Skip to main content
Log in

From similarity perspective: a robust collaborative filtering approach for service recommendations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative filtering (CF) is a technique commonly used for personalized recommendation and Web service quality-of-service (QoS) prediction. However, CF is vulnerable to shilling attackers who inject fake user profiles into the system. In this paper, we first present the shilling attack problem on CF-based QoS recommender systems for Web services. Then, a robust CF recommendation approach is proposed from a user similarity perspective to enhance the resistance of the recommender systems to the shilling attack. In the approach, the generally used similarity measures are analyzed, and the DegSim (the degree of similarities with top k neighbors) with those measures is selected for grouping and weighting the users. Then, the weights are used to calculate the service similarities/differences and predictions.We analyzed and evaluated our algorithms using WS-DREAM and Movielens datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that shilling attacks influence the prediction of QoS values, and our proposed features and algorithms achieve a higher degree of robustness against shilling attacks than the typical CF algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zheng Z B, Ma H, Lyu MR, King I. Collaborative Web service qos prediction via neighborhood integrated matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2013, 6(3): 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernando A, Bobadilla J, Ortega F. A non negative matrix factorization for collaborative filtering recommender systems based on a Bayesian probabilistic model. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 97: 188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu J L, Zheng Z B, Lyu M R. Web service personalized quality of service prediction via reputation-based matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2016, 65(1): 28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang S H, Qian X M, Shen J L, Fu Y, Mei T. Author topic modelbased collaborative filtering for personalized POI recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2015, 17(6): 907–918

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mobasher B, Burke R, Sandvig J J. Model-based collaborative filtering as a defense against profile injection attacks. In: Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2006, 1388–1393

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hurley N, Cheng Z P, Zhang M. Statistical attack detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACMConference on Recommender Systems. 2009, 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang S, Ouyang Y, Ford J, Makedon F. Analysis of a low-dimensional linear model under recommendation attacks. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2006, 517–524

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2001, 285–295

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mobasher B, Burke R, Bhaumik R, Williams C. Toward trustworthy recommender systems: an analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 2007, 7(4): 2301–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Q Q. Supervised approach for detecting average over popular items attack in collaborative recommender systems. IET Information Security, 2016, 10(3): 134–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chirita P A, Nejdl W, Zamfir C. Preventing shilling attacks in online recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Web Information and Data Management. 2005, 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Z H, Cai Z, Guan X H. Estimating user behavior toward detecting anomalous ratings in rating systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 111: 114–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Z, Kulkarni S R. Detection of shilling attacks in recommender systems via spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Conference on Information Fusion. 2014, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cao J, Wu Z, Mao B, Zhang Y C. Shilling attack detection stilizing semi-supervised learning method for collaborative recommender system. World Wide Web, 2013, 16(5): 729–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Z, Wang Y Q, Wang Y Q, Wu J J, Cao J, Zhang L. Spammers detection from product reviews: a hybrid model. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Data Mining. 2015, 1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donovan J, Smyth B. Trust in recommender Systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2005, 39(4): 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moradi P, Ahmadian S. A reliability-based recommendation method to improve trust-aware recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(21): 7386–7398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia H, Fang B, Gao M, Ma H, Tang Y Y, Wen J. A novel item anomaly detection approach against Shilling attacks in collaborative recommendation systems using the dynamic time interval segmentation technique. Information Sciences, 2015, 306: 150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mobasher B, Burke R, Williams C, Bhaumik R. Analysis and detection of segment-focused attacks against collaborative recommendation. In: Proceedings of Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis. 2006, 96–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mobasher B, Burke R, Bhaumik R, Williams C. Effective attack models for shilling item-based collaborative filtering systems. In: Proceedings of KDD Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis. 2005, 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Zheng Z B, Yu Q, LyuM. R.Web service recommendation via exploiting location and qos information. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2014, 25(7): 1913–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta B, Hofmann T, Fankhauser P. Lies and propaganda: detecting spam users in collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2007, 14–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G J, Musau F, Guo S, Abdullahi M B. Neighbor similarity trust against sybil attack in P2P e-commerce. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2015, 26(3): 824–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Mahony M, Hurley N, Kushmerick N. Collaborative recommendation: a robustness analysis. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 2004, 4(4): 344–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shang M S, Lu L Y, Zeng W, Zhang Y C, Zhou T. Relevance is more significant than correlation: information filtering on sparse data. Europhysics Letters, 2009, 88(6): 68008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ziegler C N, Golbeck J, Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43(2): 460–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee D H, Brusilovsky P. Social networks and interest similarity: the case of CiteULike. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. 2010, 151–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh H K, Kim S W, Robust features for trustable aggregation of online ratings. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. 2016, 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kriegel H P, Kroger P, Sander J, Zimek A. Density-based clustering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2011, 1(3): 231–240

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ester M, Kriegel H P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of KDD Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis. 1996, 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lemire D, Maclachlan A. Slope one predictors for online rating-based collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of SIAM Data Mining. 2005, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Mahony M P, Hurley N J, Silvestre G C. Promoting recommendations: an attack on collaborative filtering. Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, 2453: 494–503

