Skip to main content
Log in

Facteurs pronostiques des cancers colorectaux localisés

Prognostic factors of localized colorectal cancer

  • Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • Published:
Côlon & Rectum

Résumé

Les facteurs permettant de prédire le pronostic des cancers colorectaux localisés reposent avant tout sur la classification TNM, nécessaire mais insuffisante. D’autres facteurs morphologiques pourraient faire leur introduction mais nécessitent une validation prospective pour leur utilisation en pratique clinique. Parmi les paramètres moléculaires, seul le statut MSI est employé dans les cancers de stade II. D’autres paramètres, tel que le statut mutationnel de BRAF qui définit une population agressive de cancer, pourrait être un candidat potentiel. Les signatures moléculaires pourraient permettre un démembrement des stades localisés, en identifiant plus précisément des patients à haut et bas risque de récidive. La réponse immune correspond à un facteur lié à l’hôte, complémentaire de facteurs pronostiques liés à la tumeur et apparait très prometteur. Ces facteurs candidats nécessitent des études de reproductibilité et de validation prospective pour une intégration en pratique clinique.

Abstract

Factors that could predict localized colorectal prognosis are mainly based on the TNM classification, which is however insufficient. Other pathologic factors represent potential candidates but need to be prospectively validated for an integration in the decision setting. Among the molecular markers, only MSI is used for stage II colorectal cancers. Other parameters such as BRAF mutations, which identify a very aggressive group of tumors, could also be a candidate. Molecular signatures could help to better define high risk and low risk patients in terms of relapse. Immune response, which is a factor linked to the host complementary to those linked to the tumor, is a promising factor. All these candidates need reproducibility and prospective studies before their integration in the daily practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al (1995) Intergroup study of fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant therapy for stage II/Dukes B2 colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:2936–2943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The QUASAR Collaborative Group. (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: A randomised study. Lancet 370:2020–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thesaurus cancéro-digestive Thesaurus National de Cancérologie — Cancer du côlon. Disponible sur http://www.tncd.org.

  4. Vilar E, Gruber B. (2010) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-the stable evidence Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol 7:153–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Référence manquante — Merci de vérifier]]

  6. Milburn J, Gunderson L, Greene F, et al (2010) Staging System for Colon and Rectal Carcinoma Ann Surg Oncol 18:1513–1517

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell: New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quirke P, Cuvelier C, Ensari A, et al (2010) Evidence-based medicine: the time has come to set standards for staging. J Pathol 221:357–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sobin L, Compton C, Gospodarowicz M, et al (2010). Evidencebased medicine: the time has come to set standards for staging’. Is a radical overhaul really needed? J Pathol 221:361–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sternberg A, Amar M, Alfici R, et al (2002) Conclusions from a study of venous invasion study in stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 55:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston EI, Lewin DN, Wang HL, et al (2007) Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver agreement study. Lab Invest 87(suppl 1):119.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J. (2009) Perineural Invasion Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5131–5137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita S, Shimoda T, Yoshimura K et al (2003) Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection. J Surg Oncol 84:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Washington MK. (2008) Colorectal carcinoma selected issues in pathologic examination and staging and determination of prognostic factors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1600–1607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halvorsen TB, Seim E. (1989) Association between invasiveness, inflammatory reaction desmoplasia and survival in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 42:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zlobec I, Baker K, Minoo P, et al (2009) Tumor border configuration based to TNM staging better stratifies stage II colorectal cancer patients into prognostic sub groups. Cancer 115:4021–4029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, et al (1986) The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology 10:437–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lugli A, Karamitopoulou E, Zlobec I. (2012) Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 106:1713–1717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuyama T, Nakamura T, Yamaguchi M. (2003) Budding is useful to select highrisk patients in stage II well-differentiated or moderately differentiated colon adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1400–1406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Kikuchi S, et al (2005) Evaluation of the usefulness of tumor budding on the prediction of metastasis to the lung and liver after curative excision of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1432–1435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prall F, Nizze H, Barten M. (2005) Tumour budding as a prognostic factor in stage I/II colorectal carcinoma. Histopathology 47:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang LM, Kevans D, Mulcahy H, et al (2009) Tumor Budding is a Strong and Reproducible Prognostic Marker in T3N0 Colorectal Cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 33:134–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horcic M, Koelzer VH, Karamitopoulou E, et al (2013). Tumor budding score based on 10 high-power fields is a promising basis for a standardized prognostic scoring system in stage II colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol 44:697–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karamitopoulou E, Zlobec I, Kölzer V, et al (2013) Proposal for a 10-high-power-fields scoring method for the assessment of tumor budding in colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol 26:295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Puppa G, Senore C, Sheahan K, et al (2012) Diagnostic reproducibility of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: a multicentre, multinational study using virtual microscopy. Histopathology 61:562–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pages F, Berger A, Camus M, et al (2005) Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2654–2666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, et al (2006) Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313:1960–1964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pages F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, et al (2011) In situ cytotoxic and memory T cells predict outcome in patients with early-stage colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res 71:1263–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, et al (2011) Histopathologicbased prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J Clin Oncol 29:610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sargent DJ, Marsoni S, Monges G, et al (2010) Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3219–3226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Broussard E, Disis M. (2011) TNM staging in colorectal cancer: T is for T cell and M is for memory. J Clin Oncol 29:601–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Halama N, Michel S, Kloor M, et al (2011) Localization and density of immune cells in the invasive margin of human metastatic colorectal cancer are prognostic for response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res 71:5670–5677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Galon J, Pagès F, Marincola FM, et al (2012) Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force. J Transl Med. 3;10:205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bibeau F, Boissière F, Laurent-Puig P (2011) Formes familiales des cancers colorectaux: techniques diagnostiques. Colon Rectum 5179–5184

