term. The recent identification of different clinical and pathophysiological phenotypes of OSA has paved the way for alternative treatments to CPAP, leading to an increasingly personalized therapy. Weight loss and lifestyle modifications are highly recommended in all obese or overweight patients. Mandibular advancement devices (MAD), positional therapy (PT) and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HSN) are recent and personalized alternative therapies on which there is promising and encouraging data but with still little strong scientific evidence. The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy, adherence and costs of various therapeutic options for OSA patients in the light of recent evidence and to provide useful guidance for specialists.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disease characterized by the occurrence of partial or complete upper airway collapse during sleep [1]. Obstructive respiratory events acutely result in cyclic intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation. If left untreated, OSA negatively impacts daytime function and increases the risk of motor vehicle accidents. The most common symptoms are intermittent snoring, disturbed sleep, daytime sleepiness, and fatigue. OSA contributes to systemic hypertension through sympathetic hyperactivation and may be associated with cognitive impairment [1]. OSA patients are often obese, show multiple cardiometabolic comorbidities, and a profile of high cardiovascular risk [1, 2]. The most common treatment of OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applied every night during sleep through a nasal mask to splint the upper airway open [3]. However, over time, the interest in alternative treatments has increased, especially because acceptance of CPAP by the patients is often low. Recent research has clarified that many clinical and pathophysiological phenotypes of OSA exist, opening the way to personalized treatment of the disease [4]. Among clinical phenotypes, the simplest classification includes three clusters of OSA presentation: patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), patients with disturbed sleep, and minimally symptomatic patients [5]. As for pathophysiological phenotypes, besides anatomic impairment of the upper airway, additional functional traits have been identified, leading to a rational therapeutic approach, including non-CPAP treatment(s) [4]. While a personalized therapeutic approach is a major goal of current research, additional aspects of OSA treatment should be taken into consideration. Each physician ultimately suggests a treatment based not only on the evidence of its effectiveness but also on the disease phenotype, the availability, the cost and the acceptance by the patient. OSA treatment is no exception, and this review will try to provide the reader with a concise overview of the most common treatment options and their clinical indications in adult OSA patients. Because of space limitations, upper airway surgery will not be considered since a recent American Academy of Sleep Medicine guideline did not recommend upper airway surgery as a first-line treatment for severe OSA, although the surgical option(s) should be discussed with the patient [6, 7].
CPAP
CPAP is the mainstay of OSA treatment, especially in patients with moderate-severe disease based on the frequency of respiratory events during sleep, i.e., the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI). CPAP is indicated for AHI > 15/h independent of symptoms, or for lower AHI associated with EDS [8]. Its effectiveness is evidence-based, since CPAP treatment in adults with OSA significantly decreases disease severity, sleepiness, blood pressure, and the risk for motor vehicle accidents, and improves sleep-related quality of life [9]. The therapeutic pressure has to be established for each patient based on the results of manual titration, or more often home titration with an automatic CPAP device over a few nights. The mask should fit well without leaks, and nasal masks should be preferred to oronasal masks [10].
There is a current debate on the use of automatic CPAP versus fixed pressure CPAP devices. Air leaks were unaffected by the type of CPAP [11], but in some studies fixed CPAP was superior to automatic CPAP in cardiovascular risk reduction [12] and preservation of renal function [13] during follow-up. A randomized trial is ongoing and will assess sympathetic nerve activation in response to both treatment types [14].
Compliance with CPAP is a well-known problem, especially over the medium- and long-term. The minimum Medicare criteria for CPAP reimbursement is nightly use of at least 4 h for 70% of the nights, but ideally patients should use CPAP for the entire sleep period. CPAP effectiveness in decreasing sleepiness shows a dose–response relationship [15]. Availability of long-term compliance data, found also on digital platforms by CPAP manufacturers, identified different patterns of CPAP use, with about 50% of patients being good users [16]. Good adherence to CPAP is usually found in OSA patients with EDS and significant limitations of daytime function, whereas patients referring insomnia [17] or females, mildly symptomatic patients, and patients with comorbidities showed a low likelihood of CPAP treatment success [18]. A health/safety risk behavior has also been associated with CPAP discontinuation [19], highlighting the complexity of factors in different domains which play a role in CPAP acceptance by the patients.
