Skip to main content
Log in

Patient preferences and willingness to pay for different options of anticoagulant therapy

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New anticoagulant drugs alternative to vitamin K antagonists are currently under clinical evaluation. Patient’s preferences should be considered in the development of new therapeutic strategies. Our study aim was to elicit patient preferences, and estimate their willingness to pay for the different treatment options. A Discrete Choice Experiment was administered to patients consecutively attending an anticoagulation clinic, either on stable oral anticoagulant therapy, or during their first visit at the time of starting therapy. Six treatment characteristics were analysed: route and number of medication administrations, frequency of monitoring, risk of some minor bleeding, the amount of attention required for drug/food interactions, requirement for dose adjustment, and out-of-pocket treatment cost. Relationships between patient’s preferences and their characteristics were analysed. 255 patients participated (55 % men, with a mean age 64 years; 35.7 % on stable therapy). A statistically significant importance was attributed to all but two characteristics (the amount of attention required for interaction with other drugs/food and for dose adjustment.) Monthly patient willingness to pay was € 79 for tablets versus injections; € 41 for once-daily versus twice-daily tablets, € 25 for drugs without risk of minor bleeding events and € 20 for once-monthly versus twice-monthly monitoring. Patients on stable therapy considered more important the amount of attention required for drug/food interactions than did the starters. Younger or working patients considered the reduction of monitoring frequency more important than did the older or not working patients (retired, housewives). This study elicited preferences from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy with a simple and well established method, which allows to obtain information warranted for planning optimal healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E (2004) The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists. The seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:204S–233S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan PW, Arant TW, Ellis SL, Ulrich H (2006) The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 24(10):1021–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weitz JI, Bates SM (2005) New anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 3:1843–1853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Nisio M, Middeldorp S, Büller HR (2005) Direct thrombin inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:1028–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mannucci PM, Franchini M (2011) Old and new anticoagulant drugs: a minireview. Ann Med 43:116–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mannucci PM, Nobili A, Garattini S (2012) New drugs for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Intern Med 23:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan M (1999) A role for conjoint analysis in technology assessment in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15(3):443–457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya–Amaya M (2008) Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Louvier JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) State choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Bland M (1995) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, England

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith R (2004) Abusing patients by denying them choice. BMJ 328:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci PM (2011) Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium. J Comorb 1:28–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the institutional allowances of the authors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Mannuccio Mannucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moia, M., Mantovani, L.G., Carpenedo, M. et al. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for different options of anticoagulant therapy. Intern Emerg Med 8, 237–243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-012-0844-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-012-0844-3

Keywords

Navigation