    Google Scholar 

  35. Popat S, Hubner R, Houlston RS. (2005) Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23:609–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Raman M, Chen W, Cobb MH. (2007) Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. Oncogene 26:3100–3112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, et al (2002) Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature 418:934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barault L, Veyrie N, Jooste V, et al (2008). Mutations in the RAS-MAPK, PI(3)K (phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase) signaling network correlate with poor survival in a population-based series of colon cancers. Int J Cancer 122:2255–2259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN, et al (2001) Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:917–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. French AJ, Sargent DJ, Burgart LJ, et al (2008) Prognostic significance of defective mismatch repair and BRAF V600E in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:3408–3415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, et al (2010) Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3,EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol 28:466–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Roth A, Klingbiel D, Yan P, et al (2010) Molecular and clinical determinants of survival following relapse after curative treatment of stage II–III colon cancer (CC): Results of the translational study on the PETACC 3-EORTC 40993-SAKK 60-00 trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:3504

    Google Scholar 

  43. Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, et al (2005) Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellitestable colon cancers. Cancer Res 65:6063–6069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Roth AD, Delorenzi M, Tepjar S, et al (2012) Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical prognostic factors in stage II/III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1635–1646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lu ATT, Salpeter SR, Reeve AE, et al (2009) Gene expression profiles as predictors of poor outcomes in stage II colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Colorectal Cancer 8:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. O’Connell MJ, Lavery I, Yothers G, et al (2010) Relationship between tumor gene expression and recurrence in four independent studies of patients with stage II/III colon cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin. J Clin Oncol 28:3937–3944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray RG, Quirke P, Handley K, et al (2011) Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4611–4619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Connell MJ, Lee M, Lopatin M, et al (2012) The 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score (RS) predicts recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer patients treated with 5FU/LV (FU) and 5FU/LV + oxaliplatine (FU+OX): validation in NSABP C07. Ann Oncol 23(suppl 9):abstr 523PD

    Google Scholar 

  49. Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G, et al (2011) Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tabernero J, Moreno V, Rosenberg R, et al (2012) Clinical and technical validation of genomic classifier (ColoPrint) for predicting outcomes in stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30: abstr 384

  51. Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Simon R, Salazar R, et al (2012) Development and validation of a robust molecular diagnostic test (coloprint) for predicting outcome in stage II colon cancer patients. Ann Oncol 23(suppl 9): abstr 522PD

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kennedy RD, Bylesjo M, Kerr P, et al (2011) Development and independent validation of a prognostic assay for stage II colon cancer using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. J Clin Oncol 29:4620–4626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Bibeau.

About this article

Cite this article

Bibeau, F., Hazebroucq, J., Pierson, R. et al. Facteurs pronostiques des cancers colorectaux localisés. Colon Rectum 7, 134–142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0469-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-013-0469-3

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation