Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Regression Tree (CART) applications for the indirect estimation of unsaturated soil shear strength parameters

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shear strength parameters of soil (cohesion and angle of internal friction) are quite essential in solving many civil engineering problems. In order to determine these parameters, laboratory tests are used. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the potential of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Regression Tree (CART) techniques for the indirect estimation of these parameters. Four different models, considering different combinations of 6 inputs, such as gravel %, sand %, silt %, clay %, dry density, and plasticity index, were investigated to evaluate the degree of their effects on the prediction of shear parameters. A performance evaluation was carried out using Correlation Coefficient and Root Mean Squared Error measures. It was observed that for the prediction of friction angle, the performance of both the techniques is about the same. However, for the prediction of cohesion, the ANN technique performs better than the CART technique. It was further observed that the model considering all of the 6 input soil parameters is the most appropriate model for the prediction of shear parameters. Also, connection weight and bias analyses of the best neural network (i.e., 6/2/2) were attempted using Connection Weight, Garson, and proposed Weight-bias approaches to characterize the influence of input variables on shear strength parameters. It was observed that the Connection Weight Approach provides the best overall methodology for accurately quantifying variable importance, and should be favored over the other approaches examined in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal G, Weeraratne S, Khilnani K (1994). Estimating clay liner and cover permeability using computational neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbulut S (2005). Artificial neural networks for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of coarse grained soils. Eurasian Soil Sci, 38: 392–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi A H, Gandomi A H, Gandomi M, Sadat H S S (2009). Prediction of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of stabilized soil using RBF neural networks. IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 2(2): 98–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora M K, Das Gupta A S, Gupta R P (2004). An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens, 25(3): 559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Tatnall A R L (1997). Neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens, 18(4): 699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attoh-Okine N O (2004). Application of genetic-based neural network to lateritic soil strength modeling. Construct Build Mater, 18(8): 619–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykasoğlu A, Güllüb H, Çanakçıb H, Özbakırc L (2008). Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming. Expert Syst Appl, 35(1–2): 111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J H, Olshen R A, Stone C J (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Newyork: Chapman and Hall Ltd/CRC

    Google Scholar 

  • Çanakcı H, Baykasoglu A, Gullu H (2009). Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of Gaziantep basalts via neural networks and gene expression programming. Neural Comput Appl, 18(8): 1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S E (2009). Probabilistic stability analyses of slopes using the ANNbased response surface. Comput Geotech, 36(5): 787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S K, Basudhar P K (2008). Prediction of residual friction angle of clays using artificial neural network. Eng Geol, 100(3–4): 142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escario V, Juca J E T (1989). Strength and deformation of partly saturated soils. In: Proceedings 12th International Conf. Soil Mech. Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, 1: 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferentinou M D, Sakellariou M G (2007). Computational intelligence tools for the prediction of slope performance. Comput Geotech, 34(5): 362–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody G M, Arora M K (1997). An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network. Int J Remote Sens, 18(4): 799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund J E (1992). Mathematical Statistics (5th edition). New Delhi: Printice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., 658

  • Garson G D (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artif Intell Expert, 6: 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S (2003). Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model, 160: 249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh A T C, Kulhawy F H, Asce F, Chua C G (1994). Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 120(9): 1467–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh A T C, Kulhawy F H, Chua C G (2005). Bayesian neural network analysis of undrained side resistance of drilled shafts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 131(1): 84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktepe A B, Altun S, Altintas G, Tan O (2008). Shear strength estimation of plastic clays with statistical and neural approaches. Build Environ, 43(5): 849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktepe A B, Sezer A (2010). Effect of particle shape on density and permeability of sands. Proceedings of institution of civil engineers geotechnical engineering, 163: 307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez H, Kavzoglu T (2005). Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol, 78(1–2): 11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P (1996). Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources: using evidential reasoning and artificial neural network techniques for geological mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62(5): 513–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan M T, Demuth H B, Beale M H (1996). Neural Network Design. Boston: PWS Publishing, 730

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan M T, Menhaj M B (1994). Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 5(6): 989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna A M, Ural D, Saygili G (2007). Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 27(6): 521–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1998). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 842

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720 (Part IV) (1985). Indian Standard for Grain Size Analysis (2nd Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720 (Part V) (1985). Indian Standard for Determination of Liquid and Plastic Limit (2nd Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720 (Part XIII) (1986). Indian Standard for Direct Shear Test (2nd Revision). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Seung H S, Turaga S C (2010). Machines that learn to segment images: a crucial technology for connectomics. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 20(5): 653–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang C H, Chen C J, Jiang T, Andrus R D (2000). Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J, 37(6): 1195–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo D P, Arora M K, Sarkar S, Gupta R P (2006). A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol, 85(3–4): 347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya A (2009). Residual and fully softened strength evaluation of soils using artificial neural networks. Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, 27(2): 281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayadelen C, Günaydın O, Fener M, Demir A, Özvan A (2009). Modeling of the angle of shearing resistance of soils using soft computing systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 11814–11826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu J H, Won J S, Park H J (2004). Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol, 71(3–4): 289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Rosenbaum M S (2003). Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability. Nat Hazards, 30(3): 383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z (1992). The relationship of shear strength to swelling pressure for unsaturated soils. Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering, 14(3): 1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maji V B, Sitharam T G (2008). Prediction of elastic modulus of jointed rock mass using artificial neural networks. Geotech Geol Eng, 26(4): 443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar Y M, Basheer I A (1996). Discussion of stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks. J Geotech Eng, 122(11): 949–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neaupane K M, Achet S H (2004). Use of backpropagation neural network for landslide monitoring: a case study in the higher Himalaya. Eng Geol, 74(3–4): 213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu H A, Duman T Y, Durmaz S (2008). Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology, 94(3–4): 401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden J D, Jackson D A (2002). Illuminating the “black box”: understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model, 154: 135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden J D, Joy M K, Death R G (2004). An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Model, 178(3–4): 389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiai H, Jafari A (2011). Artificial neural networks as a basis for new generation of rock failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(7): 1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley B (1996). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 403

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalkoff R J (1997). Artificial Neural Networks. New York: Wiley, 422

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Yu S (1996). The problems in the present studies on mechanics of unsaturated soils. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Regional Soils. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sietsma J, Dow R J F (1991). Creating artificial neural networks that generalize. Neural Netw, 4(1): 67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Gokceoglua C, Nefeslioglub H A, Kayabasi A (2006). Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. Eng Geol, 43: 224–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryaki B (2008). Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees. Eng Geol, 99(1–2): 51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y (1997). Mechanical Properties of Unsaturated Expansive Soils and Its Application to Engineering. Dissertation for Ph.D degree. Nanjing: Hohai University (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005). Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol, 79(3–4): 251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd T L, Gilstrap S D (1999). Liquefaction and deformation of silty and fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, 3: 1013–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W (1999). Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of back propagation neural networks for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and remote sensing, 37: 771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical Engineering Group, CSIR — Central Building Research Institute (CBRI), Roorkee, 247667, India

    D. P. Kanungo, Shaifaly Sharma & Anindya Pain

Authors
  1. D. P. Kanungo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaifaly Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anindya Pain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. P. Kanungo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanungo, D.P., Sharma, S. & Pain, A. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Regression Tree (CART) applications for the indirect estimation of unsaturated soil shear strength parameters. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 439–456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0416-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0416-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation