Skip to main content
Log in

Practical optimization of deployable and scissor-like structures using a fast GA method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses practical sizing optimization of deployable and scissor-like structures from a new point of view. These structures have been recently highly regarded for beauty, lightweight, determine behavior, proper performance against lateral loads and the ability of been compactly packaged. At this time, there is a few studies done considering practical optimization of these structures. Loading considered here includes wind and gravity loads. In foldable scissor-like structures, connections have a complex behavior. For this reason, in this study, the authors used the ABAQUS commercial package as an analyzer in the optimization procedure. This made the obtained optimal solutions highly reliable from the point of view of applicability and construction requirements. Also, to do optimization task, a fast genetic algorithm method, which has been recently introduced by authors, was utilized. Optimization results show that despite less weight for aluminum models than steel models, aluminum deployable structures are not affordable because they need more material than steel structures and cause more environmental damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gantes C J. Deployable Structures: Analysis and Design. Southampton: Wit Press, 2001

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Rhode-Barbarigos L G. An active deployable tensegrity structure. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Lausanne: Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pinero E P. Project for a mobile theatre. Architectural Design, 1961, 12(1): 154–155

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chilton J. Space Grid Structures. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman N, Farkas G. Roof structures in motion-on retractable and deployable roof structures enabling quick construction or adaption to external excitations. Concrete Structures, 2011, 12: 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gantes C J, Connor J J, Logcher R D, Rosenfeld Y. Structural analysis and design of deployable structures. Computers & Structures, 1989, 32(3–4): 661–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Valcarcef J P, Escrig F. Recent advances in the analysis of expandable structures. In: Escrig F, Brebbia C A, eds. Mobile and Rapidly Assembled Structures II (Vol. 21). Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1996, 45–54

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calatrava S. Study on the foldability of trusses. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeigler T R. US Patent 4026313. 1977-05-31

  10. Hernández C H, Zalewski W. Expandable structure for the Venezuelan Pavilion at Expo’92. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Space Structures. 1993, 1710–1719

    Google Scholar 

  11. Escrig F. Expandable space frame structures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Space Structures. Guildford: Elsevier, 1984, 845–850

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenfeld Y, Logcher R D. New concepts for deployablecollapsible structures. International Journal of Space Structures, 1988, 3(1): 20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shan W. Foldable space structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Surrey: University of Surrey, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Langbecker T, Albermani F. Kinematic and non-linear analysis of foldable barrel vaults. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23(2): 158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gantes C, Connor J J, Logcher R D. Combining numerical analysis and engineering judgment to design deployable structures. Computers & Structures, 1991, 40(2): 431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raphael B, Smith I F. A direct stochastic algorithm for global search. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2003, 146(2–3): 729–758

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dizangian B, Ghasemi M R. A fast marginal feasibility search method in size optimization of truss structures. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 16(5): 567–585

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dizangian B, Ghasemi M R. Ranked-based sensitivity analysis for size optimization of structures. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2015, 137(12): 121402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Imai K, Schmit L A. Configuration optimization of trusses. Journal of the Structural Division, 1981, 107(5): 745–756

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghasemi H, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 332: 47–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Nanthakumar S S, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Park H S, Rabczuk T. Topology optimization of piezoelectric nanostructures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2016, 94: 316–335

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghasemi H, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 313: 239–258

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Nanthakumar S S, Zhuang X, Park H S, Rabczuk T. Topology optimization of flexoelectric structures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2017, 105: 217–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland J H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghasemi M R, Hinton E, Wood R D. Optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms for discrete and continuous variables. Engineering Computations, 1999, 16(3): 272–303

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Salar M, Ghasemi M R, Dizangian B. A fast GA-based method for solving truss optimization problems. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 2015, 6(1): 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee K S, Geem Z W. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Computers & Structures, 2004, 82(9–10): 781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. merican Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Manual of Steel Constructional Low Able Stress Design. 9th ed. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction, 1989

  29. ational Building Code of Canada. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. Volume 1. 2005

  30. Nooshin H, Disney P. Formex configuration processing II. International Journal of Space Structures, 2001, 16(1): 1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Ghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salar, M., Ghasemi, M.R. & Dizangian, B. Practical optimization of deployable and scissor-like structures using a fast GA method. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13, 557–568 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0497-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0497-z

Keywords

Navigation