Skip to main content
Log in

Triple needling plus moxibustion and Tanbo-plucking tender points for the third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome

齐刺加灸结合痛点弹拨治疗第三腰椎横突综合征

  • Special Topic Study
  • Published:
Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy of triple needling plus moxibustion and Tanbo-plucking tender points in treating the third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome.

Methods

Totally 108 patients with the third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome were randomized into two groups, 56 cases in the observation group were intervened by triple needling method plus moxibustion and Tanbo-plucking tender points; 52 cases in the control group were by acupuncture plus moxibustion. The pain rating index (PRI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and present pain intensity (PPI) from the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were observed before and after intervention for comparing the therapeutic efficacy.

Results

The total effective rate was 96.4% in the observation group versus 76.9% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After intervention, the sensory-PRI, affective-PRI, total-PRI, VAS, and PPI scores were markedly changed in both groups (P<0.05). The difference in comparing the change of clinical sign score was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The follow-ups performed 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment showed that there were significant differences in comparing the relapse rate between the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Triple needling plus moxibustion and Tanbo-plucking tender points can produce a better efficacy in treating the third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome than acupuncture plus moxibustion alone, and the relapse rate is relatively low.

摘要

目的

观察齐刺加灸结合痛点弹拨治疗第三腰椎横突综合征的临床疗效。

方法

将108例第三腰椎横突综合征患者随机分为两组, 观察组56例予齐刺、 艾灸及痛点弹拨治疗; 对照组52例予针刺、 艾灸治疗。 观察治疗前后两组患者简化McGill疼痛问卷(short-form McGill pain questionnaire, SF-MPQ)中疼痛分级指数(pain rating index, PRI), 视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale, VAS)及现有疼痛强度(present pain intensity, PPI)评分的变化, 并进行疗效比较。

结果

观察组总有效率为96.4%, 对照组为76.9%, 两组总有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 两组患者治疗前后PRI感觉分、 PRI情感分、 PRI总分、 VAS评分、 PPI评分的差值比较, 差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 两组治疗前后临床体征评分差值比较, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 治疗后4星期及治疗后8星期, 两组复发率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

齐刺加灸结合痛点弹拨治疗第三腰椎横突综合征疗效优于针刺加灸治疗, 且复发率低。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang XJ, Zhu WH, Lu QR. Observations on the efficacy of a triple treatment for transverse process syndrome of third lumbar vertebra. Shanghai Zhenjiu Zazhi, 2010, 29(1): 38–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zou CL. Observation on warm needling therapy for third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome. J Acupunct Tuina Sci, 2014, 12(4): 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu F. Needle warming therapy for the treatment of syndrome of the transverse process of the third lumbar vertebra. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2010, 23(6): 440–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roudsari B, Jarvik JG. Lumbar spine MRI for low back pain: indications and yield. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195(3): 550–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leboeuf C. Low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991, 14(5): 311–316.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neville V, Folland JP. The epidemiology and aetiology of injuries in sailing. Sports Med, 2009, 39(2): 129–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Criteria of Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effects of Diseases and Syndromes in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1994: 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu NY, Zhang JY, Zhang R, Yang ZM, Bian HM, Jiang TZ. Effect of different moxibustion materials and doses on 5-HT and histamine. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, 1995, 15(5): 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li XZ, Li ZZ, Xi Q, Guo YM, Guo Y. Research progress of the factors influencing moxibustion. Zhenjiu Linchuang Zazhi, 2008, 18(8): 58–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Li XW, Zhang L. Advances of studies on mechanisms of moxibustion therapy at home and abroad. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, 2001, 21(9): 567–570.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo XE, Lai JQ, Wang CH, Xie JL, Xu Y, Cheng HJ. Analysis of the indexes of surfice electronic signals of lumbar muscles between non-specific low back pain patients and healthy adults. Linchuang He Shiyan Yixue Zazhi, 2009, 6(6): 9–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang JQ, Hou YW, Zhang RH. Proportionality of lumbar muscle discharge in patients with chronic low back pain. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yangjiu Yu Linchuang Kangfu Zazhi, 2009, 13(15): 2969–2973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen FL. Efficacy of triple needling plus stuck needling for the third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Shanghai Zhenjiu Zazhi, 2007, 26(10): 22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Y, Ma LJ. Proximal needling plus moxibustion for 42 cases of third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Zhongguo Zhongyi Jizheng Zazhi, 2006, 15(8): 836.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ding GY. The curative effect observation of tri-prick techniques of needling combined with massage on third lumbar transverse process syndrome: a report of 72 cases. Shangxi Zhongyi, 2008, 24(9): 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xie LL, Liu GP. Research progress of the efficacy and action mechanism of moxibustion. Zhenjiu Linchuang Zazhi, 2000, 16(5): 55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao WP, Zhang W, Zhong FM, Lü J, Li Y, Tang MY. Heat-sensitive moxibustion for 120 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Jiangsu Zhongyiyao, 2010, 42(5): 59.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J. Moxibustion plus cupping for 47 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Shiyong Yiyao Zazhi, 2004, 21(9): 834.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang JH. Plucking tender points in treating third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Liaoning Zhongyi Zazhi, 2007, 34(12):1744.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng WJ. Efficacy of massage for 135 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Anmo Yu Daoyin, 2005, 21(11): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou SF. Clinical analysis of massage for 120 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Gansu Zhongyi, 1998, 11(4): 35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mu J, Li LZ. Acupuncture plus tuina for 56 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Shaanxi Zhongyi, 2009, 30(11): 1522–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou XP, Li YP. Tuina plus acupressure for third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Jing Yao Tong Zazhi, 2006, 27(4): 333.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guo H. Plucking and regulating tendons for 126 third lumbar vertebra syndrome. Anmo Yu Daoyin, 2001, 17(5): 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Guo  (郭清).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Q., Hua, Y., Sheng, F. et al. Triple needling plus moxibustion and Tanbo-plucking tender points for the third lumbar vertebra transverse process syndrome. J. Acupunct. Tuina. Sci. 13, 99–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11726-015-0830-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11726-015-0830-1

Keywords

关键词

中图分类号

Navigation