Some patients with indication for CPAP treatment and poor tolerance to CPAP may gain benefit from shifting to bilevel ventilation during sleep, as recently found in a large cohort of “real-life” patients followed by using a telemedicine platform [20]. Similarly, the use of automatic bilevel ventilation may improve the clinical outcome in patients with poor tolerance to CPAP or overlap OSA-COPD syndrome [21]. Telemedicine is useful and cost-effective for the management of OSA patients on CPAP [22] and its use has greatly increased during the pandemic, likely setting a new standard of care for the future [23].
Lifestyle changes and weight loss
OSA is highly prevalent in overweight or obese subjects, and obesity is a major risk factor for OSA [1]. Accordingly, weight loss is associated with a decrease in AHI and OSA severity [24]. A longitudinal study in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort reported that weight gain by 10% predicted a 32% increase in AHI; conversely, a 10% weight loss was associated with a 26% decrease in AHI [25]. Therefore, weight loss should always be advised for overweight/obese patients with OSA, although it rarely causes the complete disappearance of OSA [26]. In addition, weight loss may also be effective for patients with mild OSA. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of CPAP, weight loss, and weight loss + CPAP on insulin resistance, blood pressure, and C-reactive protein concentration as markers of inflammation reported larger beneficial changes when CPAP was associated with a hypocaloric diet [27]. The American Thoracic Society guideline recommended that OSA patients should participate in a comprehensive lifestyle intervention program, including exercise [27]. For severely obese OSA patients who do not succeed to lose weight, referral for bariatric surgery evaluation is suggested in the absence of contraindications [6, 27]. Studies on medications such as liraglutide and gliflozins have been conducted in diabetic OSA patients and may positively modify the cardiometabolic risk profile besides their effect on weight loss [28, 29].
Positional therapy
Some OSA patients show more frequent and severe respiratory events when lying supine, while very few events occur while sleeping in other positions. Positional OSA (POSA) is defined as a ratio of respiratory events in the supine to non-supine position greater than 2:1, and some patients show OSA exclusively when supine (e-POSA). In a large retrospective study, the prevalence of POSA was over 50%, and of e-POSA was 20% [30]. These patients often show suboptimal compliance to CPAP treatment [30] and may be treated with devices preventing the supine position during sleep by causing vibrations in the neck or in the chest. Meta-analyses confirmed their effectiveness in preventing the supine position and reducing the AHI, although the effect was lower than CPAP [31, 32]. Short-term compliance was satisfactory, while regular use at 6 months was reported in 41.6% of the patients, with a larger therapeutic effect in patients with mild-moderate OSA than in patients with severe OSA [33].
Mandibular advancement device (MAD)
The principle of MAD is that advancement of the mandible enlarges and stabilizes the upper airway, decreasing snoring and the occurrence of obstructive respiratory events [34, 35]. Custom-made, dual-block MAD represents an established, effective and attractive option in primary snoring, and in patients with OSA not accepting CPAP treatment [36]. Custom, titratable devices should be preferred to non-custom ones, and patients should undergo regular follow-up by both the sleep physician and the dentist [36].
According to several meta-analyses, CPAP is more effective compared to MAD in decreasing AHI and ODI [37] or daytime sleepiness [38]. However, because compliance to treatment is higher for MAD than for CPAP, MAD is considered a good alternative to CPAP treatment. Some phenotypic features of OSA have been identified as predictors of a positive response to MAD: young age, female gender, absence of severe obesity, a small neck circumference, and an AHI in the mild-moderate range; from the anatomic point of view, retraction of maxilla and mandible, a narrow airway and a short soft palate also predicted success [39]. A recent study using drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) showed that tongue base collapse represents the only phenotype predicting a good response to MAD [40]. According to another study, mild to moderate upper airway collapsibility and favorable functional traits may predict a good response to MAD [41]. A high degree of upper airway collapsibility, estimated as a CPAP therapeutic pressure > 10.5 cmH2O, was also found to predict poor response to MAD [42]. More recently, a high ventilatory instability during sleep, i.e. a high loop gain, was reported in patients who are poorly responsive to MAD [43].