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao J, Wu Z A, Wang Y Q, Zhuang Y. Hybrid collaborative filtering algorithm for bidirectional Web service recommendation. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013, 36(3): 607–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yao L, Sheng Q Z, Segev A, Yu J. Recommending Web services via combining collaborative filtering with content-based features. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Conference on Web Services. 2013, 42–49

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng Z B, Ma H, Lyu M R, King l. QoS-aware Web service recommendation by collaborative filtering. IEEE Transaction on Services Computing, 2011, 4(2): 140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jung J J, Attribute selection-based recommendation framework for short-head user group: an empirical study by movieLens and IMDB. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(4): 4049–4054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rong W G, Liu K C, Liang L. Personalized Web service ranking via user group combining association rule. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Services Computing. 2009, 445–452

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rong W G, Peng B L, Ouyang Y, Liu K C, Xiong Z. Collaborative personal profiling for Web service ranking and recommendation. Information Systems Frontiers, 2015, 17(6): 1265–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen X, Liu X D, Huang Z C, Sun H L. Region kNN: a scalable hybrid collaborative filtering algorithm for personalized Web service recommendation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Web Services. 2010, 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bryan K, O’ Mahony M, Cunningham P. Unsupervised retrieval of attack profiles in collaborative recommender systems. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2008, 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  41. Massa P, Avesani P. Trust-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2007, 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang F G. Research on trust based collaborative filtering algorithm for user’s multiple interests. Journal of Chinese Computer System, 2008, 29(8): 1415–1419

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mehta B, Nejdl W. Attack resistant collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2008, 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hurley N J, Robustness of recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender System. 2011, 9–10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Douceur J R. The sybil attack. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Peer-to-peer Systems. 2002, 251–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Karlof C, DavidW. Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: attacks and countermeasures. Ad Hoc Networks, 2003, 1(2): 293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Newsome J, Shi E, Song D, Perrig A. The sybil attack in sensor networks: analysis & defenses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 2004, 259–268

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yu H F, Shi C W, Kaminsky M, Gibbons P B, Xiao F. Dsybil: optimal sybil-resistance for recommendation systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 2009, 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  49. Noh G, Kang Y M, Oh H, Kim C K. Robust sybil attack defense with information level in online recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(4): 1781–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Basic and Advanced Research Projects in Chongqing (cstc2015jcyjA40049), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71102065), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (106112014 CDJZR 095502), and the China Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Gao.

Additional information

Min Gao received her MS and PhD degrees in computer science from Chongqing University (CQU), China in 2005 and 2010, respectively. She is now an associate professor at the School of Software Engineering, CQU. She was a visiting researcher at the School of Business, University of Reading, UK. Her research interests include recommendation system, service computing, and data mining. She has published over 30 refereed journal and conference papers in these areas. She is a member of the IEEE and CCF.

Bin Ling received the BE, MS and MR. degrees from Staffordshire University, UK in 1995, 1998, and 1999, respectively. He was formerly a research fellow at School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, UK from 2000 to 2006, and at School of Business, University of Reading, UK from 2006 to 2010. He is currently working on a project at School of Engineering, University of Portsmouth, UK. His research interests include information sharing, project management, and recommendation system.

Linda Yang received her PhD degree in computer science from Peking University, China in 1999, and her MS and BE degrees in computer software in 1996 and 1993, respectively. She has been a senior lecturer at University of Portsmouth, UK since 2004. Prior to that, she was a lecturer at the Robert Gordon University, a senior research fellow at University of St Andrews and Cardiff University, UK. Her research interests include information retrieval, recommendation system, data mining as well as their applications in social networks, health-informatics and business. She has worked on UK and European funded research projects since 1999 and published over 50 papers in refereed journals and conferences. She is a member of the IET, WES and HEA.

Junhao Wen received the PhD degree from the Chongqing University (CQU), China in 2008. He is a professor and the vice dean of the School of Software Engineering, CQU. His research interests include service computing, cloud computing, and software dependable engineering. He has published more than 80 refereed journal and conference papers in these areas. He has more than 30 research and industrial projects and developed many commercial systems and software tools.

Qingyu Xiong is the dean of the School of Software Engineering, Chongqing University (CQU), China. He received the BS and MS degrees from the School of Automation, CQU in 1986 and 1991, respectively, and the PhD degree from Kyushu University, Japan in 2002. His research interests include neural networks and their applications. He has published more than 100 journal and conference papers in these areas. Moreover, he has more than 20 research and applied grants.

Shun Li is a PhD student at the School of Software Engineering, Chongqing University (CQU), China. He received his BE degree from CQU in 2014. His research interests include service computing, recommendation system, and machine learning.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, M., Ling, B., Yang, L. et al. From similarity perspective: a robust collaborative filtering approach for service recommendations. Front. Comput. Sci. 13, 231–246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6566-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6566-y

Keywords

Navigation