Abstract
Kant and Confucius maintain that the art of becoming human is synonymous with the unending process of becoming moral. According to Kant, I must imagine a world in which the universality of my maxims were possible, while realizing that if such a world existed, then morality would disappear. Morality is an impossible possibility because it always meets resistance in our encounter with nature. According to Confucius, human beings become moral by integrating themselves into the already meaningful natural order that is tian 天. Like Kant, he upholds the dignity of human beings. For Kant this dignity rests on the autonomy of each human being’s reason, while for Confucius it is dependent upon our interconnection with each other, demanding ongoing self-extension. Despite these differences, the two thinkers would concur that our efforts at humanization are unceasing and that we may never fully live up to our human potential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger, and David Hall. 1998. Thinking from the Han. Albany: SUNY.
Ames, Roger, and Henry Rosemont. 1998 “Introduction.” In The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Analects. 1988. In The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Tr. by Roger Ames and Henry Rosemont. New York: Ballantine Books.
Chalier, Catherine. 2002. What Ought I to Do: Morality in Kant and Levinas. Tr. By Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ching, Julia. 1978. “Chinese Ethics and Kant.” Philosophy East and West 28.2: 161–172.
Hansen, Chad. 1972. “Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 22.2: 169–186.
Kant, Immanuel. 1897. Lectures on Pedagogy. In his On Education. London: Kegan Paul.
_____. 1964. Critique of Practical Reason. Tr. by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper and Row.
_____. 1968. Critique of Judgment. Tr. by J. M. Bernard, New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
_____. 1988a. “Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View.” In Kant: Selections. Ed. Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
_____. 1988b. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Kant: Selections. Ed. Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kroner, Richard. 1956. Kant’s Weltanschauung. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Paton, H.J. 1967. Kant’s Categorical Imperative. London: Hutchinson and Company.
Saurette, Paul. 2002. “Kant’s Culture of Humiliation: Politics and Ethical Cultivation.” Philosophy and Social Criticism. 28.1: 59–90.
Sullivan, Richard J. 1994. An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 2002. “Ren and Li in the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. Edited by Bryan Van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tu, Weiming. 1985. “Selfhood and Otherness in Confucian Thought.” Culture and Self: Asian and Western Perspectives. Ed. by A.J. Marsella, G DeVos, and F.L. K. Hsu. New York: Tavistock.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Froese, K. The Art of Becoming Human: Morality in Kant and Confucius. Dao 7, 257–268 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9070-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9070-0