Some studies have tested the efficacy of MAD in severe OSA, which is not traditionally considered as a good indication of MAD. An observational study on patients with severe OSA refusing CPAP treatment reported positive results with MAD [44], similarly a multicenter Korean study reported a decrease in AHI by 64 ± 26% after one month of treatment, but the positive effects were especially seen in patients with low BMI [45]. Finally, an individual patient meta-analysis compared the outcomes of CPAP and MAD in patients with severe OSA from 4 randomized controlled trials and found that titratable MAD was less effective than CPAP on AHI, but results were similar for improvement in quality of life, sleepiness, and sleep macrostructure [46].
Side effects of MAD are usually minor and self-limiting at the start of treatment but can involve bite changes in long-term treatment [35, 47]. Additionally, OSA may worsen over time despite MAD use, suggesting that it may be beneficial to perform periodic control visits, especially after long-term use.
Little evidence is available as the effects of MAD on markers of cardiovascular risk are concerned. Randomized controlled trials reported no effect of MAD treatment on blood pressure, endothelial cell function, or inflammatory markers [48–51]. However, some studies documented positive cardiovascular effects after MAD treatment, such as reversal of left ventricular remodeling [52], and changes in heart rate variability [53].
Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HSN)
HSN was introduced in 2014 for the treatment of OSA. The hypoglossal nerve contains only motor fibers innervating several muscles including the genioglossus (GG), the main pharyngeal dilator muscle. There are monolateral devices approved for clinical use, and one device producing bilateral stimulation of the GG; the reader is referred to an extensive review for technical details [54]. HSN is indicated in adult patients intolerant of CPAP, with moderate-severe OSA, i.e. AHI ≥ 15/h and < 65/h, no more than 25% of central or mixed events, BMI < 35 kg/m2, and absence of complete concentric palatal collapse at DISE [55, 56]. Implantation of the device requires surgical intervention by an ENT specialist. Results have been promising and stable over time, and patients’ adherence and satisfaction are high [57]. However, efforts are being made to identify predictors of a positive response, and HSN is far from being completely clarified as pathophysiological effects and outcomes are concerned [58]. A recent study identified the physiological traits predictive of a good response to treatment: a low arousal threshold and loop gain, and occurrence of muscle compensation [59]. The HSN treatment has revived interest in transcutaneous electrical stimulation, which would have the advantage of eliminating surgery, but is less effective than HSN [60, 61].
How to choose the right treatment for each patient?
Choosing the right treatment for each patient is a major challenge because clusters based on clinical characteristics or endotypic traits are known to exist, and physicians should suggest the best therapeutic option and personalize treatment [62]. Besides the treatments for OSA considered in this review, there are additional therapeutic options currently under study, including drugs and myofunctional therapy [62]. In addition, the possibility to combine treatment options to improve clinical and pathophysiological outcomes is very attractive but requires careful studies that put together what is known on the response to treatment of clinical phenotypes and endotypes of OSA, possibly using artificial intelligence approaches [62]. Indeed, the recently published ERS updated guideline on non-PAP therapies reported low or very low certainty of the evidence for all treatments examined [63]. Finally, although DISE is a precious tool to study upper airway functional abnormalities [64, 65], its clinical use is limited to some, not all, sleep Centers.
Table 1 summarizes the different factors to take into consideration when discussing OSA treatments alternative to CPAP with the patient. The cost of treatments is variable since Health systems apply different reimbursement rules in Europe, and this is an additional factor to consider, potentially generating health inequities [63]. It is likely that clinical research will proceed quickly towards the development of new and carefully tested clinical algorithms to help the physician and the patient to make the best choice. Patient preference is also a major variable to consider.
Conclusions
In patients with mild OSA and in patients with predominant functional as opposed to anatomical impairment, alternative OSA treatment should be considered, especially because acceptance of CPAP in these patients is usually low. In patients with moderate-severe OSA refusing CPAP treatment, alternative treatments ought to be taken into consideration according to the clinical and physiological phenotypes and patient preferences. Ongoing work will further clarify how to personalize OSA treatment, but currently, the evidence for non-PAP therapies is insufficient to draw conclusions. On the other hand, the number of patients requesting non-CPAP treatment is high, and patient preferences can affect the choice. Results of treatment should be objectively documented, and follow-up should be regular for all types of treatment, CPAP or non-CPAP, to adjust treatment if needed.
