Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Short training in focused cardiac ultrasound in an Internal Medicine department: what realistic skill targets could be achieved?

  • HTA-ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) in Internal Medicine care has been recognized by the American Society of Echocardiography. The aim of this study was to test what realistic skill targets could be achieved in FCU, with a relatively short training (theoretical and practical) of 9 h offered to Internal Medicine certification board attending students, and if the addition of further 9 h of training could significantly improve the level of competence. Kappa statistic was used to calculate the inter-observer agreement (trainees/tutor). The agreement between the trainees (who completed the entire training) and the tutor was, respectively, “substantial” (k = 0.71) for the identification of pericardial effusion, “moderate” (k = 0.56–0.54) for the identification of marked right ventricular and left ventricular enlargement, “substantial” (k = 0.77) for the assessment of global cardiac systolic function by visual inspection and “fair” (k = 0.35) for the assessment of size and respiratory change in the diameter of the inferior cave vein (IVC). 18 h training in FCU provided proficiency in obtaining adequate images from the parasternal window without providing the ability to correctly master the apical and subcostal windows. As concerns the interpretative skills, only pericardial effusion and visual estimation of global systolic function could be correctly identified, while ventricular enlargement and IVC prove to be more difficult to evaluate. This study supports incorporating FCU into Internal Medicine fellowship training programs, and should facilitate the design of other similar training courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manasia AR, Nagaraj HM, Kodali RB, Croft LB, Oropello JM, Kohli-Seth R, Leibowitz AB, Del Giudice R, Hufanda J, Benjamin E, Goldman ME (2005) Feasibility and potential clinical utility of goal-directed transthoracic echocardiography performed by non-cardiologist intensivists using a small hand-carried device (sonoheart) in critically ill patients, emergency room physicians. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19:155–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, Goldstein SA, Jones R, Kort S, Porter T, Spencer KT, Tayal VS, Wei K (2010) American society of echocardiography consensus statement focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of echocardiography and American college of emergency physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1225–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaulieu Y (2007) Bedside echocardiography in the assessment of the critically ill. Crit Care Med 35(suppl):S235–S249

  4. Alexander JH, Peterson ED, Chen AY, Harding TM, Adams DB, Kisslo JA Jr (2004) Feasibility of point-of-care echocardiography by internal medicine house staff. Am Heart J 147:476–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Razi R, Estrada JR, Doll J, Spencer KT (2011) Bedside hand-carried ultrasound by Internal Medicine residents versus traditional clinical assessment for the identification of systolic dysfunction in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1319–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spencer KT, Kimura JB, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ (2013) Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:567–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Via G, Hussain A, Wells M, Reardon R, El Barbary M, Noble V, Tsung J, Neskovic A, Price S, Oren-Grinberg A, Liteplo A, Cordioli R, Naqvi N, Rola P, Poelaert J, Golob Guliĉ T, Sloth E, Labovitz A, Kimura B, Breitkreutz R, Masani N, Bowra J, Talmor D, Guarracino F, Goudie A, Xiaoting W, Chawla R, Galderisi M, Blaivas M, Petrovic T, Storti E, Neri L, Melniker L (2014) International Liaison Committee on Focused Cardiac UltraSound (ILC-FoCUS) for the International Conference on Focused Cardiac UltraSound (IC-FoCUS) International Evidence-Based Recommendations for Focused Cardiac Ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:683.e1–e33

  8. Douglas P, Garcia M, Haines D, Lai W, Manning W, Patel A, Picard M, Polk D, Ragosta M, Ward R, Weiner R (2011) ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:229–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Picard M, Adams D, Bierig S, Dent J, Douglas P,Gillam L, Keller A, Malenka D, Masoudi F, McCulloch M, Pellikka P, Peters P, Stainback R, Strachan G, Zoghbi W (2010) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.11.006

  10. Lang R, Bierig M, Devereux R, Flachskampf F, Foster E, Pellikka P, Picard M, Roman M, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer K, Sutton M, Stewart W (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the american society of echocardiography’s guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European society of cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudski L, Lai W, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher M, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon S, Louie E, Schiller N (2010) Guidelines for the Echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quiñones M, Otto C, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi W (2002) Recommendations for quantification of doppler echocardiography: a report from the doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:167–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Helmacke F, Namada NC, Hsiung MC (1987) Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation 75:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58:1072–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleiss J (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Pyschol Bull 76(5):378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chisholm CB, Dodge WR, Balise RR, Williams SR, Gharahbaghian L, Beraud AS (2013) Focused cardiac ultrasound: how much is enough? J Emerg Med 4:818–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ünlüer E, Karagöz A, Akoğlu H, Bayata S (2014) Visual estimation of bedside echocardiographic ejection fraction by emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med 15(2):221–226

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gheno G, Cinetto L (2003) Supervised echocardiography in internal medicine. a integrated model in a community hospital. Eur J Inter Med 15:216–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Calenda P, Jain P, Smith L (1996) Utilization of echocardiography by internists and cardiologists: a comparative study. Am J Med 101:584–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duvall W, Croft L, Goldman M (2003) Can hand-carried ultrasound devices be extended for use by the non-cardiology medical community? Echocardiography 20:471–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaspar E, Morhy S, Lianza A, Carvalho W, Andrade J, do Prado R, Schvartsman C, Delgado A (2014) Focused cardiac ultrasound: a training course for paediatric intensivists and emergency physicians. BMC Medical Education 14(25):2–10

  24. Mai T, Ahn D, Philips C, Agan D, Kumira B (2013) Feasibility of remote real time guidance of cardiac examination performed by novices using a pocket-size ultrasound device. Emerg Med Int. doi:10.1155/2013/627230

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beraud A, Rizk N, Pearl R, Liang D, Patterson A (2013) Focused transthoracic echocardiography during critical care medicine training: curriculum implementation and evaluation of proficiency. Crit Care Med 41:e179–e181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leischik R, Dworrak B, Hensel K (2014) Intra observer and inter observer reproducibility for radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain Echocardiography. Open Cardiovasc Med J 8:102–109

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Johri A, Picard M, Newell J, Marshall J, King M, Hung J (2011) Can a teaching intervention reduce inter observer variability in LVEF Assessment. A quality control exercise in the echocardiography lab. J Am Coll Cardiol Imag 4:821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Butam A, Muhaimin N, Veriah R, Arumugam K, Loch A (2013) Performance of emergency physicians in point of care echocardiography following limited training. Emerg Med J. doi:10.1136/emermed-2012-201789

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thavendiranathan P, Popovi Z, Flamm S, Dahiya A, Grimm R, Marwick T (2013) Improved Inter observer variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:1267–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Cara J, Lang, Koch R, Bala R, Penzotto J, Spencer KT (2003) The use of small personal ultrasound devices by internists without formal training in echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 4:141–147

  31. Breitkreutz R, Uddin S, Steiger H, Ilper H, Steche M, Walcher F, Via G, Price S (2009) Focused echocardiography entry level: new concept of 1-day training course. Minerva Anestesiol 75:285–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 10, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy

    Chiara Mozzini, Ulisse Garbin, Anna Maria Fratta Pasini & Luciano Cominacini

Authors
  1. Chiara Mozzini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulisse Garbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Maria Fratta Pasini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luciano Cominacini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Mozzini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mozzini, C., Garbin, U., Fratta Pasini, A.M. et al. Short training in focused cardiac ultrasound in an Internal Medicine department: what realistic skill targets could be achieved?. Intern Emerg Med 10, 73–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1167-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1167-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation