Skip to main content
Log in

How Should We Treat Animals? A Confucian Reflection

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to the views proposed by modern animal rights scholars, this essay reconstructs the Confucian argument for the moral defensibility of the Confucian ritual use of animals by providing an expository analysis of classical Confucian literature. The argument is developed by focusing on the issue of the sacrificial use of animals in the Confucian tradition. While animals are treated according to certain regulations and restrictions, they are not spared from being offered as sacrifices. An essential component of Confucian virtues, reverence, requires showing deep respect to Heaven, gods, spirits, and humans but not to animals. If Confucians change the rituals in ways that spare animals, they would fail to show the depth of reverence to gods, spirits, and humans that they should.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badhwar, N.K. 2003. “Love.” In Practical Ethics. Edited by H. LaFollette. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Hu Tong Shu Zheng 白虎通疏證 1997. Ed by Chen Li 陳立. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Blakeley, Donald N. 2003. “Listening to the Animals: The Confucian View of Animal Welfare.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.2: 137-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Shude 程樹德. 1996. Summary Interpretations of the Lunyu 論語集釋. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972, Confucius—The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, Bennett 2005. “Love.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/love.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip, J. 2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation, second edition. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Xinyan. 2005. “Why Was Mengzi not a Vegetarianist?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32.1: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Hong 焦竑. 1995. “On Restrictions on Killing 戒殺生論.” In Series of the Complete Books in the Four Libraries 四庫全書存目叢書, volume 107. Taibei 臺北: Zhuangyan Wenhua Shiye Youxian Gongsi 莊嚴文化事業有限公司.

  • Kongzi Jiayu 孔子家語 1996. Ed. by Yang Chunqiu 羊春秋. Taipei 臺北: Sanmin Shuju 三民書局.

  • Lau, D.C., trans. 1970. Mencius. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Legge, James, trans. 1967. Li Chi: Book of Rites. New York: University Books.

  • _____. 1970. The Works of Mencius. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1971. Confucius: Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, Aldo. 1966. New York: A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, Alexander 2006. “Philosophy of Love.” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/1/love.htm.

  • Nivison, David S. 1996. The Ways of Confucianism. Ed. Bryan W. Van Nordan. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Shun, Kwong-loi 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2008. “Wholeness in Confucian Thought: Zhu Xi on Cheng, Zhong, Xin, and Jing.” In The Imperative of Understanding: Chinese Philosophy, Comparative Philosophy, and Onto-Hermeneutics. Ed. by Ng On-cho. New York: Global Scholarly Publications.

  • Steele, John, trans. 1966. The I-li, or Book of Etiquette and Ceremonial, vols. I-II. Taipei: Chengwen Publication Company.

  • Taylor, Rodney L. 1986. The Way of Heaven: An Introduction to the Confucian Religious Life. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waley, Arthur, trans. 1992. Confucianism: The Analects of Confucius. New York: Book of the Month Club.

  • Wollheim, Richard. 1993. “The Sheep and the Ceremony”: The Mind and Its Depths. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Paul. 2001. Reverence: Renewing a Forgotten Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiping Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, R. How Should We Treat Animals? A Confucian Reflection. Dao 9, 79–96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9144-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9144-7

Keywords

Navigation