Skip to main content
Log in

Inverse Gaussian process-based corrosion growth modeling and its application in the reliability analysis for energy pipelines

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an inverse Gaussian process-based model to characterize the growth of metal-loss corrosion defects on energy pipelines. The model parameters are evaluated using the Bayesian methodology by combining the inspection data obtained from multiple inspections with the prior distributions. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation techniques are employed to numerically evaluate the posterior marginal distribution of each individual parameter. The measurement errors associated with the ILI tools are considered in the Bayesian inference. The application of the growth model is illustrated using an example involving real inspection data collected from an in-service pipeline in Alberta, Canada. The results indicate that the model in general can predict the growth of corrosion defects reasonably well. Parametric analyses associated with the growth model as well as reliability assessment of the pipeline based on the growth model are also included in the example. The proposed model can be used to facilitate the development and application of reliability-based pipeline corrosion management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong H P. Application of stochastic process to pitting corrosion. Corrosion, 1999, 55(1): 10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maes M A, Faber M H, Dann M R. Hierarchical modeling of pipeline defect growth subject to ILI uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean. Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2009, OMAE2009-79470

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang S, Zhou W, Al-Amin M, Kariyawasam S, Wang H. Timedependent corrosion growth modeling using multiple ILI data. In: Proceedings of IPC 2012, IPC2012-90502. ASME, Calgary, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang X, Xu D. An inverse Gaussian process model for degradation data. Technometrics, 2010, 52(2): 188–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chikkara R S, Folks J L. The Inverse Gaussian Distribution. New York: Marcell Dekker, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Amin M, Zhou W, Zhang S, Kariyawasam S, Wang H. Bayesian model for the calibration of ILI tools. In: Proceedings of IPC 2012, IPC2012-90491. ASME, Calgary, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuller W A. Measurement Error Models. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1987

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaech J L. Statistical Analysis of Measurement Errors. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1985

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardo J, Smith A F M. Bayesian Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelman A, Carlin J B, Stern H S, Rubin D B. Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 2009, 28(25): 3049–3082

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. CSA-Z662 Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou W, Hong H P, Zhang S. Impact of dependent stochastic defect growth on system reliability of corroding pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2012, 96–97: 68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou W. Reliability evaluation of corroding pipelines considering multiple failure modes and time-dependent internal pressure. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2011, 17: 216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leis B N, Stephens D R. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe-part II: Alternative criterion. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Honolulu, 1997, 635–640

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiefner J F, Maxey W A, Eiber R J, Duffy A R. Failure stress levels of flaws in pressurized cylinders, Progress in flaw growth and fracture toughness testing, ASTM STP 536. American Society of Testing and Materials, 1973, 461–481

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou W. System reliability of corroding pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, 87(10): 587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiao G, Sotberg T, Igland. R SUPERB. 2M- statistical data: Basic uncertainty measures for reliability analysis of offshore pipelines. SUPERB JIP report no. STF70 F952112, SUPERB project 700411, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou W, Huang G. Model error assessments of burst capacity models for corroded pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2012, 99–100: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenxing Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qin, H., Zhang, S. & Zhou, W. Inverse Gaussian process-based corrosion growth modeling and its application in the reliability analysis for energy pipelines. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 7, 276–287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0207-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0207-9

Keywords

Navigation