References
Lévy P, Kohler M, McNicholas WT, Barbé F, McEvoy RD, Somers VK, Lavie L, Pépin JL (2015) Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.15
Bonsignore MR, Baiamonte P, Mazzuca E, Castrogiovanni A, Marrone O (2019) Obstructive sleep apnea and comorbidities: a dangerous liaison. Multidiscip Respir Med 14:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0172-9
Sullivan CE (2018) Nasal positive airway pressure and sleep apnea. Reflections on an experimental method that became a therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198(5):581–587. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201709-1921PP
Eckert DJ (2018) Phenotypic approaches to obstructive sleep apnoea—new pathways for targeted therapy. Sleep Med Rev 37:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2016.12.003
Ye L, Pien GW, Ratcliffe SJ, Björnsdottir E, Arnardottir ES, Pack AI, Benediktsdottir B, Gislason T (2014) The different clinical faces of obstructive sleep apnoea: a cluster analysis. Eur Respir J 44(6):1600–1607. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00032314
Kent D, Stanley J, Aurora RN, Levine C, Gottlieb DJ, Spann MD, Torre CA, Green K, Harrod CG (2021) Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9592
Kent D, Stanley J, Aurora RN, Levine CG, Gottlieb DJ, Spann MD, Torre CA, Green K, Harrod CG (2021) Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med 17(12):2507–2531. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9594
Patil SP, Ayappa IA, Caples SM, Kimoff RJ, Patel SR, Harrod CG (2019) Treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea with positive airway pressure: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med 15(2):335–343. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7640
Patil SP, Ayappa IA, Caples SM, Kimoff RJ, Patel SR, Harrod CG (2019) Treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea with positive airway pressure: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med 15(2):301–334. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7638
Andrade RGS, Viana FM, Nascimento JA, Drager LF, Moffa A, Brunoni AR, Genta PR, Lorenzi-Filho G (2018) Nasal vs oronasal CPAP for OSA treatment: a meta-analysis. Chest 153(3):665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.044
Lebret M, Rotty MC, Argento C, Pepin JL, Tamisier R, Arbib F, Jaffuel D, Molinari N, Borel JC (2019) Comparison of auto- and fixed-continuous positive airway pressure on air leak in patients with pbstructive sleep apnea: data from a randomized controlled trial. Can Respir J 2019:6310956. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6310956
Patruno V, Aiolfi S, Costantino G, Murgia R, Selmi C, Malliani A, Montano N (2007) Fixed and autoadjusting continuous positive airway pressure treatments are not similar in reducing cardiovascular risk factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 131(5):1393–1399. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2192
Marrone O, Cibella F, Pépin JL, Grote L, Verbraecken J, Saaresranta T, Kvamme JA, Basoglu OK, Lombardi C, McNicholas WT, Hedner J, Bonsignore MR, Network ESADA (2018) Fixed but not autoadjusting positive airway pressure attenuates the time-dependent decline in glomerular filtration rate in patients with OSA. Chest 154(2):326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.020
Treptow E, Pepin JL, Bailly S, Levy P, Bosc C, Destors M, Woehrle H, Tamisier R (2019) Reduction in sympathetic tone in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: is fixed CPAP more effective than APAP? A randomised, parallel trial protocol. BMJ Open 9(4):e024253. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024253
Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Bloxham T, George CF, Greenberg H, Kader G, Mahowald M, Younger J, Pack AI (2007) Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning. Sleep 30(6):711–7299. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/30.6.711
Babbin SF, Velicer WF, Aloia MS, Kushida CA (2015) Identifying longitudinal patterns for individuals and subgroups: an example with adherence to treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Multivariate Behav Res 50(1):91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.958211
Eysteinsdottir B, Gislason T, Pack AI, Benediktsdottir B, Arnardottir ES, Kuna ST, Björnsdottir E (2017) Insomnia complaints in lean patients with obstructive sleep apnea negatively affect positive airway pressure treatment adherence. J Sleep Res 26(2):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12482
Gagnadoux F, Le Vaillant M, Paris A, Pigeanne T, Leclair-Visonneau L, Bizieux-Thaminy A, Alizon C, Humeau MP, Nguyen XL, Rouault B, Trzepizur W, Meslier N (2016) Relationship between OSA clinical phenotypes and CPAP treatment outcomes. Chest 149(1):288–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2015.09.032
