Skip to main content
Log in

The strength-dilatancy characteristics embraced in hypoplasticity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strength-dilatancy characteristics of frictional materials embraced in the hypoplastic model proposed by Gudehus and Bauer are investigated and compared with the revised model suggested by Huang. In the latter the deviatoric stress in the model by Gudehus and Bauer is replaced by a transformed stress according to the stress transformation technique proposed by Matsuoka. The flow rule, the failure state surface equation and the strengthdilatancy relationship embraced in both models are derived analytically. The performance of the two hypoplastic models in reproducing the relationship between the peak strength and the corresponding dilation rate under triaxial compression, plane compression and plane shearing are then extensively investigated and compared with experimental results and with the predictions made by particular classical stress-dilatancy theories. Numerical investigations show that the performance in reproducing the strength-dilatancy relationship is quite satisfactory under triaxial compression stress state in both models and the predictions made by the transformed stress based model are closer to the results obtained from classical stress-dilatancy theories for plane compression and plane shearing problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gudehus G. A comprehensive constitutive equation for granular materials. Soil and Foundation, 1996, 36(1): 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer E. Calibration of a comprehensive hypoplastic model for granular materials. Soil and Foundation, 1996, 36(1): 13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer E. Conditions for embedding Casagrande’s critical states into hypoplasticity. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 2000, 5(2): 125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang W X, Sloan S, Fityus S. Incorporating a predefined limit condition in a hypoplastic model by means of stress transformation. Mechanics of Materials, 2008, 40(10): 796–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuoka H, Yao Y P, Sun D A. The cam-clay models modified by the SMP criterion. Soil and Foundation, 1999, 39(1): 81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor D W. Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics. New York: John & Wiley, 1948

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schofield A N, Wroth C P. Critical State Soil Mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rowe P W. The stress dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1962, 269(1339): 500–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolton M D. The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique, 1986, 36(1): 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simoni A, Houlsby G T. The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand-gravel mixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(3): 523–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vardoulakis I, Georgopoulos I O. The ‘stress-dilatancy’ hypothesis revisited: shear-banding related instabilities. Soil and Foundation, 2005, 45(2): 61–76

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iai S. A new look at the stress dilatancy relation in Cam-Clay model. Soil and Foundation, 1994, 34(2): 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cubrinovski M, Ishihara K. Modelling of sand behaviour based on state concept. Soil and Foundation, 1998, 38(3): 115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuoka H, Nakai T. Relationship among Tresca, Mises, Mohr-Coulomb and Matsuoka-Nakai failure criteria. Soil and Foundation, 1985, 25(4): 123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang W X, Sun D A, Sloan S W. Analysis of the failure mode and softening behavior of sands in true triaxial tests. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44(5): 1423–1437

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lade P V. Assessment of test data for selection of 3-D failure criterion for sand. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2006, 30(4): 307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lade P V. Instability, shear banding, and failure in granular materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2002, 39(13–14): 3337–3357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu Z Z, Bauer E. Hypoplastic constitutive modeling of the long term behaviour and wetting deformation of weathered granular materials. In: Bauer E, Semprich S, Zenz G eds. In: Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Long Term Behaviour of Dams. Graz, 2009, 473–478

  19. Oda M. Deformation mechanism of sand in triaxial compression tests. Soil and Foundation, 1972, 12(4): 45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongzhi Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, Z., Liu, S. & Wang, Z. The strength-dilatancy characteristics embraced in hypoplasticity. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 7, 178–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0191-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0191-0

Keywords

Navigation