Pelletier-Fleury N, Le Vaillant M, Goupil F, Paris A, Pigeane T, Gagnadoux F, Meslier N, IRSR Sleep Cohort Group (2021) Risk-seeking attitude in health and safety domain is associated with continuous positive airway pressure discontinuation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea—a multicenter prospective cohort study. Sleep 44(2):zsaa156. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa156
Benjafield AV, Pépin JL, Valentine K, Cistulli PA, Woehrle H, Nunez CM, Armitstead J, Malhotra A (2019) Compliance after switching from CPAP to bilevel for patients with non-compliant OSA: big data analysis. BMJ Open Respir Res 6(1):e000380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000380
Baiamonte P, Mazzuca E, Gruttad’Auria CI, Castrogiovanni A, Marino C, Lo Nardo D, Basile M, Algeri M, Battaglia S, Marrone O, Gagliardo A, Bonsignore MR (2018) Use of autobilevel ventilation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an observational study. J Sleep Res 27(6):e12680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12680
Isetta V, Negrín MA, Monasterio C, Masa JF, Feu N, Álvarez A, Campos-Rodriguez F, Ruiz C, Abad J, Vázquez-Polo FJ, Farré R, Galdeano M, Lloberes P, Embid C, de la Peña M, Puertas J, Dalmases M, Salord N, Corral J, Jurado B, León C, Egea C, Muñoz A, Parra O, Cambrodi R, Martel-Escobar M, Arqué M, Montserrat JM, Network SS (2015) A Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis of a telemedicine-based strategy for the management of sleep apnoea: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Thorax 70(11):1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207032
Schiza S, Simonds A, Randerath W, Fanfulla F, Testelmans D, Grote L, Montserrat JM, Pepin JL, Verbraecken J, Ersu R, Bonsignore MR (2021) Sleep laboratories reopening and COVID-19: a European perspective. Eur Respir J 57(3):2002722. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02722-2020
Araghi MH, Chen YF, Jagielski A, Choudhury S, Banerjee D, Hussain S, Thomas GN, Taheri S (2013) Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep 36(10):1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3056 (1562A–1562E)
Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J (2000) Longitudinal study of moderate weight change and sleep-disordered breathing. JAMA 284(23):3015–3021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3015
Hudgel DW, Patel SR, Ahasic AM, Bartlett SJ, Bessesen DH, Coaker MA, Fiander PM, Grunstein RR, Gurubhagavatula I, Kapur VK, Lettieri CJ, Naughton MT, Owens RL, Pepin JL, Tuomilehto H, Wilson KC, American Thoracic Society Assembly on Sleep and Respiratory Neurobiology (2018) The role of weight management in the treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 198(6):e70–e87. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201807-1326ST
Chirinos JA, Gurubhagavatula I, Teff K, Rader DJ, Wadden TA, Townsend R, Foster GD, Maislin G, Saif H, Broderick P, Chittams J, Hanlon AL, Pack AI (2014) CPAP, weight loss, or both for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 370(24):2265–2275. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306187
Neeland IJ, Eliasson B, Kasai T, Marx N, Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Wanner C, Zwiener I, Wojeck BS, Yaggi HK, Johansen OE, EMPA-REGOUTCOME Investigators (2020) The impact of empagliflozin on obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular and renal outcomes: an Exploratory analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care 43(12):3007–3015. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1096
Sprung VS, Kemp GJ, Wilding JP, Adams V, Murphy K, Burgess M, Emegbo S, Thomas M, Needham AJ, Weimken A, Schwab RJ, Manuel A, Craig SE, Cuthbertson DJ (2020) Randomised, cOntrolled Multicentre trial of 26 weeks subcutaneous liraglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor Agonist), with or without contiNuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obstructive sleep apnoEa (OSA) (ROMANCE): study protocol assessing the effects of weight loss on the apnea–hypnoea index (AHI). BMJ Open 10(7):e038856. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038856
Sabil A, Blanchard M, Trzepizur W, Goupil F, Meslier N, Paris A, Pigeanne T, Priou P, Le Vaillant M, Gagnadoux F, Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort Group (2020) Positional obstructive sleep apnea within a large multicenter French cohort: prevalence, characteristics, and treatment outcomes. J Clin Sleep Med 16(12):2037–2046. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8752
Ravesloot MJL, White D, Heinzer R, Oksenberg A, Pépin JL (2017) Efficacy of the new generation of devices for positional therapy for patients with positional obstructive sleep spnea: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 13(6):813–824. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6622
Srijithesh PR, Aghoram R, Goel A, Dhanya J (2019) Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(5):CD010990. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010990.pub2
De Corso E, Mastrapasqua RF, Fiorita A, Settimi S, Mele DA, Picciotti PM, Loperfido A, Marrone S, Rizzotto G, Paludetti G, Scarano E (2020) Efficacy and long-term follow-up of positional therapy by vibrotactile neck-based device in the management of positional OSA. J Clin Sleep Med 16(10):1711–1719. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8664
Marklund M (2017) Update on oral appliance therapy for OSA. Curr Sleep Med Rep 3(3):143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-017-0080-5
Marklund M, Braem MJA, Verbraecken J (2019) Update on oral appliance therapy. Eur Respir Rev 28(153):190083. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0083-2019
Ramar K, Dort LC, Katz SG, Lettieri CJ, Harrod CG, Thomas SM, Chervin RD (2015) Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliance therapy: an update for 2015. J Clin Sleep Med 11(7):773–827. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.4858
Sharples LD, Clutterbuck-James AL, Glover MJ, Bennett MS, Chadwick R, Pittman MA, Quinnell TG (2016) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of oral mandibular advancement devices and continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea. Sleep Med Rev 27:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.05.003
Bratton DJ, Gaisl T, Schlatzer C, Kohler M (2015) Comparison of the effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 3(11):869–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00416-6
Chen H, Eckert DJ, van der Stelt PF, Guo J, Ge S, Emami E, Almeida FR, Huynh NT (2020) Phenotypes of responders to mandibular advancement device therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 49:101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101229
Op de Beeck S, Dieltjens M, Verbruggen AE, Vroegop AV, Wouters K, Hamans E, Willemen M, Verbraecken J, BackerWA De, Van de Heyning PH, Braem MJ, Vanderveken OM (2019) Phenotypic labelling using drug-induced sleep endoscopy improves patient selection for mandibular advancement device outcome: a prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med. 15(8):1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7796
Bamagoos AA, Cistulli PA, Sutherland K, Madronio M, Eckert DJ, Hess L, Edwards BA, Wellman A, Sands SA (2019) Polysomnographic endotyping to select patients with obstructive sleep apnea for oral appliances. Ann Am Thorac Soc 16(11):1422–1431. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-190OC
Tsuiki S, Ito E, Isono S, Ryan CF, Komada Y, Matsuura M, Inoue Y (2013) Oropharyngeal crowding and obesity as predictors of oral appliance treatment response to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 144(2):558–563. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2609
Op de Beeck S, Dieltjens M, Azarbarzin A, Willemen M, Verbraecken J, Braem MJ, Wellman A, Sands SA, Vanderveken OM (2021) Mandibular advancement device treatment efficacy is associated with polysomnographic endotypes. Ann Am Thorac Soc 18(3):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-220OC
de Lourdes RGM, Hermont AP, de Azevedo PG, Bastos PL, de Oliveira MTP, de Melo IM, Ottoboni GS, Vedolin G, Caram JM (2018) Severe obstructive sleep apnea treatment with oral appliance: the impact on obstructive, central and mixed events. Sleep Breath. 22(1):91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1535-0
Byun JI, Kim D, Ahn SJ, Yang KI, Cho YW, Cistulli PA, Shin WC (2020) Efficacy of oral appliance therapy as a first-line treatment for moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea: a Korean prospective multicenter observational study. J Clin Neurol 16(2):215–221. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2020.16.2.215
Trzepizur W, Cistulli PA, Glos M, Vielle B, Sutherland K, Wijkstra PJ, Hoekema A, Gagnadoux F (2021) Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus mandibular advancement device for the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Sleep 44(7):zsab015. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsab015
Araie T, Okuno K, Ono Minagi H, Sakai T (2018) Dental and skeletal changes associated with long-term oral appliance use for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 41:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2018.02.006
Gagnadoux F, Pépin JL, Vielle B, Bironneau V, Chouet-Girard F, Launois S, Meslier N, Meurice JC, Nguyen XL, Paris A, Priou P, Tamisier R, Trzepizur W, Goupil F, Fleury B (2017) Impact of mandibular advancement therapy on endothelial function in severe obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195(9):1244–1252. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201609-1817OC
Yamamoto U, Nishizaka M, Tsuda H, Tsutsui H, Ando SI (2019) Crossover comparison between CPAP and mandibular advancement device with adherence monitor about the effects on endothelial function, blood pressure and symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Heart Vessels 34(10):1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01392-3
Recoquillon S, Pépin JL, Vielle B, Andriantsitohaina R, Bironneau V, Chouet-Girard F, Fleury B, Goupil F, Launois S, Martinez MC, Meslier N, Nguyen XL, Paris A, Priou P, Tamisier R, Trzepizur W, Gagnadoux F (2019) Effect of mandibular advancement therapy on inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 74(5):496–499. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212609
Hedberg P, Nohlert E, Tegelberg Å (2021) Effects of oral appliance treatment on inflammatory biomarkers in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomised controlled trial. J Sleep Res 30(4):e13253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13253
Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM, Shivalkar B, Van Haesendonck G, Kastoer C, Heidbuchel H, Braem MJ, Van De Heyning CM (2021) Mandibular advancement device treatment and reverse left ventricular hypertrophic remodeling in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9766
Kim JW, Kwon SO, Lee WH (2020) Nocturnal heart rate variability may be useful for determining the efficacy of mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnea. Sci Rep 10(1):1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57780-7
Combs D, Estep L, Helmick S, Machamer J, Parthasarathy S (2021) The hypoglossal nerve stimulation as a novel therapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea—a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041642
Hassan F, Kaplish N (2021) Hypoglossal nerve stimulator: a novel treatment approach for OSA—overview of treatment, including diagnostic and patient criteria and procedural terminology codes. Chest 160(4):1406–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.039
Steffen A, Heiser C, Galetke W, Herkenrath SD, Maurer JT, Günther E, Stuck BA, Woehrle H, Löhler J, Randerath W (2022) Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, head and neck surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06902-6
Hofauer B, Steffen A, Knopf A, Hasselbacher K, Heiser C (2019) Patient experience with upper airway stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 23(1):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-018-1689-4
Suurna MV, Jacobowitz O, Chang J, Koutsourelakis I, Smith D, Alkan U, D’Agostino M, Boon M, Heiser C, Hoff P, Huntley C, Kent D, Kominsky A, Lewis R, Maurer JT, Ravesloot MJ, Soose R, Steffen A, Weaver EM, Williams AM, Woodson T, Yaremchuk K, Ishman SL (2021) Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions, and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum. J Clin Sleep Med 17(12):2477–2487. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9542
Op de Beeck S, Wellman A, Dieltjens M, Strohl KP, Willemen M, Van de Heyning PH, Verbraecken JA, Vanderveken OM, Sands SA, STAR Trial Investigators (2021) Endotypic mechanisms of successful hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 203(6):746–755. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202006-2176OC
Machado Júnior AJ, Crespo AN, Pauna HF (2020) Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea: is there a light at the end of the tunnel? Ear Nose Throat J 99(2):87–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319847462
Byun YJ, Yan F, Nguyen SA, Lentsch EJ (2020) Transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 163(4):645–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820917631
Pépin JL, Eastwood P, Eckert DJ (2021) Novel avenues to approach non-CPAP therapy and implement comprehensive OSA care. Eur Respir J 2021:2101788. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01788-2021
Randerath W, Verbraecken J, de Raaff CAL, Hedner J, Herkenrath S, Hohenhorst W, Jakob T, Marrone O, Marklund M, McNicholas WT, Morgan RL, Pepin JL, Schiza S, Skoetz N, Smyth D, Steier J, Tonia T, Trzepizur W, van Mechelen PH, Wijkstra P (2021) European Respiratory Society guideline on non-CPAP therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir Rev 30(162):210200. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0200-2021
Bosi M, Incerti Parenti S, Sanna A, Plazzi G, De Vito A, Alessandri-Bonetti G (2021) Non-continuous positive airway pressure treatment options in obstructive sleep apnoea: a pathophysiological perspective. Sleep Med Rev 60:101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101521
Vroegop AV, Vanderveken OM, Verbraecken JA (2020) (2020) Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: evaluation of a selection tool for treatment modalities for obstructive sleep apnea. Respiration 99(5):451–457. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505584
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare the absence of financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.
Human and animal rights
This is a review article, and did not involve any work on humans or animals.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gambino, F., Zammuto, M.M., Virzì, A. et al. Treatment options in obstructive sleep apnea. Intern Emerg Med 17, 971–978 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02983-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02983-1